Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
34. IMO your argument would make much more
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 04:33 PM
Jun 2012

sense if the offender were 20 years older than she is. Equal justice under law is a fundamental principle of justice for adults.

But the girl is only 13, and the sentence was imposed in Juvenile Court. Don't kids deserve second chances after making mistakes? And don't the categories of adult jurisprudence often fail to captute the essence of youthful offenses? The 13-year old was charged with assault. But, just like a current Presidential candidate, she used a pair of scissors, not a baseball bat or brass knuckles.

Applied to kids, the logic of your argument would give eight-year-olds police rap sheets for "assault" for school-yard tussles. That actually happens in "zero tolerance" districts where local police, rather than School District safety personnel, are posted inside schools. Kids get labeled and groomed for iives of imprisonment before they even reach seventh grade.

I don't think a Gilbert & Sullivan choice is going to do the trick. no_hypocrisy Jun 2012 #1
I'm all for creative sentencing tawadi Jun 2012 #3
Weird Willard's lucky he didn't face that judge. Octafish Jun 2012 #2
so does her mother. iemitsu Jun 2012 #4
Yes, counseling would be a more appropriate ruling. eom tawadi Jun 2012 #5
Uhm, how is it that the mother/guardian/sitter isn't being held responsible Lionessa Jun 2012 #6
Good question. eom tawadi Jun 2012 #7
I too wonder where the mother was SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #8
I'm more concerned that a 13-year old is making phone calls with threats of tammywammy Jun 2012 #9
That leaped out at me too Aerows Jun 2012 #107
That's another issue entirely. Not part of the 13-yo's criminal proceedings. kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #10
Cutting of a 3yos hair is what the charge is, according to the OPs excerpt. Lionessa Jun 2012 #12
Play palace? abelenkpe Jun 2012 #15
It shouldn't, imo, and I believe there are signs specifically saying not to leave children unattende Lionessa Jun 2012 #125
Please tell me you are not that obtuse. joeglow3 Jun 2012 #135
For a 3 year old, it's not obtuse. They don't need chains, but parents should be have LOS at every Lionessa Jun 2012 #139
Great, I'll have to tell my two and a half year old not to go down the spiral slide anymore snooper2 Jun 2012 #144
Okay then be a ridiculously exaggerative poster then. Lionessa Jun 2012 #157
"should be have LOS at every moment" your words snooper2 Jun 2012 #158
Nit picking. Please define a moment. Lionessa Jun 2012 #159
Well, since I'm in telecom a moment is a pretty small period of time snooper2 Jun 2012 #161
Children are not unattended abelenkpe Jun 2012 #150
The 13 year-old committed a crime. sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #44
Age 13 is not a child, but a out of control young teenager!. My Mom always crunch60 Jun 2012 #116
Separate issue and not part of the story nadinbrzezinski Jun 2012 #58
At most partially responsible. After all, it is no defense to a crime... Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #103
Oops. posted twice.nt Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #104
Kids are sneaky.... blueamy66 Jun 2012 #174
Because their guardian didn't commit the assault Scootaloo Jun 2012 #176
NO. I'm tired of lazy, distracted parents getting off after not doing their jobs. Lionessa Jun 2012 #180
Know what you sound like? Scootaloo Jun 2012 #182
No, I don't. Republicans are the ones who like to fry children for criminal offenses, and send Lionessa Jun 2012 #183
Yes, I'm afraid you do Scootaloo Jun 2012 #184
Then be afraid, be very afraid, because you're just typing excuses for adults, Lionessa Jun 2012 #185
Fine by me. It's a choice, not a requirement. NYC Liberal Jun 2012 #11
Right, it's not like cutting off hands tawadi Jun 2012 #13
Probably not as intimidating as being a 3 year old and having two older kids cut off a chunk of hair SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #17
Would cutting off a young girls hair in a courtroom have a positive impact? tawadi Jun 2012 #22
Perhaps SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #24
Punishment is punishment. It's not rehabilitation. Sounds like a good idea to me. nt Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #105
intimidation only applies to perps then? this kid can learn how the other side roguevalley Jun 2012 #117
I've heard that in some original, intact cultures BanzaiBonnie Jun 2012 #14
I like your attitude. ZombieHorde Jun 2012 #21
seems fair. Liberal_in_LA Jun 2012 #16
Sounds fair to me. HappyMe Jun 2012 #18
If the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against "unusual" punishments is still applicable in Utah, AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #19
Your argument is baseless SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #20
Giving a choice between an excessive punishment and an unusual one is a violation of the AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #25
Please SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #26
Under a literal reading (which you imply is the only appropriate interpretation), the 8th Amend AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #32
Is this merely your opinon, or can you cite precedent for your assertion? cherokeeprogressive Jun 2012 #27
You are right in the sense that giving a choice would raise a presumption that the second punishment AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #28
Just as I thought SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #30
