Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
K&R for telling of the Denialists AND the Woo-Woos! Odin2005 Jul 2012 #1
You know it! Tired of science getting trashed and the denialists. n/t Avalux Jul 2012 #2
Science doesn't yet provide all the answers to many deep questions ... spin Jul 2012 #3
Wrong ! RagAss Jul 2012 #4
That is basically true today ... spin Jul 2012 #8
Why should science have to deal with morality? vanlassie Jul 2012 #5
I totally agee. (n/t) spin Jul 2012 #9
Morality falls under the umbrella of psychology and sociology MattBaggins Jul 2012 #60
Philosophy has more to do with ethics & morality. DirkGently Jul 2012 #89
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalux Jul 2012 #10
Well I don't agree that I've tried to do anything except respond to the statement vanlassie Jul 2012 #14
I'm so sorry!! Avalux Jul 2012 #15
No problem-o! vanlassie Jul 2012 #16
Science doesn't deal with morality, period. MattBaggins Jul 2012 #61
What i've found... Scootaloo Jul 2012 #26
"many strains of Buddhism don't regard women as human" ? mmonk Jul 2012 #33
I was wondering that as well. white_wolf Jul 2012 #83
There are deep questions. Science doesn't know "the meaning of life." DirkGently Jul 2012 #56
Science doesn't know why kids love the taste of cinnamon toast crunch either MattBaggins Jul 2012 #63
Although I think there was a test regarding going Cuckoo for Coco-Puffs. DirkGently Jul 2012 #67
Life doesn't NEED a meaning. FrodosPet Jul 2012 #80
That's a philosophy. One of many possible. DirkGently Jul 2012 #93
No, we don't know everything. But we CAN. Scootaloo Jul 2012 #73
Uh, no. Philosophy is simply a different discipline. DirkGently Jul 2012 #74
Limiting if you think bullshit deserves a place next to fact, yes. Scootaloo Jul 2012 #82
That is a stunningly ludicrous definition of philosophy. DirkGently Jul 2012 #87
Ethics are actually instinctual Scootaloo Jul 2012 #90
Science doesn't observe "what's already there?" DirkGently Jul 2012 #92
+1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 x Infinity! Odin2005 Jul 2012 #58
^^This^^ nt mr blur Jul 2012 #68
Science does a great job dealing with morality. Religion sucks at it Major Nikon Jul 2012 #28
Philosophy discusses ethics, and science explains ethics Scootaloo Jul 2012 #29
No, science explains (or is in the process of explaining) Quantess Jul 2012 #31
Yes quantum physics is a fascinating subject ... spin Jul 2012 #65
No, I cannot wrap my mind around some of it! But it is fun trying! Quantess Jul 2012 #71
It seems to show that once what was considered impossible is actually possible ... spin Jul 2012 #72
Well it does provide answers for a lot of those things 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #43
Science in fact can deal with questions of morality MattBaggins Jul 2012 #59
History shows that both science and religion have sometimes been misused ... spin Jul 2012 #66
Science has actually contributed a great deal to our understanding of morality. LeftyMom Jul 2012 #84
The misuse of both science and religion have led to unnecessary war ... spin Jul 2012 #86
Yes, it does. We're just not there yet. nt RedCappedBandit Jul 2012 #97
While I agree with you concerning global climate change and its cause, MadHound Jul 2012 #6
Science is about a different kind of truth pwhtckll Jul 2012 #17
Excellent. It's a process. NOT "objective truth." DirkGently Jul 2012 #91
I agree. Well said. Your post should not have been bypassed. Festivito Jul 2012 #21
Yes. It's incredibly arrogant to pretend science is even objective. DirkGently Jul 2012 #88
I think Indiana Jones would agree with me on this one derby378 Jul 2012 #7
Not exactly. immoderate Jul 2012 #11
Semantics; you and I obviously have differing perceptions about the meaning of the word. Avalux Jul 2012 #12
However as we learn more, scientific theories often change. ... spin Jul 2012 #18
I know what you're saying.... Avalux Jul 2012 #19
I believe we will understand far more about dark matter in 20 to 50 years ... spin Jul 2012 #25
I think so too. Avalux Jul 2012 #38
I'm extremely concerned about our educational system ... spin Jul 2012 #46
