General Discussion

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)

1. Did you send this to her?

Reply to Firebrand Gary (Original post)

Wed Nov 23, 2016, 07:42 AM

Nov 2016

If you have her email address I would love to have it. I want to send her a similar letter.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

158 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary, for GODS SAKE CHALLENGE THE ELECTION RESULTS! [View all] Firebrand Gary Nov 2016 OP

Did you send this to her? Control-Z Nov 2016 #1

I don't know if it's still being used, or monitored, or even read, but Amimnoch Nov 2016 #8

Do you have a mobile friendly link? SHRED Nov 2016 #82

Can the Justice Department call for a recount if they suspect improprieties? mfcorey1 Nov 2016 #2

No. brooklynite Nov 2016 #3

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2016 #89

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2016 #90

Ignorant troll!!! mfcorey1 Nov 2016 #91

Just served on that jury. MineralMan Nov 2016 #93

I did too. MADem Nov 2016 #94

Yup. Takes a few minutes for MineralMan Nov 2016 #96

He paid to be a star member to post foolishness. Another trumper surfaces, who is so much mfcorey1 Nov 2016 #95

No doubt. What a maroon! MineralMan Nov 2016 #97

President Obama, Hillary, Sanders, Biden etc have... Mike Nelson Nov 2016 #4

dems need to show they'll get their backs and until we certainot Nov 2016 #83

For me it was the major clue. byronius Nov 2016 #99

Sooo...you want her to do what we all said Trump would do? cwydro Nov 2016 #5

Yes, I want her to challenge the results. Firebrand Gary Nov 2016 #6

I feel pretty confident that the Clintons, cwydro Nov 2016 #111

We already have proof of election rigging in Wisconsin with the federal courts decision that Augiedog Nov 2016 #21

That ruling is about House seats, has nothing to do with the statewide Presidential vote. nt kelly1mm Nov 2016 #74

You do realize SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #118

Yes, of course. I am making a general observation. Where there is smoke there is fire. Augiedog Nov 2016 #121

If there is evidence of course treestar Nov 2016 #32

ENTIRELY different. Allowing this election to be STOLEN Hortensis Nov 2016 #61

"If we don't, then what?" Then the Democratic Party will be wiped off the political map for a BlueCaliDem Nov 2016 #106

Don't forget the millennials and youngers. They'll Hortensis Nov 2016 #125

What does it matter if more people vote if election machines are hacked by malware, uploaded by BlueCaliDem Nov 2016 #141

I share your worries, but all changes cause their own changes. Hortensis Nov 2016 #154

I NEVER gave a vote of confidence to hackable machines. nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #124

Yes, it's totally different when our side acts like petulant children. name not needed Nov 2016 #135

Lol. cwydro Nov 2016 #138

Prefer president trump over a stolen outcome and I wish the right wing base was equally patriotic lostnfound Nov 2016 #142

If trump called for a recount on his loss, I'd be fine with that bhikkhu Nov 2016 #147

Is there ANY doubt the GOP would challenge if it were the other way? n/t HAB911 Nov 2016 #7

No..and Hell No! whathehell Nov 2016 #15

If we're ever going to get to the bottom of voter purges, fraud, disenfranchisement bucolic_frolic Nov 2016 #9

The fact they wanted us to accept the results immediately is very fishy to me Feeling the Bern Nov 2016 #10

Yes....Why are the dems always so loathe to fight? whathehell Nov 2016 #14

Thank YOU! smirkymonkey Nov 2016 #16

exactly we have to be rude and be obstructionists like they were bdamomma Nov 2016 #23

This treestar Nov 2016 #33

Democrats better fight fire with fire workinclasszero Nov 2016 #45

My pleasure! whathehell Nov 2016 #29

And here is what happens if dem roll over yet again.. pangaia Nov 2016 #113

I agree Generator Nov 2016 #130

Gore, Kerry, Clinton - too polite to fight for our country when we've been wronged. milestogo Nov 2016 #80

It's too early to count Clinton out.. whathehell Nov 2016 #114

I must agree. byronius Nov 2016 #100

Yes and that's ridiculously 'penny wise and pound foolish" whathehell Nov 2016 #116