Just a cursory search on google returns the following SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #39
As you observed, "Only a truly outrageous alternative sentence for a relatively minor crime would be AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #62
I didn't make the assertion, YOU did. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2012 #63
You, not I stated, "and how can it be stated without doubt that the second punishment is always AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #69
That's an awful lot of words when all you needed to say is cherokeeprogressive Jun 2012 #75
You're referring to yourself as having fun. Are you saying that you're a troll? AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #110
One doesn't need to be a troll in order to cherokeeprogressive Jun 2012 #113
Classic response to getting your ass handed to you joeglow3 Jun 2012 #137
IMO your argument would make much more ProgressiveEconomist Jun 2012 #34
You're right that the law sometimes treats the Constitutional rights of adults different than minors AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #49
That's a good point treestar Jun 2012 #67
The protection is against "cruel AND unusual punishment" not cruel OR unusual. morningfog Jun 2012 #114
What the judge did was both "cruel AND unusual." AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #115
He gave her the choice. She could have just taken the full community service time. morningfog Jun 2012 #119
A great many other people posting on this board think that the choice was given to the mother: AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #123
A little unusual yes, but certainly not cruel. When the 13 year old looks in crunch60 Jun 2012 #121
The Constitution JonLP24 Jun 2012 #134
The Supreme Court was spent a couple of centuries morningfog Jun 2012 #149
So when there was no DP JonLP24 Jun 2012 #153
I've seen many young kids from the youth authority, conventional punishment crunch60 Jun 2012 #120
Seems fair to me. blueamy66 Jun 2012 #23
I agree 100%. OrwellwasRight Jun 2012 #29
No, assaulting children is not justice. EFerrari Jun 2012 #33
Her mother cutting her hair is assault? n/t tammywammy Jun 2012 #35
What part of violence doesn't teach empathy is unclear? EFerrari Jun 2012 #38
The 13 year old cutting the 3 year old's hair was assault tammywammy Jun 2012 #42
You don't teach a kid respect for other people's boundaries EFerrari Jun 2012 #47
This kid already has plenty of problems. HappyMe Jun 2012 #52
So, giving her one more will fix her? EFerrari Jun 2012 #56
So, what? HappyMe Jun 2012 #64
I love the way defenders of shaming children as a teaching tool EFerrari Jun 2012 #65
The mother made the choice SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #71
Right, parents are never intimidated by anyone and always make good choices, EFerrari Jun 2012 #76
Intimidated by what? SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #81
Where was the parent of the 13 year old while she was lopping off blueamy66 Jun 2012 #128
Good question. HappyMe Jun 2012 #136
Shaming children? blueamy66 Jun 2012 #175
Please point to the post where I said all children are innocent babies. Thanks. EFerrari Jun 2012 #178
maybe I missed something blueamy66 Jun 2012 #179
Then the mother shouldn't have done it SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #46
That's right. The mother shouldn't have done it. EFerrari Jun 2012 #53
It would appear that way SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #57
Nobody has assaulted the defendant. blueamy66 Jun 2012 #37
Having your hair cut by court order is an assault on your physical integrity. EFerrari Jun 2012 #41
The 13 year old girl assaulted a 3 year old. HappyMe Jun 2012 #45
Oh, for Christsake. Yes, get her counseling where she will have to deal with EFerrari Jun 2012 #50
Her mother chose the punishment. HappyMe Jun 2012 #55
That would be the mother of a girl who attacked a 3 year old with scissors? EFerrari Jun 2012 #60
Oh please. blueamy66 Jun 2012 #130
You seem to be admiting to poor impulse control, amy. EFerrari Jun 2012 #168
so you agree with me blueamy66 Jun 2012 #169
So I have poor impulse control. Or it could be called LOVE. blueamy66 Jun 2012 #173
Her hair wasn't cut by court order SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #48
So what would you suggest as appropriate justice for this dysfunctional duo? crunch60 Jun 2012 #122
she is 13, not 11 blueamy66 Jun 2012 #129
If it was assault to cut the 3 yos, how is it not assault to force cut the 13yos? Lionessa Jun 2012 #140
For the same reason that a prison is legal but locking someone in your basement is not (nt) jeff47 Jun 2012 #163
Sounds like an UNFORGETTABLE lesson in the Golden Rule ProgressiveEconomist Jun 2012 #31
Of course it's retribution. EFerrari Jun 2012 #36
Hurting them? SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #51
How confusing though, when she's being accused of assault for cutting hair w/out permission Lionessa Jun 2012 #142
'teach children compassion'. I don't think that's possible ProgressiveEconomist Jun 2012 #68
Wtf? All children LEARN compassion EFerrari Jun 2012 #79
great post blueamy66 Jun 2012 #40
The Golden Rule is an application of SYMMETRY ProgressiveEconomist Jun 2012 #61
Yes, I was raised that way. blueamy66 Jun 2012 #186
Contributing to social rituals bears absolutely no relation EFerrari Jun 2012 #43
You don't think she should be ashamed of what she did? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #54
It's not that. EFerrari Jun 2012 #59
I disagree cabot Jun 2012 #66
