Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Her mistake was in hyping it 90 minutes beforehand on twitter.... scheming daemons Mar 2017 #1
True brettdale Mar 2017 #3
She Tweeted it was from 2005. WinkyDink Mar 2017 #68
Did you pay attention to what DC Johnston said The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2017 #2
Rachel is going to run off with Van Jones True Dough Mar 2017 #6
Every Republican wants to eliminate the AMT oberliner Mar 2017 #58
............. JHan Mar 2017 #4
Some of these threads tonight... BannonsLiver Mar 2017 #5
Rachel is just a slave to ratings like everyone else on TV news world wide wally Mar 2017 #7
It was probably hyped more than it deserved to be, The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2017 #8
My whole point brettdale Mar 2017 #12
It wasn't "nothing." The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2017 #13
Not in a 100 million trillion years Justice Mar 2017 #9
I believe her heart is in the right place. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2017 #10
I am more interested in what his source of income is. lapfog_1 Mar 2017 #11
And that's why we need the complete tax returns. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2017 #16
Even then, his tax attorneys are smart enough not to name a source of income 'Russian Bribes." Hoyt Mar 2017 #33
74% of the public wants to see full returns.... bettyellen Mar 2017 #47
You talking about the August 2016 poll? He still got elected, they must not cared much. Heck, Hoyt Mar 2017 #50
Nope- Rachel and I are talking about why we need to see his income sources and who he's is debt to bettyellen Mar 2017 #56
You are correct, there was also a poll in January. But he was still elected, so I will stick with Hoyt Mar 2017 #61
That's why Rachel did a show on why we should care, silly. bettyellen Mar 2017 #72
Would love to be wrong. But even if someone connects all those dots, Trump's supporters won't care. Hoyt Mar 2017 #74
It doesn't matter what they think. It matters that there's huge support growing to subpoena his bettyellen Mar 2017 #75
. BainsBane Mar 2017 #14
What the wha...? pnwest Mar 2017 #15
I'm glad that i dropped csble. CentralMass Mar 2017 #17
Sorry that everybody didn't get a cookie. longship Mar 2017 #18
Well, no, she only announced that after Twitter went wild over her first tweet. Azathoth Mar 2017 #19
I saw it too. longship Mar 2017 #20
Donald got a big cookie Azathoth Mar 2017 #21
Nice try. longship Mar 2017 #24
Eh, Trump also 'disagrees' with the CBO Azathoth Mar 2017 #25
Adorable spin leftynyc Mar 2017 #35
That's quite the unsupported allegation you call a fact, regardless of your impressionism... LanternWaste Mar 2017 #55
really? take a look on the internet.....anywhere frankieallen Mar 2017 #71
I love that song. Warren DeMontague Mar 2017 #29
This sounds like something from trumpland rockfordfile Mar 2017 #22
No. Give it time. Rome was not built in a day. It's the first step. Watch and wait. And keep caroldansen Mar 2017 #23
I know folks feel some kind of way but this is the funniest thing I've read in a while.. lol . lol. JHan Mar 2017 #26
I just think people are not thinking about the full import underthematrix Mar 2017 #27
I guess it was up to someone to post the stupidest OP of the day. JTFrog Mar 2017 #28
+1000 Pachamama Mar 2017 #43
She suggested he leaked them himself, but she overhyped. Alice11111 Mar 2017 #30
First, Get Ready To Be Attacked Just For Asking Questions... LovingA2andMI Mar 2017 #31
That's a ridiculous post from someone who admits to not having watched her show for the last OnDoutside Mar 2017 #32
Huh umm.... LovingA2andMI Mar 2017 #34
Ummm Rachel DID enhance the story, by putting it in context, in a step by step manner. It is not OnDoutside Mar 2017 #36
Like the DNC emails on Wikileaks? BainsBane Mar 2017 #41
Your bias is both creative and imaginative... LanternWaste Mar 2017 #57
And such a "Bias"... LovingA2andMI Mar 2017 #60
Rachel is a Republican..... DFW Mar 2017 #37
I think she's a liberal who became a well paid television personality DefenseLawyer Mar 2017 #38
No, she is not. How silly. cwydro Mar 2017 #39
I have serious doubts as to weather GWC58 Mar 2017 #40
She is a very firm progressive. always has been. sarah FAILIN Mar 2017 #42
yeah that is probably a big part of it Kimchijeon Mar 2017 #44
2016 returns NewRedDawn Mar 2017 #45
She is a member of NBC and THEY gave us Trump more than any other network. They want RATINGS LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #46
No and these threads are getting ridiculous TNLib Mar 2017 #48
LOL! mcar Mar 2017 #49
Well, Trump is not the billionaire he claims to be C_U_L8R Mar 2017 #51
Ah, now I understand some of the other posts I've been seeing today. herding cats Mar 2017 #52
WTF? Ilsa Mar 2017 #53
Seems she didn't have time to review it. Must've gotten a call it was coming... brush Mar 2017 #54
Does green cheese smell better on Mercury, and is it as wonderful to bathe in as alleged? LanternWaste Mar 2017 #59
She works for a huge corporate media conglomerate-NBC-which is owned by Comcast. jalan48 Mar 2017 #62
True. But no. She is trying to turn the world around on a string show. It was overplayed. The Wielding Truth Mar 2017 #78
What a dumb post Dem2 Mar 2017 #63
She may have hyped it..but the asshole in the WH had to responded to it.... Historic NY Mar 2017 #64
Wow. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2017 #65
lol no fishwax Mar 2017 #66
So shooting yourself in the foot is a GOOD thing now? You're going to dis the Squinch Mar 2017 #67
Ratings. They must of been Huge frankieallen Mar 2017 #69
Could liberals go for more than a day without shooting themselves in the foot? Paladin Mar 2017 #70
Could some DUers actually be that dumb? Hekate Mar 2017 #73
This was not a non-story Zambero Mar 2017 #76
She wanted to get people to watch TexasBushwhacker Mar 2017 #77
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could Rachel actually be ...»Reply #28