To top it off they say the message they got was they were too Liberal. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2016 #136

I haven't heard that one.. whathehell Nov 2016 #155

I know a couple of really annoying Hillary supporters.... Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2016 #156

2000 all over again. How many more times?? ALL HAND COUNTING NOW!! nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #126

Democrats never fight election fraud it seems. Cobalt Violet Nov 2016 #11

It's not just election fraud. They don't fight on any issue. Chakab Nov 2016 #35

NC is stinking up the house too. barbtries Nov 2016 #12

I get Obama wanting a smooth transition of power, and I get how it would appear hypocritical if -Steph- Nov 2016 #13

1000 smirkymonkey Nov 2016 #17

It's not about what's "convenient" for him or anyone else.. whathehell Nov 2016 #18

Where is Hillary? She should be out in front of this... here's hopin she'll step up. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2016 #64

AbSolUteLy! whathehell Nov 2016 #115

Couldnt agree more. His day is soon over. Dr. Mullion Blasto Nov 2016 #86

Yes whathehell Nov 2016 #117

Something seems very wrong to me. we can do it Nov 2016 #148

I agree and dont care how it looks. libtodeath Nov 2016 #19

(weeping) librechik Nov 2016 #20

yes we are Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #25

I agree with everyone but compsports Nov 2016 #22

It should be challenged for every American. But is not a factor. lonestarnot Nov 2016 #26

Can they really be so stupid as to not see what is at stake? Richard D Nov 2016 #24

Yes. Challenge Comrade Casino and his Russo-Republican cronies Achilleaze Nov 2016 #27

Not for YOU, Hillary lake loon Nov 2016 #28

We would suffer right along with her if she took office loyalsister Nov 2016 #31

She does not deserve the kind of misery that would bring loyalsister Nov 2016 #30

Do we deserve the destruction of a Bettie Nov 2016 #39

Do you really believe that he has the chance of COLGATE4 Nov 2016 #109

This message was self-deleted by its author loyalsister Nov 2016 #110

I think you meant to respond to another poster. COLGATE4 Nov 2016 #119

Sorry about that loyalsister Nov 2016 #122

Are people really this clueless as to how it looks to be screaming about this.. vi5 Nov 2016 #34

If we ignore the issues it will just continue for the next election JonLP24 Nov 2016 #75

1 way to do that... vi5 Nov 2016 #76

So, if it's close we should just live with it being stolen? bigmonkey Nov 2016 #152

yep; this is already the second time. how many more???!! nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #128

How it looks???! maybe some people should learn a lesson - machines are hackable. duh. nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #127

I did quite a bit of research and analysis on Pennsylvania count totals yesterday... cbdo2007 Nov 2016 #36

Occam's Razor hueymahl Nov 2016 #38

Occam's Razor is not a scientific principle. athena Nov 2016 #47

Did not know we were talking science or Quantum Mechanics hueymahl Nov 2016 #48

Statistics is not philosopy. Election fraud is not a philosophical question. athena Nov 2016 #50

Occam's Razor applies exactly to your situation hueymahl Nov 2016 #55

Once again, you're confused about the scientific method. athena Nov 2016 #58

I have enjoyed this dialog on the philosophy of science between the philosophers. Hugin Nov 2016 #84

1 uponit7771 Nov 2016 #53

Interesting underpants Nov 2016 #69

Coal. Ikonoklast Nov 2016 #120

Enough of the conspiracy theories hueymahl Nov 2016 #37

A party that can't beat a rival party with a buffoon like Trump as a presidential candidate Chakab Nov 2016 #40

Could not agree more. hueymahl Nov 2016 #41

maybe we did beat him; you never know when voting machines are hackable black boxes. nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #131

It's not a "conspiracy theory" Liberal In Texas Nov 2016 #43

Exactly. Let's not lower ourselves to Alex Jones Territory. hueymahl Nov 2016 #49

