Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Please rec if you are ready to move on from the wikileaks story [View all]BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)39. And you know this how? Gut feeling? Dislike of Hillary because of 25 yrs of Republican
gossip that made her "untrustworthy" in the eyes of some Americans? What is your source?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
186 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
K&R! Let's not forget that the DNC and DWS preferred Hillary in 2008 - and Obama won. Why?
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#3
That's EXACTLY right! It is about the voters. People are still looking for a scapegoat
AgadorSparticus
Jul 2016
#7
Naw. With all the FREE publicity Sanders got, the debate schedule lost its importance. I know it's
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#34
"Let's not forget that the DNC and DWS preferred Hillary in 2008 - and Obama won"
Snotcicles
Jul 2016
#31
It doesn't matter who was at the head of the DNC. Fact remains, the DNC overwhelmingly preferred
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#37
I kind of funny about people who attempt to skirt Rules on this site in order to
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#45
The threat of getting banned for here carries no weight with me whatsoever. nt
Snotcicles
Jul 2016
#54
LOL." kind of funny about people who attempt to skirt Rules on this site in order to continue to
Snotcicles
Jul 2016
#60
Whatever you want to call it, it was NO threat. But I'm certain you know that. Btw? It was a
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#64
Oh give it a rest already with the conspiracy theorizing. Unless and until you've got proof
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#148
wait what? Have you read any of the emails that show impartiality was compromised?
uhnope
Jul 2016
#149
Wait, what? Do you have proof that anything mentioned in e-mails between two staffers ever came to
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#151
you're totally wrong. The emails show the DNC discussing how to sabotage Sander's campaign.
uhnope
Jul 2016
#153
Now you're really grasping. Sabotage?? Bwaaaaahahahahahaha! Words in electronic letters between a
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#159
And you thought wrong (no surprise there!). To make matters worse, you accuse ME
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#166
I've confronted many Putin shills & CTers on DU & you act & argue just like them. n/t
uhnope
Jul 2016
#171
I never said he wasn't. And I don't recall that the DNC showed any preference then
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#55
"So I'm in the camp of "let's move on." " I'm right there with you - and agree with your arguments
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#63
You are absolutely right, we can continue and support our candidates but some
Jim Beard
Jul 2016
#22
And you know this how? Gut feeling? Dislike of Hillary because of 25 yrs of Republican
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#39
Does that include Sanders? Need I list the many infractions and illegalities of his campaign?
KittyWampus
Jul 2016
#27
+1 - I would have preferred to downvote the "Please rec if you are ready to move on"
erronis
Jul 2016
#66
I want the Democratic Party to rid itself of the horrible, NON-Democratic people who caused this.
Cooley Hurd
Jul 2016
#6
I feel the same way. I started voting straight Democratic earlier but I didn't have the opportunity
Jim Beard
Jul 2016
#28
Didn't you just write that Hillary should fuck herself and you will never vote for her?
Squinch
Jul 2016
#99
So you didn't mean it when you said you WERE voting for her, and now you are saying you didn't
Squinch
Jul 2016
#108
And before you said you WERE voting for her, didn't you also say then that you weren't voting
Squinch
Jul 2016
#110
Sorry, mostly disagree. It was more civil and issue-based compared to the GOP side,
R B Garr
Jul 2016
#92
Oh I wouldn't argue that there was plenty of unnecessary divisiveness, I just think that it was
WIProgressive88
Jul 2016
#100
if one reads the emails minus the Assange spin, there's no evidence of "conspiracy"
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#84
not all of us are reading the Wikileaks Tweets and so they don't affect our conclusion that
uhnope
Jul 2016
#154
nope, they don't.. bout the tenth post I've read asking for proof where none is given
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#132
Yes the problems are serious and I think there are more where these came from.
avaistheone1
Jul 2016
#52
Sorry this is too important to ignore. It is about who Democrats are and how we do business.
avaistheone1
Jul 2016
#57
We can't afford to be distracted by quarrels and resentments; the consequences are too grim.
CBHagman
Jul 2016
#36
I'm not moving on until you stop calling it "the wikileaks" story as per the New Democrats orders.
bobthedrummer
Jul 2016
#69
A few snarky comments like we've all made in our professional and personal lives when
Fla Dem
Jul 2016
#88
You mean the wikileaks that Putin commissioned to help Trump? Those wikileaks?
Squinch
Jul 2016
#102
If you let it get talked out now it will disappear shortly. If you try to suppress it,
Yo_Mama
Jul 2016
#105
Nope. This needs to be properly investigated and ALL of the ratfuckers....
PoutrageFatigue
Jul 2016
#112
Or bullshit anecdotal statements taken as fact and 2143 ops based off of it. good try though
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#133
Fact not in dispute: There was no show of operational bias shown by the DNC before the lock up of
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#182
You're attempting to answer a different question than the one I asked.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2016
#183
Got it...we answer the questions we want to answer, not the ones actually being asked.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2016
#186
Move on if you'd like. That's not what the rest of the world is doing.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2016
#121
You're wrong about that, bubble boy. Step outside the bubble and take a look. You'll be shocked.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2016
#155
Just the MSM does as they are reporting on it - on all 3 stations 1st thing this AM. nt
jmg257
Jul 2016
#165
As our authoritarian wing so often says, DU is not representative of the country.
Marr
Jul 2016
#124
Needs to be federally investigated as an act of foreign sabotage of a US presidential election....
Hekate
Jul 2016
#128
When I came to DU 12 years ago, I didn't do it because it was a place where I could stick my head in
Hissyspit
Jul 2016
#138
Ethics and integrity don't matter as long as you repeat the mantra "I'm With Her".
Matt_in_STL
Jul 2016
#152
UNrec. This scandal goes to the heart of what's wrong with American democracy n/t
uhnope
Jul 2016
#142
I missed the part where politics is supposed to be "fair", but that's me...
Blue_Tires
Jul 2016
#174