General Discussion

whathehell

(29,050 posts)

101. Sure.

Reply to apocalypsehow (Reply #93)

Thu Jun 21, 2012, 03:44 PM

Jun 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

122 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Societies that ban Porn treat women really well [View all] cthulu2016 Jun 2012 OP

Denmark and Norway both banned sexual objectification in ads seabeyond Jun 2012 #1

A smart and civilized move...Good on them. whathehell Jun 2012 #17

A smart and civilized move...Good on them. clang1 Jun 2012 #33

some of the best porn comes from denmark and norway datasuspect Jun 2012 #41

They haven't banned porn obamanut2012 Jun 2012 #49

I think your post doesn't have enough momentum to break through the reality distortion field. 2ndAmForComputers Jun 2012 #59

Whoopee - another porn thread. DURHAM D Jun 2012 #2

lol quinnox Jun 2012 #4

Yay ! whathehell Jun 2012 #12

Yee Haw! UnrepentantLiberal Jun 2012 #81

Is that true? Rex Jun 2012 #3

Of course not! cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #6

Not rape and assault porn. No. Fawke Em Jun 2012 #10

that's a myth, I believe reorg Jun 2012 #26

The "snuff" hoax should have been a credibility-ender for many cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #28

If you're just going to make stuff up cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #27

Are you saying porn is part of the whole freedom of choice thing? Zalatix Jun 2012 #25

Think of the places that have a very regressive view of nudity/sex/porn 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #53

Do any societies actually ban porn? sadbear Jun 2012 #5

I don't know the difference JonLP24 Jun 2012 #58

Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore... metalbot Jun 2012 #61

No one wants to ban porn; however, many feminists Fawke Em Jun 2012 #7

This really isn't very hard to understand. EOTE Jun 2012 #39

+1 hifiguy Jun 2012 #50

Because all those other things you mention are simulated 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #54

The Taliban would agree with you quinnox Jun 2012 #8

Refighting the DU porn wars of 2007 is NOT a good idea bluestateguy Jun 2012 #9

There was a Porn War in 2007? Rex Jun 2012 #11

A porn war 5 years ago GObamaGO Jun 2012 #13

What if they gave a porn war... Dr. Strange Jun 2012 #44

LOL! Javaman Jun 2012 #47

DUZY!!! obamanut2012 Jun 2012 #52

What if they made porn whathehell Jun 2012 #119

Who won? DURHAM D Jun 2012 #16

Pah. More like, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, late 2011 Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #36

Who do I see about fitting pitbulls into the next schedule? FSogol Jun 2012 #46

LMAO GObamaGO Jun 2012 #48

Would showing porn at the Olive Garden... FrodosPet Jun 2012 #66

That has been tried-However, when the issues are muddled, people forget which side they're supposed Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #117

That's funny! You left out Indigo Children, though. yardwork Jun 2012 #116

Begun the porn wars have . . . 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #55

Ah, like Saudi Arabia! backscatter712 Jun 2012 #14

ok then, afghanistan now we have liberated them nt msongs Jun 2012 #15

In 2005, I saw Afghan guys get all hot and bothered... Comrade Grumpy Jun 2012 #113

No, like Denmark and Norway! whathehell Jun 2012 #20

It goes to demonstrate the correlation between porn and violence against women... backscatter712 Jun 2012 #22

No, I don't think so.. whathehell Jun 2012 #23

Yes, very much so. EOTE Jun 2012 #67

Disingenuous isn't just a river in Egypt cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #24

No, it's the sewer that runs from the vinyard of sour grapes, lol. whathehell Jun 2012 #31

Both Denmark and Norway have free and open access to pornography. EOTE Jun 2012 #40

You don't understand what Whathehell is saying. shcrane71 Jun 2012 #51

I very well do. EOTE Jun 2012 #57

I'm afraid you very well don't. whathehell Jun 2012 #63

You're more than welcome to actually SAY when you mean, rather than making vague allusions. EOTE Jun 2012 #65

I have no idea what "vague allusions" you're referring to, whathehell Jun 2012 #69

You're interested enough to respond. EOTE Jun 2012 #70

Whatever. In any case, it's clear you're far more interested than I am, and that being reality, whathehell Jun 2012 #76

