Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
28. Why is it always us and ONLY us that has to "compete"?
Thu Dec 29, 2011, 09:23 AM
Dec 2011

Why does no one ever tell the wealthy, like they tell the rest of us, "Life is tough. You have to accept and know what it's like to fail; otherwise, you'll become complacent and never get anywhere"?

Why is there no notion of "Cooperation"? Everything has to be about a contest and it's done us zero good in 30 years.

The thing about it is, I don't need to hear "solutions" from a guy who's pretty much never really had to work hard to get where he is in life, never really had to struggle, has networking skills and fell into all the right jobs (and eventually, married the right person). I don't think a person such as that should deem himself such an authority as to what American workers have to do to better themselves. I might as well listen to an Ovarian Lottery winner like Steve Forbes on the subject; it'd make about as much sense.

Friedman always tends to ignore the giant-elephant factors of wage stagnation, astronomical college costs, unrealistic expectations of Corporate America, unrealistic odds of "Horatio Alger" type success and just plain-and-simple bad luck.

Bullshit Prophet 451 Dec 2011 #1
Well I guess if you think it's Government's role to prevent people from becoming exceedingly wealthy dkf Dec 2011 #4
No, I think it is government's role... Prophet 451 Dec 2011 #6
It's not Government's role to prevent people from becoming exceedingly wealthy yodermon Dec 2011 #10
The government's role is what we, the citizens, say is its role. Fool Count Dec 2011 #30
Then it would seem that not enough of us have been saying that .... oldhippie Dec 2011 #34
Obviously. But that's your, Americans, problem. I live in Australia Fool Count Dec 2011 #37
It is government's role to keep thieves from stealing you blind. tsuki Dec 2011 #44
People Are Becoming Exceedingly Wealthy Because of the Fed's Loose Monetary Policies Yavin4 Dec 2011 #17
No, it's supposed to prevent income inequality from becoming too eridani Dec 2011 #20
What happens in a global world where there isn't one central government? dkf Dec 2011 #27
Obviously, there needs to be a central world government oldhippie Dec 2011 #35
Hmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your news letter. leeroysphitz Dec 2011 #42
well, that's falling into the new world order meme newspeak Dec 2011 #49
The governments that exist should then take the responsibility eridani Dec 2011 #43
Not exactly bullshit. Zalatix Dec 2011 #23
It's Illogical for Everyone to be Above Average Yavin4 Dec 2011 #2
Correct. Dawson Leery Dec 2011 #5
A functioning economy has to accomodate the F student. The majority are, by definition, C students. saras Dec 2011 #26
What a tool. girl gone mad Dec 2011 #3
Yet a person who sells to the world has opportunities beyond what they used to. dkf Dec 2011 #7
You're absolutely right, but ... dawg Dec 2011 #11
Friedman Uses a Fluke Example like Rowling and Presents It as if it's a Norm Yavin4 Dec 2011 #18
I've never been impressed with Friedman. dawg Dec 2011 #8
so by friendman, most of us are average newspeak Dec 2011 #50
Do I have to explain YET AGAIN why this guy is the most ginormous tool walking? HughBeaumont Dec 2011 #9
First of all price is a big part of being competitive. dkf Dec 2011 #12
I wonder how many Friedman Units until the entire world becomes Lake Wobegon? Fumesucker Dec 2011 #13
Why is it always us and ONLY us that has to "compete"? HughBeaumont Dec 2011 #28
IT Outsourcing to India Exists Solely Because of Cost, Not the Talent Level of Indian ITers Yavin4 Dec 2011 #19
Ding Ding Ding.....we have a winner......... Burma Jones Dec 2011 #33
K & R'ing your comment... freshwest Dec 2011 #21
That it why it is completely insane to exboyfil Dec 2011 #29
Shh thom over here nadinbrzezinski Dec 2011 #14
that sounds like something someone who enjoys listening to their own voice would say JI7 Dec 2011 #15
and yet if some CEO from some large Corp loses money they end up with millions of dollars JI7 Dec 2011 #16
Yeesh MFrohike Dec 2011 #22
Yes! HangOnKids Dec 2011 #38
Friedman supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Ichingcarpenter Dec 2011 #24
So, we all have to write Harry Potter... but, if we all did JCMach1 Dec 2011 #25
Somehow being well below average didn't prevent Friedman personally from enjoying Fool Count Dec 2011 #31
Horseshit. RUMMYisFROSTED Dec 2011 #32
Is Jamie Dimon richer than JK Rowling? dkf Dec 2011 #36
Who said it was wealth? RUMMYisFROSTED Dec 2011 #46
Being average.. sendero Dec 2011 #39
He Hit The Marriage Lottery! HangOnKids Dec 2011 #40
What a load of codswallop n/t Spazito Dec 2011 #41
I don't think I care for this man's ideas. Burgman Dec 2011 #45
How does Mr. Friedman justify his continuing employment in a money-losing endeavor, then? Romulox Dec 2011 #47
The entire world is run by "C" students. Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #48
it's amazing that one fekkin apologist for the 1% newspeak Dec 2011 #51
Tom Friedman has been wrong on everything he has ever said..... lib2DaBone Dec 2011 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thomas Friedman on hyper ...»Reply #28