Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If the Union Members are going to not support themselves then why should I continue to support them? [View all]RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)76. Bingo. Millions are voting against their best interests. And that includes union members.
Propaganda works best when you don't realize it's propaganda.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
158 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If the Union Members are going to not support themselves then why should I continue to support them? [View all]
dinopipie
Jun 2012
OP
You are just being rude. I saw that reported on the news also, just as the OP said.
Autumn
Jun 2012
#101
The only thing it says is that the OP asked a question on what they heard reported.
Autumn
Jun 2012
#106
It's not false information. The OP created a post asking a question based on what was reported
Autumn
Jun 2012
#111
The source of the confusion may be this: Union Members at 27%..Union households at 35%..n/t
whathehell
Jun 2012
#18
Your original post hits the nail right on the head. All these folks obsessing about the exact # or
pangaia
Jun 2012
#82
Bradblog.com has been recording proprietary voting machine anomalies for years now.
valerief
Jun 2012
#58
In this day and age, I have a guy I grew up with who is now in Ohio working for GM, praising repigs
LaydeeBug
Jun 2012
#13
Are you really sure that you want to accept that 35% of Union members voted for Walker?
HereSince1628
Jun 2012
#12
FWIW, your smug attitude and sense of entitlement is really creepy - n/t
coalition_unwilling
Jun 2012
#144
I thought his post was wholly dependent on WI and not the ENTIRE labor force. n/t
vaberella
Jun 2012
#53
I can't believe that exit poll. It's like believing the exit poll where the race is too close to
shcrane71
Jun 2012
#26
Hard to tell what to believe isn't it. Seems something could be done to instill
shcrane71
Jun 2012
#68
Assuming you mean the Walker recall, Scotty exempted some Unions from attack...
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2012
#38
And yet you apparently could not google up information on exempt Unions in Wisconsin
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2012
#52
The fact that individuals are afraid of their bosses is why collective action is needed
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2012
#99
Whether a member of a Union or not most workers receive residual benefit by the
Snotcicles
Jun 2012
#61
Because of labor the recall happened, however, I do know this, because of labor Reagan won, and
still_one
Jun 2012
#71
Bingo. Millions are voting against their best interests. And that includes union members.
RufusTFirefly
Jun 2012
#76
Not every union member supports unions, and even supporters may have other priorities
thesquanderer
Jun 2012
#90
So you are only going to support causes and rights that get 100% of their internal vote?
TheKentuckian
Jun 2012
#94
Okay, so 25% defection is our line for support? Is 27% of union members (rather than 35% of
TheKentuckian
Jun 2012
#109
Union Members do support themselves. And you should support unions b/c it's the right thing to do.
fishwax
Jun 2012
#98
You have every right to express frustration at union workers that vote for Walker.
pennylane100
Jun 2012
#110