Yet another brilliant post of immense substance! EOTE Jun 2012 #80

Brilliance isn't generally perceived by mediocrity. whathehell Jun 2012 #102

I'll ask you once again, in all honesty... EOTE Jun 2012 #104

And your responses are quite hilarious. EOTE Jun 2012 #107

Glad you enjoyed them! whathehell Jun 2012 #111

No more smilies and snark? Whatever will I do? EOTE Jun 2012 #114

If you go back to the post to which I responded, you'll see I wasn't speaking of pornography here whathehell Jun 2012 #62

The post you responded to was #14, where the poster talks about Saudi Arabia banning pornography. EOTE Jun 2012 #64

Neither Denmark nor Norway have banned porn in the slightest. apocalypsehow Jun 2012 #92

She'll tell you that that's not the point. EOTE Jun 2012 #98

They found porn at OBL's house. tabatha Jun 2012 #18

There was some "live" porn going on at the White House once upon a time. L0oniX Jun 2012 #60

Apparently porn is widely available in Arab countries, even though it is banned. tabatha Jun 2012 #19

Do you dare suggest that prohibition doesn't work? Incitatus Jun 2012 #21

Hmm..Let's think about that for a moment.. whathehell Jun 2012 #29

thank you. why do they keep ignoring that point? LiberalLoner Jun 2012 #32

This message was self-deleted by its author whathehell Jun 2012 #34

You're welcome and you ask an excellent question whathehell Jun 2012 #35

Well said. Exactly the point. n/t DLevine Jun 2012 #37

Thank you. n/t whathehell Jun 2012 #43

prohibition and social pressure are two different things RainDog Jun 2012 #38

Yes. The thing is, I didn't introduce that concept into the discussion. whathehell Jun 2012 #42

Your post, #29 states RainDog Jun 2012 #94

The key is "for all practical purposes"....Perhaps I should have put quote marks around whathehell Jun 2012 #100

No racial slurs in public? jeff47 Jun 2012 #73

Any other hairs you'd like to split? whathehell Jun 2012 #78

It's splitting hairs to point out your post is completely wrong? jeff47 Jun 2012 #85

Um, that's not what you did whathehell Jun 2012 #105

This has got to be one of the most absurd false analogies I've ever seen spun on DU. n/t. apocalypsehow Jun 2012 #93

Sure. whathehell Jun 2012 #101

Cuba flamingdem Jun 2012 #30

same w/ the soviet union BOG PERSON Jun 2012 #68

Locking. Please repost in the newest forum: General Discussion-Porn FSogol Jun 2012 #45

the most crowded forum lame54 Jun 2012 #74

Well we have the First Amendment, so we cannot ban it, treestar Jun 2012 #56

...... whathehell Jun 2012 #118

Societies that ban women treat porn really well undeterred Jun 2012 #71

excellent logic you've got going there, and of course no on is calling for a ban StarryNight Jun 2012 #72

It certainly does test the theory that porn leads to dehumanizing women which leads to 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #75

The most pertinent point, IMO, was the "countries that ban porn = Women as 3rd class citizens" whathehell Jun 2012 #82

However 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #83

Yes, I think we're all aware of that. whathehell Jun 2012 #89

It's interesting 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #90

Okay, I'm about done with you, but whathehell Jun 2012 #97

Er, you kinda ignored my point 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #106

Er, you kinda ignored mine as well. whathehell Jun 2012 #108

Tschüss 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #109

Well, in his defense... EOTE Jun 2012 #110

Well, in mine whathehell Jun 2012 #112

I thought I wasn't going to get blessed with your insightful posts anymore? EOTE Jun 2012 #115

The INHERENT connection is personal freedom and privacy cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #87

Excellent post that ties all of the theoretical threads hifiguy Jun 2012 #88

Sorry, but that's not an "inherent" connection, it's a LEGAL one, and as such whathehell Jun 2012 #91

You're missing the point. hifiguy Jun 2012 #95

No, you're missing mine whathehell Jun 2012 #99

Thank you. n/t whathehell Jun 2012 #79

Thank you...Most men here react to negative commentary on ANY sort of porn like the prototypical whathehell Jun 2012 #120

Post hoc ergo prompter hoc. LanternWaste Jun 2012 #77

No, you are mistaken cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #86

The word "therefore" is not necc if it is implied. LanternWaste Jun 2012 #96

Now you add mind-reading cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #103

like they do in China? hobbit709 Jun 2012 #84

This message was self-deleted by its author creatives4innovation Jan 2016 #121

Sad creatives4innovation Jan 2016 #122