Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
70. There won't be federal requirement for UBCs...
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 01:42 AM
Jun 2016

Ever....or at least until there is a constitutional amendment...

Guns: A proposed compromise [View all] Just reading posts Jun 2016 OP
They have plenty. Give them nothing. No more Weapons Of War. Period. nt onehandle Jun 2016 #1
lol nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #3
When you find an AR-15 in anyone's military Press Virginia Jun 2016 #6
No weapons of war? So a single shot Springfield 1873 rifle is verboten? Just reading posts Jun 2016 #8
We had 10 years of automatic weapons banned and columbine happened yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #50
It was not an automatic weapon ban Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #55
One side gets 3 things safeinOhio Jun 2016 #2
I only count only two, arguably one. Silencers and SBRS, both of which arguably fall under the same Just reading posts Jun 2016 #7
So, you call safeinOhio Jun 2016 #9
Sure I compromised. I propose giving your side Universal Backgound Checks in return for NFA reform. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #13
Even at what you're offering and asking... Chan790 Jun 2016 #62
I'm good with that, actually. sir pball Jun 2016 #76
I would completely support that SuperDutyTX Jun 2016 #4
There won't be federal requirement for UBCs... pipoman Jun 2016 #70
Don't forget a National CCW license Press Virginia Jun 2016 #5
The standards would have to be much higher for me to agree with it. roamer65 Jun 2016 #20
Deal-breaker. Chan790 Jun 2016 #63
Really? Straw Man Jun 2016 #64
Currently CT...which is may issue. (Though they refuse recognition of any other state.) Chan790 Jun 2016 #66
Well ... Straw Man Jun 2016 #67
No, you harass state lawmakers until they give you what you want... Chan790 Jun 2016 #68
They are not the issuing authority. Straw Man Jun 2016 #71
No, they make the laws setting the guidelines DSP follows. Chan790 Jun 2016 #73
It's not a matter of law. Straw Man Jun 2016 #75
Universal Background Checks Kang Colby Jun 2016 #10
I bow to your better thought out proposal. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #17
My full proposal for UBCs is as follows: Kang Colby Jun 2016 #19
I leave my response to these good people: Just reading posts Jun 2016 #32
Too generous of you. Kang Colby Jun 2016 #52
In return for all of those Crepuscular Jun 2016 #21
Scrap NFA Kang Colby Jun 2016 #24
We have a winner! Just reading posts Jun 2016 #30
Check this out. Kang Colby Jun 2016 #40
So they more easily get away with murder with silencers? scscholar Jun 2016 #11
hah! SuperDutyTX Jun 2016 #14
Hahahahahahahahahaha! Press Virginia Jun 2016 #15
you do know it is not the movies Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #16
So in theory if we put one in Trump's mouth..... JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #29
That is disgusting, never joke about muzzles in peoples mouths Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #49
Can one be screwed on his lips. JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #58
That I can agree with Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #59
.. JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #77
"Months of paperwork" maxsolomon Jun 2016 #12
Shotguns, rifles and revolvers. roamer65 Jun 2016 #18
So the rules regarding rifles and shotguns remain the same, but semiauto handguns are outlawed? Just reading posts Jun 2016 #23
Simple 6 shot revolvers. roamer65 Jun 2016 #25
But we could still have semiauto "assault weapons"? You did say rifles and shotguns were allowed. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #28
Classic hunting rifles. roamer65 Jun 2016 #31
Sounds like you want us to go to (roughly) Australia's level of gun control. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #35
No Canada. roamer65 Jun 2016 #38
But in Canada you're allowed to own semiautomatic handguns, as well as some "evil black rifles". Just reading posts Jun 2016 #46
I would be negotiable if the backgrounding process for those classes were even more rigorous. roamer65 Jun 2016 #51
Hmm...Would you trade UBC with registration for National CCW? jmg257 Jun 2016 #22
I think I'd be giving away more than I got. CCW is becoming the norm already. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #26
Nationwide reciprication I mean? jmg257 Jun 2016 #27
Hm....not enough. Want more. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #33
Registration of handguns only? nt jmg257 Jun 2016 #41
CA, NY, NJ and MA will not go along. roamer65 Jun 2016 #34
I don't expect the West Coast or Northeast to respect gun rights any time in the foreseeable future. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #36
CCW isn't a right. It's a privilege. Just like a driver's license. roamer65 Jun 2016 #45
Yeah - federal steps into what has been state territory. nt jmg257 Jun 2016 #44
NY has a lot of gall ... Straw Man Jun 2016 #65
Get out a dictionary and look up the word "Massacre." So, no. Squinch Jun 2016 #37
This is what a real compromise would look like, as opposed to someone saying that their "compromise" Just reading posts Jun 2016 #42
The NRA has stolen your humanity. And you let them. Squinch Jun 2016 #47
Overdramatize much? Just reading posts Jun 2016 #48
Thank you for proving my point. Laugh away. Squinch Jun 2016 #79
Another graduate of the Ron White School of Rhetoric. Straw Man Jun 2016 #72
I thought I had all the ammosexuals on my Forever Ignored club. I missed you! nt valerief Jun 2016 #39
And you kicked the thread just to tell me that? That's so sweet..... Just reading posts Jun 2016 #43
Brand new account, but he sounds like a long time DUer SwankyXomb Jun 2016 #53
Exactly. Some Gungeoneers are on account 10, or so. Hoyt Jun 2016 #54
Proof? Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #56
He has none. Straw Man Jun 2016 #74
I know, that's why I asked Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #78
It actually took me a while to figure out you were joking. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #57
If memorie serves Daninmo Jun 2016 #60
No, RKBA activists getting too much and giving up too little. Chan790 Jun 2016 #61
See....this is real simple.... pipoman Jun 2016 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Guns: A proposed comprom...»Reply #70