Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court may be filled due to Trump nomination [View all]basselope
(2,565 posts)26. No, they don't.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump sucks, but how many pundits and statisticians and candidates have underestimated him? I see no
Attorney in Texas
May 2016
#36
The money has disagreed for the last 18 months. I'd say a consistent, longstanding pattern exists.
LonePirate
May 2016
#28
When you're losing an argument this badly, asinine retorts doom your whole narrative. nt
procon
May 2016
#49
does it take much practise to be that snarky. Dem to Dem, you should be a little nicer.
trueblue2007
May 2016
#67
I think you're overestimating Trumps "appeal" or HRC's lack of appeal. nt
justiceischeap
May 2016
#65
True. They are such rigid idealogues that it would be impossible for them to change course.
procon
May 2016
#12
Or it could be that they know a Trump nominee could be considerably to the left of
Marr
May 2016
#32
Sorry, but this is silly. The Feceralist Society picks Republican Supreme Court nominees.
Trust Buster
May 2016
#55