Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)An article from the Intercept, confirming what many already knew... [View all]
Surprising, since I don't care much for the Intercept.
When some leaders say things that are demonstrably wrong it's a slap in the face to what we- PoC who make up a sizeable base of the Dem party- have experienced.
TOP DEMOCRATS ARE WRONG: TRUMP SUPPORTERS WERE MORE MOTIVATED BY RACISM THAN ECONOMIC ISSUES
by Mehdi Hasan
Philip Klinkner, a political scientist at Hamilton College and an expert on race relations, has pored over this ANES data and tells me that whether its good politics to say so or not, the evidence from the 2016 election is very clear that attitudes about blacks, immigrants, and Muslims were a key component of Trumps appeal. For example, he says, in 2016 Trump did worse than Mitt Romney among voters with low and moderate levels of racial resentment, but much better among those with high levels of resentment.
The new ANES data only confirms what a plethora of studies have told us since the start of the presidential campaign: the race was about race. Klinkner himself grabbed headlines last summer when he revealed that the best way to identify a Trump supporter in the U.S. was to ask just one simple question: is Barack Obama a Muslim? Because, he said, if they are white and the answer is yes, 89 percent of the time that person will have a higher opinion of Trump than Clinton. This is economic anxiety? Really?
Other surveys and polls of Trump voters found a strong relationship between anti-black attitudes and support for Trump; Trump supporters being more likely to describe African Americans as criminal, unintelligent, lazy and violent; more likely to believe people of color are taking white jobs; and a majority of them rating blacks as less evolved than whites. Sorry, but how can any of these prejudices be blamed on free trade or low wages?
For Sanders, Warren and others on the left, the economy is what matters most and class is everything. Yet the empirical evidence just isnt there to support them. Yes Trump won a (big) majority of non-college-educated whites, but he also won a majority of college-educated whites, too. He won more young white voters than Clinton did and also a majority of white women; he managed to win white votes regardless of age, gender, income or education. Class wasnt everything in 2016. In a recent essay in The Nation, analysts Sean McElwee and Jason McDaniel point out that income predicted support for McCain and Romney, but not Trump. Their conclusion? Racial identity and attitudes have further displaced class as the central battleground of American politics.
The new ANES data only confirms what a plethora of studies have told us since the start of the presidential campaign: the race was about race. Klinkner himself grabbed headlines last summer when he revealed that the best way to identify a Trump supporter in the U.S. was to ask just one simple question: is Barack Obama a Muslim? Because, he said, if they are white and the answer is yes, 89 percent of the time that person will have a higher opinion of Trump than Clinton. This is economic anxiety? Really?
Other surveys and polls of Trump voters found a strong relationship between anti-black attitudes and support for Trump; Trump supporters being more likely to describe African Americans as criminal, unintelligent, lazy and violent; more likely to believe people of color are taking white jobs; and a majority of them rating blacks as less evolved than whites. Sorry, but how can any of these prejudices be blamed on free trade or low wages?
For Sanders, Warren and others on the left, the economy is what matters most and class is everything. Yet the empirical evidence just isnt there to support them. Yes Trump won a (big) majority of non-college-educated whites, but he also won a majority of college-educated whites, too. He won more young white voters than Clinton did and also a majority of white women; he managed to win white votes regardless of age, gender, income or education. Class wasnt everything in 2016. In a recent essay in The Nation, analysts Sean McElwee and Jason McDaniel point out that income predicted support for McCain and Romney, but not Trump. Their conclusion? Racial identity and attitudes have further displaced class as the central battleground of American politics.
See also Blue_Tires post here: https://www.democraticunderground.com/118760856
The situation is deplorable.
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

This was obvious during primary season and it only intensified as the year progressed.
LonePirate
Apr 2017
#4
I stomached watching a couple rallies, just out of curiosity from start to finish.
JHan
Apr 2017
#11
Sexism was a big one.. I know *some* non-white fellas who loved the juvenile sexist machismo talk..
JHan
Apr 2017
#7
I know someone wh outright SAID he would not vote Hillary BECAUSE she was a woman
CousinIT
Apr 2017
#8
Racism is still not a root in and of itself. It's not something we are born with. Why people are
JCanete
Apr 2017
#12
Racism in this nation is not in question by me, at all. Why it is an effective tool--Why it
JCanete
Apr 2017
#16
I certainly see wisdom in that statement, and it does pretty much sum up how the behavior
JCanete
Apr 2017
#24
still missing the point. these levels of racism are a symptom of ignoring talk radio
certainot
Apr 2017
#20
that's my point - the soil is shit in and turned by these blowhards. they eased the shame
certainot
Apr 2017
#23