HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » For once, let's all ignor... » Reply #31

Response to Squinch (Reply #30)

Sun Jun 12, 2016, 03:03 PM

31. Right; Constitutionally we could only restrict their transfer

(That's not even the 2nd Amendment; it's the 5th since it would be considered a "taking".)

If it required a Federal license to buy a new or used semi-automatic, fewer people would buy them, and so fewer would get made.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 35 replies Author Time Post
Squinch Jun 2016 OP
uponit7771 Jun 2016 #1
Squinch Jun 2016 #9
Quackers Jun 2016 #2
Squinch Jun 2016 #6
NickB79 Jun 2016 #33
Quackers Jun 2016 #34
NickB79 Jun 2016 #35
Squinch Jun 2016 #3
HassleCat Jun 2016 #4
Squinch Jun 2016 #7
HassleCat Jun 2016 #15
LiberalEsto Jun 2016 #5
Squinch Jun 2016 #8
uponit7771 Jun 2016 #10
brer cat Jun 2016 #24
Quackers Jun 2016 #11
Squinch Jun 2016 #13
beevul Jun 2016 #18
Quackers Jun 2016 #20
beevul Jun 2016 #23
Quackers Jun 2016 #25
Squinch Jun 2016 #22
One_Life_To_Give Jun 2016 #12
Squinch Jun 2016 #14
Squinch Jun 2016 #16
etherealtruth Jun 2016 #17
mopinko Jun 2016 #19
Squinch Jun 2016 #21
brer cat Jun 2016 #26
Squinch Jun 2016 #28
Brickbat Jun 2016 #27
Recursion Jun 2016 #29
Squinch Jun 2016 #30
LineLineLineNew Reply Right; Constitutionally we could only restrict their transfer
Recursion Jun 2016 #31
Squinch Jun 2016 #32
Please login to view edit histories.