Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I know exactly the posters you're talking about. shcrane71 Jun 2012 #1
It is strange how passionate people can be when they have no clue what they are talking about Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #2
Been a lot of speculation about that. malthaussen Jun 2012 #4
"I'd take it in a heartbeat" zeemike Jun 2012 #9
I would not take it, but I would find out who they are and who they represent before saying no sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #14
I was being facetious, but malthaussen Jun 2012 #15
A republican 'for love' coming here to shut us up about election fraud? Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #19
For love of disrupting DU, Ghost. n/t malthaussen Jun 2012 #21
Go Google the term "post for money". Occulus Jun 2012 #74
Probably part of the advertising budget malthaussen Jun 2012 #75
I was thinking that they were social media marketers for ES&S or Diebold, or shcrane71 Jun 2012 #6
Funny, I was thinking the same thing. Ellipsis Jun 2012 #22
x2 AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #13
"WE KNOW we are right! Their reaction to our inquiries proves it!" Capt. Obvious Jun 2012 #3
If Republicans thought vote rigging was happening and it was not in their favor Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #7
BINGO! Quadruple Negative!!!!!! rgbecker Jun 2012 #10
Well if you think otherwise you are naive. zeemike Jun 2012 #5
"The solution is hard and it will require organization and leadership from the Dems." shcrane71 Jun 2012 #8
And the other thing is - it's not fifty fifty truedelphi Jun 2012 #32
Good point. zeemike Jun 2012 #40
k&r. robinlynne Jun 2012 #11
The reason the right wing nuts are passing the voter fraud laws state by state is just a ploy. Lint Head Jun 2012 #12
People use this as an excuse too often! We do not lose every election because.... Logical Jun 2012 #16
Strawman. No one is claiming that we do. n/t EFerrari Jun 2012 #18
when it is counted by private companies on secret software, we should all be asking questions Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #20
At least on our side, I believe we have been goaded into be the "government" party TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #17
Genius I say. I hope you have a lot of followers. -eom Huey P. Long Jun 2012 #41
When democracy is a facade Flint Stone Jun 2012 #23
I have different questions: Cary Jun 2012 #24
well, we must do something because their selfishness is harming millions of people Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #26
I agree 1,000%. Cary Jun 2012 #27
the people you describe are sociopaths. zeemike Jun 2012 #30
well what are we supposed to do to stop them? Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #48
Well it is far bigger than I can deal with zeemike Jun 2012 #57
Allow me to offer the response you're looking for... brooklynite Jun 2012 #25
It sure made it a heckuva lot easier with accuvote counters and central tabulators Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #28
Get your facts straight. Are you the zombie of we want peace? Ellipsis Jun 2012 #31
I said it's TECHNICALLY possible... brooklynite Jun 2012 #35
Wisconsin uses few touch screens... obvuscation is what I see from the ghost. Ellipsis Jun 2012 #39
I didn't say touch screens, paper ballots are put through accuvote counters Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #45
I fully support paper ballots hand counted at the precinct... But you mix your facts Ellipsis Jun 2012 #49
Here in New York we just had a LONG hand recount of a close State Senate Race... brooklynite Jun 2012 #55
Did the two counts match up? zeemike Jun 2012 #58
As Autorank pointed out to me once, the memory in an Op Scan tabulator is very easy EFerrari Jun 2012 #43
Ohio. EFerrari Jun 2012 #29
King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association v. Blackwell... still chugging away. Ellipsis Jun 2012 #34
You mean Strickland and Brown winning in 2006? brooklynite Jun 2012 #36
i mean Ohio 2004 which was the shame of the nation EFerrari Jun 2012 #38
yes Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #51
Nah, people will never forgive the candidate politicasista Jun 2012 #71
Well, Obama likes and respects him politicasista Jun 2012 #70
Thank you Brooklynite for some sanity in this thread longship Jun 2012 #33
That isn't sanity. That's denial. EFerrari Jun 2012 #37
exactly Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #47
What I look for is if the candidate protests the results Puzzledtraveller Jun 2012 #42
The process is more important than any one person. EFerrari Jun 2012 #44
John Kerry asked for money to fight the night before the election Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #46
Interesting blame game politicasista Jun 2012 #68
And if they don't, throw them under bus politicasista Jun 2012 #72
+2000 gazillion n/t GarroHorus Jun 2012 #52
Anytime the burden of proof is on those prohibited from access to it TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #65
"The lack of evidence is the evidence!!!" GarroHorus Jun 2012 #50
the presence of certain posters is evidence Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #53
See post #25 GarroHorus Jun 2012 #54
See the OP. shcrane71 Jun 2012 #59
You still have not answered the question sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #60
Demanding transparency in our elections is not a conspiracy theory EFerrari Jun 2012 #61
Apples and oranges, but it is being framed as a "fruit" issue Spike89 Jun 2012 #56
Uh-huh. Welcome back. apocalypsehow Jun 2012 #62
It does seem odd people would dismiss our faulty voting system fascisthunter Jun 2012 #63
Assume all elections are fraudulent unless the government can prove they are legitimate. limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #64
It's the "Conspiracy Theory" catch-all dismissal Doctor_J Jun 2012 #66
What Doctor_J said... +100000000 shcrane71 Jun 2012 #67
No, politicasista Jun 2012 #69
To answer your question in a word, yes........... socialist_n_TN Jun 2012 #73
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is there a group of peopl...»Reply #52