Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,155 posts)

2. Trump didn't need to be a target himself to obstruct.

Reply to SaschaHM (Original post)

Wed Jun 7, 2017, 02:39 PM

Jun 2017

But the fact that he did seek to obstruct would certainly give cause to make him a target himself where he previously may not have been so.

I mean, did he really care about Michael Flynn for Michael Flynn's sake? Really?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Don't get hung up on Comey telling Trump that he is not under investigation. [View all] SaschaHM Jun 2017 OP

He actually hedges on that point jberryhill Jun 2017 #1

though, re: Russian collusion, doubtful there'd be a criminal investigation without geek tragedy Jun 2017 #5

Trump didn't need to be a target himself to obstruct. Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2017 #2

Good points bettyellen Jun 2017 #4

yeap YCHDT Jun 2017 #8

He also said they were not willing to release a statement to that effect in case elehhhhna Jun 2017 #3

trump wasn't at that point in the Flynn Investigation NightWatcher Jun 2017 #6

I agree. When I read the full statement in context those were nothing. herding cats Jun 2017 #7