We saw with our own eyes and heard with our own ears. JTFrog Nov 2016 #60

All I am trying to do hueymahl Nov 2016 #88

Seems like you would rather everyone just shut up and sit down and not believe our own lying eyes. JTFrog Nov 2016 #92

There are suspicions based on electronic voting machines in Wi, which some say disappear jmg257 Nov 2016 #57

And I believe they used Comey to try to make people believe just that. JTFrog Nov 2016 #62

Comey definitely had an impact..seemed to confirm for a lot of people who would not support her. nt jmg257 Nov 2016 #63

I doubt many changed their vote. But that is certainly what they expect everyone to believe. JTFrog Nov 2016 #65

Good point, a perfect event to point to as "a reason why". Shoot even Hillary said it was big. jmg257 Nov 2016 #66

Exactly. nt JTFrog Nov 2016 #68

How do you propose to find "real evidence" without an investigation? athena Nov 2016 #46

I am not against an investigation hueymahl Nov 2016 #51

An investigation is what we all want. athena Nov 2016 #54

I can agree with that hueymahl Nov 2016 #56

In that case, we are in complete agreement. athena Nov 2016 #59

Actually it sounds looney to me to ignore the glaring discrepancies. nt JTFrog Nov 2016 #67

"when there is real evidence".. um you need an investigation to gather real evidence. yodermon Nov 2016 #78

Yes. This needs to be done. Liberal In Texas Nov 2016 #42

Well - some computer scientists did say some counties in Wisconsin were suspicious... jmg257 Nov 2016 #44

Fight, Hillary!!! Fight... hamsterjill Nov 2016 #52

Anybody know how much pressure is being put on her campaign? ffr Nov 2016 #70

if she isn't going to fight it RussBLib Nov 2016 #71

It's not for HER. lostnfound Nov 2016 #143

She said, "I'll never stop fighting for you". I expect more from her than a meek surrender. WheelWalker Nov 2016 #72

Al Gore 2000 said the same thing bucolic_frolic Nov 2016 #77

Al Gore had a different situation treestar Nov 2016 #103

YES! liberalla Nov 2016 #73

The election's not rigged bucolic_frolic Nov 2016 #79

don't forget Florida! imaginary girl Nov 2016 #81

Florida's results are already certified n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #87

Face it folks, America is dead. world wide wally Nov 2016 #85

And a part of "the plan" was to first discredit the term "rigged" just before the election LiberalLovinLug Nov 2016 #98

that is entirely possible, and plenty of naive fools here fell for it. nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #133

Exactly...it was a huge setup. HipChick Nov 2016 #137

now we know DonCoquixote Nov 2016 #101

Does Hillary have to do it? treestar Nov 2016 #102

Jill Stein can do it. athena Nov 2016 #146

So she was a candidate treestar Nov 2016 #149

It HAS to come from you. So for the sake of the United States future as a democracy, ASK. FailureToCommunicate Nov 2016 #104

We Must Finally Cry Foul colsohlibgal Nov 2016 #105

K & R Coyotl Nov 2016 #107

If she does issue a challenge, it can't come from her office. Aristus Nov 2016 #108

Jill Stein is doing it! athena Nov 2016 #145

Jill Stein prepares to request election recounts in battleground states blitzburgh55 Nov 2016 #112

George Takei tweeted about this a few hours ago. He posted a direct link to Silver Gaia Nov 2016 #129

Except she hates Clinton Generator Nov 2016 #132

I am very suspicious 😒 blue cat Nov 2016 #140

wish she would; but anybody at that level is bound to be a "team player," and wouldn't want to rock TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #123

Jill Stein is doing it for her! cilla4progress Nov 2016 #134

Here it is: athena Nov 2016 #139

Donations for Stein's recount are now over 1 million dollars in less than 6 hours! KatyBR Nov 2016 #144

Lost cause HipHipHillary Nov 2016 #157

Something's better than cilla4progress Nov 2016 #158

I'd sure like to see the election turned around. TonyCapo Nov 2016 #150

You don't think their internal exit polls showed this possible result? basselope Nov 2016 #151

I supported her with my voice and my money Tommy2Tone Nov 2016 #153