No, shame is toxic to the emotional development of human beings. EFerrari Jun 2012 #72
Children are not precious little snowflakes who will melt via shame cabot Jun 2012 #77
I was raised a girl in a Latino Catholic family so you have nothin' on me. EFerrari Jun 2012 #89
He makes them work for a particular flower shop? Does he have any ownership interest in the AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #94
WHY SHAMING DOESN'T WORK EFerrari Jun 2012 #70
We'll just have to disagree cabot Jun 2012 #73
Feeling ashamed over something you have done EFerrari Jun 2012 #74
You're conflating shame and guilt backscatter712 Jun 2012 #124
From your post SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #78
Exactly! cabot Jun 2012 #82
Being shown how others feel is not the same as EFerrari Jun 2012 #83
Trauma? SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #90
Does Shaming Children Have the Opposite Effect? EFerrari Jun 2012 #92
Feel free, post it all you want SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #93
"Little monster"? Really? EFerrari Jun 2012 #95
Yep, little monster SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #96
Yep, she is a monster. blueamy66 Jun 2012 #187
I actually agree with this article: ProgressiveEconomist Jun 2012 #80
I can and I did tawadi Jun 2012 #84
What, in your mind, would have been a proper punishment for this assault? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #87
Counseling tawadi Jun 2012 #88
So you don't believe there should be any punishment for the assault of a toddler? SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #91
Working with victims of crime is also called community service. eom tawadi Jun 2012 #99
Community service is not a punishment SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #100
I'm with you SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #85
Because there are endless ways to help the older kid empathize EFerrari Jun 2012 #86
If shame works to control behavior, that's good enough. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #101
It doesn't. That's the point. EFerrari Jun 2012 #126
The best you can hope for is to control negative behavior until their brains are fully formed. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #138
Between letting kids practice bad behavior & shaming, there are a lot of measures that can be taken. EFerrari Jun 2012 #146
Shame is an inherent feature. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #151
Shame may be inherent but shaming is not, no. EFerrari Jun 2012 #155
The brains are the same from childhood to adolescence... lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #160
I don't recall claiming we can reason with kids as we can with adults. EFerrari Jun 2012 #162
No, you said that we can teach empathy. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #164
Actually, I said violence doesn't teach empathy. EFerrari Jun 2012 #165
Hitting with a 2x4 and a judge cutting a deal involving a ponytail are qualitatively different. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #172
She probably got the idea of cutting off someones hair as a prank from Romney. Auntie Bush Jun 2012 #97
Doubtful SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #98
+1000000 L0oniX Jun 2012 #148
Whole big pieces of weird / dark context missing from this story. DirkGently Jun 2012 #102
I'm wondering why the mother hadn't already done that before they got to court. Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #106
So, you'd teach your kid to do better EFerrari Jun 2012 #166
Yep. Nothing makes a kid realize what it feels like to be on the end of damage.... Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #171
Sounds like my Mom. blueamy66 Jun 2012 #188
This ruling kind of reminds me of Judge Michael Cicconetti, the most bizzare judge ever AJTheMan Jun 2012 #108
Yep. He's one of the gimmicky judges who enjoys publicity and self-promotion. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #111
Or Larry Seidlin, the judge who started weeping as the Anna Nicole Smith trial was being decided nt AJTheMan Jun 2012 #112
13 years old Daninmo Jun 2012 #109
I don't have any problem with her ponytial cut off either. LisaL Jun 2012 #133
I hate it when thirteen-year-olds act like the Republican nominee for President. Vattel Jun 2012 #118
I was going to say why not, its not mandatory clang1 Jun 2012 #127
key phrase: "Lopan and an 11-year-old friend met a 3-year-old girl at a McDonald's" SoCalDem Jun 2012 #131
Many McDonalds LisaL Jun 2012 #132
Ours had one as well, but when my boys played there SoCalDem Jun 2012 #141
I see from 2-14 in there all the time snooper2 Jun 2012 #145
This thread is full of excellent arguments against such a punishment but crim son Jun 2012 #143
That would be just repeating and re-enforcing the original trauma. EFerrari Jun 2012 #167
The Twilight wormhole tawadi Jun 2012 #190
So the punishment is assault for assault ....pffft another fucked up judge, L0oniX Jun 2012 #147
The whole idea of any kind of sentence, light or severe, for a 13 year old is ludicrous Sanity Claws Jun 2012 #152
I can see the point of people that don't agree with the ponytail being cut off SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #170
Really? blueamy66 Jun 2012 #189
The mom is just as sick as the child ecstatic Jun 2012 #154
Seems like the shaming began with the release of the juvenile's identity. bluedigger Jun 2012 #156
the girl has some really deep issues that won`t be resolved by this action madrchsod Jun 2012 #177
This is screwy. xxqqqzme Jun 2012 #181
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge: 13-year-old girl g...»Reply #34