Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)

4. They admit Obama didn't wiretap trump but cannot say anything whenever trump people are mentioned.

Reply to MineralMan (Original post)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 11:41 AM

Mar 2017

I take this to mean that they've come to a resolution about Obama and wiretaps but they are still working trump's people and there is some level of guilt.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Please note: Comey and Rogers simply cannot talk about [View all] MineralMan Mar 2017 OP

But if there were NO connection cilla4progress Mar 2017 #1

RIGHT !!! What says more is what they can NOT say right now uponit7771 Mar 2017 #2

Sort of. Although the same answers could mean MineralMan Mar 2017 #7

Right. Patience. And read the analyses. :) Hortensis Mar 2017 #9

Not always. The fact of a specific investigation MineralMan Mar 2017 #3

But, so what about Clapper cilla4progress Mar 2017 #5

You could logically assume that, yes. MineralMan Mar 2017 #10

They admit Obama didn't wiretap trump but cannot say anything whenever trump people are mentioned. NightWatcher Mar 2017 #4

to me it seems to signal ongoing investigations as much as classification. . . n/t annabanana Mar 2017 #6

That there are specific ongoing investigations is classfied, MineralMan Mar 2017 #12

A lot of this is to get their 'no comments' on the Congressional record, though. randome Mar 2017 #8

We'll all take whatever we take from those "no comment" statements. MineralMan Mar 2017 #11