General Discussion

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)

27. It's a pretty big factor

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 10:54 AM

Jun 2012

and just to be clear: he admitted, to the judge, in those exact words (I have a drinking problem) when the discussion on whether or not to require he have a breathalyzer installed on his vehicle came up. Not afterwards. Not once he was caught. Not to someone else, but specifically to the judge prior to the judge making a decision?

Because I find that difficult to believe.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Woman set on fire was denied restraining order against ex-lover [View all] Baitball Blogger Jun 2012 OP

That judge should be censured at the least. hobbit709 Jun 2012 #1

Lack of evidence? Baitball Blogger Jun 2012 #3

It's like when a friend of mine got divorced a few years back. hobbit709 Jun 2012 #4

But judges/the law can't really operate on a person's word alone 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #20

When her husband admitted to a drinking problem. hobbit709 Jun 2012 #21

He admitted, in court and to the judge 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #22

that's what I said. hobbit709 Jun 2012 #23

That is not what you said 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #24

Maybe I should have put that info in post #4 instead of adding it in post #21 hobbit709 Jun 2012 #25

It's a pretty big factor 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #27

You haven't been around some of the legal profession as I have. hobbit709 Jun 2012 #28

Why? jberryhill Jun 2012 #11

I'll have to go back to the link since I only skimmed it, but PotatoChip Jun 2012 #35

Why do all things odd in the Orlando area happen Fawke Em Jun 2012 #36

Because of what? AngryAmish Jun 2012 #18

This sounds and looks eerily like an "Honor" Killing. Why didn't the clerk call 911 as soon as she lookingfortruth Jun 2012 #2

I know this situation very well.. Meg_Griffin_1 Jun 2012 #6

I instruct all my clients after getting a Protective Order to get a weapon (firearm usually). nt kelly1mm Jun 2012 #37

Why did she leave the store malaise Jun 2012 #16

He dragged her from the store in the article I saw obamanut2012 Jun 2012 #31

How horrible. What a monster. The judge should be removed. nt Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #5

For what? Following the law? WolverineDG Jun 2012 #12

I guess you didn't read the article. There WAS evidence. It's opinion as to Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #40

Judge probably working within the parameters of the law justiceischeap Jun 2012 #7

Yes to both points obamanut2012 Jun 2012 #8

Then they need the law changed. n/t whathehell Jun 2012 #10

3 AM outside of a 7-11? jberryhill Jun 2012 #9

You get a call in the middle of the night Sedona Jun 2012 #13

Yep, show up with a cop 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #19

to exchange custody of a 4 year old? WolverineDG Jun 2012 #14

The story implies that he was turning ove the child jberryhill Jun 2012 #15

It's probably significant that the child was found asleep at *his* residence Mairead Jun 2012 #17

yep laundry_queen Jun 2012 #29

It's not "blame the victim" jberryhill Jun 2012 #32

It's not "blame the victim" for commenting on someone WolverineDG Jun 2012 #34

No, she's supposed to be picking him up. PotatoChip Jun 2012 #39

I was denied a restraining order. revolution breeze Jun 2012 #26

ugh laundry_queen Jun 2012 #30

The GOOD news is she now has sufficient evidence to get that restraining order slackmaster Jun 2012 #33

horrible. Glad she will recover. Liberal_in_LA Jun 2012 #38