Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Every election we lose is not because of fraud! [View all]apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)53. No, he is not: you simply do not have the proof to offer that has been requested of you repeatedly.
So what we get instead is post like yours here, that spins absurd, fictional scenarios and pretends it's "proven" something.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Chain of custody broken in Ohio in 2004, in San Diego in 2006, in New Hampshire in 2008,
EFerrari
Jun 2012
#98
No, he is not: you simply do not have the proof to offer that has been requested of you repeatedly.
apocalypsehow
Jun 2012
#53
Wait, you and others on this thread are accepting a result reflexively because it was presented
EFerrari
Jun 2012
#82
This is not a criminal case, there is no innocent until proven guilty in transparency matters
Bjorn Against
Jun 2012
#54
That is utter tripe. The default position of any scientist or computer programmer
eridani
Jun 2012
#126
There are right-wingers who think the results of the 2008 election were not valid.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Jun 2012
#102
I know you think this is a clever tactic, but, in fact, the burden of proof is on YOU and others
apocalypsehow
Jun 2012
#52
I am not asserting anything, those who say it is legitimate are making assertions
Bjorn Against
Jun 2012
#71
Provide evidence of fraud, or go away and cease embarrasing DU. It is that simple. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Jun 2012
#77
Provide evidence of fraud, or go away and cease embarrasing DU. It is that simple. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Jun 2012
#88
Provide evidence of fraud, or go away and cease embarrasing DU. It is that simple. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Jun 2012
#147
Bad intent isn't even necessary for bad results. The software could simply be crap
gkhouston
Jun 2012
#131
The problem with the idea that poll watchers or the DoJ watched this election closely
EFerrari
Jun 2012
#97
Horseshit. If I give you a lab report asserting that there are x parts per million
eridani
Jun 2012
#129
The conspiracy theory is that you can know the results of an election counted in secret.
EFerrari
Jun 2012
#22
One election we lose due to fraud DOES = every election is suspcious I'm not going to forget Bush 01
uponit7771
Jun 2012
#4
There is a problem with the "Had the recount continued to completion" thing.
GarroHorus
Jun 2012
#26
We know Repukes will cheat. I think they cheat whether they need to or not. As far as I am concerned
rhett o rick
Jun 2012
#32
Pardon me, but don't we need to be concerned about BOTH? What about Florida?
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jun 2012
#35
Voter caging in Florida altered the national political landscape and impacted the world
L. Coyote
Jun 2012
#70
In the absence of transparent elections, we have no way to assess the truth of your assertion. n/t
gkhouston
Jun 2012
#43
I haven't read one case on DU of someone saying every election we lose is because of fraud.
Prometheus Bound
Jun 2012
#50
There was all kind of discussion of NY when they were trying to get rid of the lever machines.
EFerrari
Jun 2012
#116
I can state that there has been fraud in every election since 2000. That I know.
robinlynne
Jun 2012
#76
Of course not but since elections are not transparent and worse the opposition owns
TheKentuckian
Jun 2012
#66
I am sure that many of the people claiming this is fraud because . . . well it just is
4th law of robotics
Jun 2012
#106