Science is open to change when new information becomes available. The people who don't believe libinnyandia Jul 2012 #76
That "truth" that may not exist? MattBaggins Jul 2012 #64
Therein lies the problem derby378 Jul 2012 #75
DU needs an Objectivism forum. bananas Jul 2012 #13
Science doesn't teach us to do something about it. tinrobot Jul 2012 #20
That is true. I agree with you completely. Avalux Jul 2012 #23
Can you say objectively why the Big Bang happened? (nt) Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #22
Nope, not why. Avalux Jul 2012 #24
You only BELIEVE that science explains true rules. Kablooie Jul 2012 #27
Sorry I don't agree. Belief has nothing to do with it. n/t Avalux Jul 2012 #37
Insider Report on Big Pharma’s Corrupt Marketing and Phony Science HiPointDem Jul 2012 #30
I somewhat agree with this insider report.... Avalux Jul 2012 #36
Is it an objective truth that this planet needs a caretaker? GeorgeGist Jul 2012 #32
No it isn't. However....human beings have the ability to think and reason. Avalux Jul 2012 #34
I would reframe this as "Science is the Only Pramatic Truth" aikoaiko Jul 2012 #35
Pragmatic works too. Avalux Jul 2012 #39
Is the concept of human equality pragmatic? DirkGently Jul 2012 #94
Yes, I would say the concept of human equality is pragmatic. aikoaiko Jul 2012 #98
so according to you 100 degree weather and tornadoes hfojvt Jul 2012 #40
You've taken the liberty of making assumptions about me in your post. Avalux Jul 2012 #42
+ 10 | You beat me to it. man4allcats Jul 2012 #44
Yep. If you look at data over the past 30 years, there is definitely a worldwide trend. Avalux Jul 2012 #49
you didn't mention a worldwide trend hfojvt Jul 2012 #45
Sorry, you are dead wrong. Avalux Jul 2012 #47
it is tiring isn't it hfojvt Jul 2012 #55
What are you talking about? Avalux Jul 2012 #57
"Beauty is truth, truth beauty," - that is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know. Swede Jul 2012 #41
And I will say to that....science is beautiful. Avalux Jul 2012 #48
Given that some 70% of Americans believe that angels coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #50
Um, no. Viking12 Jul 2012 #51
Now now, don't hit and run, If you're going to say that as a counter to my post, explain. Avalux Jul 2012 #52
Philosphy 201: Epsitemic Systems Viking12 Jul 2012 #53
I am familiar with epsitemic philosophy and you still didn't answer me... Avalux Jul 2012 #54
There is no such thing as "objective truth"... you know what that statement sounds like? Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #77
No! Magic underwear is the only TRUTH! randome Jul 2012 #62
What about a mothers intuition? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #69
The most significant thing about the scientific method is hifiguy Jul 2012 #70
Nature is the only truth. longship Jul 2012 #78
What about math? THAT seems like the only real truth to me. FrodosPet Jul 2012 #79
MEASUREMENT is objective truth. Speck Tater Jul 2012 #81
Doesn't quantum physics say otherwise? DirkGently Jul 2012 #96
Oh, you're right, of course! Speck Tater Jul 2012 #99
Only applies to quantum physics Confusious Jul 2012 #102
GW deniers the same as Tobacco causes cancer deniers 30 years ago. ErikJ Jul 2012 #85
Utter nonsense. All observations are ultimately from our SUBJECTIVE P.O.V. The very subjects we Romulox Jul 2012 #95
Having worked at NIH for a few years deutsey Jul 2012 #100
These people going on about "ONLY truth!!!!" can't even define the word "truth"! Romulox Jul 2012 #106
What good is believing in the truth of global warming while supporting more arctic oil drilling, limpyhobbler Jul 2012 #101
I have a beautiful wife and two beautiful daughters. grantcart Jul 2012 #103
Are you confusing objective with subjective? JNelson6563 Jul 2012 #107
I have a beautiful wife and two beautiful daughters. grantcart Jul 2012 #103
I have a beautiful wife and two beautiful daughters. grantcart Jul 2012 #105
Amen! Zyzafyx Jul 2012 #108
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Science is the Only Objec...»Reply #24