Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Stunning FLOTUS Portrait To Push You Through This Damn Election [View all]sheshe2
(88,845 posts)38. Neema Neema Neema....
You just came back after a long absence according to your profile. I am so honored that you came to my thread to denigrate a young black woman's vision on what Michelle meant to her and young women of color. Her painting speaks of her passion. The bold vibrancy of her colors and brush strokes are profound and marked with beauty and an inner strength that will not be denied. Michelle has inspired them. Yet you call it paint by numbers. How trite and demeaning.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In case you missed it, I agreed with others. You'e the one who posted it for open comments.
sinkingfeeling
Oct 2016
#28
Sorry, l love the FLOTUS and think she is absolutely beautiful. Don't like the painting.
sinkingfeeling
Oct 2016
#30
An artistic choice? A way of showing how all people have many currents in them?
guillaumeb
Oct 2016
#27
Not at all. I love that she felt so moved by the photograph that she decided to copy it to canvas.
Neema
Oct 2016
#42
what are the specific copyright problems of this first year art student's work?
LanternWaste
Oct 2016
#17
What are the "copyright issues"? You waited years to post this one negative post? C'mon.
George II
Oct 2016
#46