Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New Leak at Hanford Nuclear Waste Site is 'Catastrophic,' Worker Warns [View all]hunter
(38,303 posts)38. In the former Soviet Union they were in such a hurry to build bombs...
... they sometimes didn't put the stuff in tanks. Yep, they simply dug a hole and poured it in.
China has similar sites. Of course, they've got places even worse, contaminated with toxins that have a "half life" of FOREVER.
We reached the shore, and looked across the lake. Id seen some photos before I left for Inner Mongolia, but nothing prepared me for the sight. Its a truly alien environment, dystopian and horrifying. The thought that it is man-made depressed and terrified me, as did the realisation that this was the byproduct not just of the consumer electronics in my pocket, but also green technologies like wind turbines and electric cars that we get so smugly excited about in the West. Unsure of quite how to react, I take photos and shoot video on my cerium polished iPhone.
You can see the lake on Google Maps, and that hints at the scale. Zoom in far enough and you can make out the dozens of pipes that line the shore. Unknown Fields Liam Young collected some samples of the waste and took it back to the UK to be tested. The clay we collected from the toxic lake tested at around three times background radiation, he later tells me.
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20150402-the-worst-place-on-earth
Three times background radiation really isn't the worst of it. It's the stuff that doesn't reveal itself to the radiation counter that will kill you.
The horrors of our high energy industrial society are all around us. There may be one parked in your driveway. Ordinary gasoline and used motor oil are carcinogens. So are the microscopic particles that lodge in your lungs, spewed out of your car's exhaust pipe or shed by your car's brakes and tires.
I don't know anyone who has been killed by radioactive waste, but I've known many people killed by automobiles, and I've known many natural landscapes destroyed by highways, roads, parking lots, and other automobile enabled "economic development."
Hanford is an expensive mess to clean up, but it's nowhere near the worst place in the world, which is, I think, commuting in stop-and-go traffic on California's 405 freeway or driving anywhere in Mexico City at any time for any reason. But that's just my personal experience. I'm certain there are worse automobile hells, just as there are worse radioactive hells than Hanford.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ok - 8 inches sounds bad, but not if it's in a 50 gallon drum. A better estimate of the actual
jonno99
Apr 2016
#2
Nuclear energy never was "cheap" for taxpayers, only profitable for nuke builders.. ~eom
vkkv
Apr 2016
#5
I mean, it's perfectly safe, bananas are more dangerous, why do you hate science?!
MisterP
Apr 2016
#7
And genetically modified atoms are just as safe as geneticially modified tomatoes. Besides, Jesus.
valerief
Apr 2016
#17
The Outer Tank Constructed By Same Contractor Who Built New Orleans Levees - Relax
Yallow
Apr 2016
#32
Before that can happen in any serious way we need to stop the states and power companies that have
Dustlawyer
Apr 2016
#39
One of the reasons I support Bernie is that he is not so enmeshed in the political machinations
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#40
I don't know why everyone in this thread seems determined to call this 'nuclear power' as if it was
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2016
#12
Usually when someone starts a sentence with 'so' a massive, ridiculous strawman follows.
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2016
#31
They are moved to a cooling pool until the decay heat is within spec for the cask.
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2016
#53
A lot of shit is, however. Fukishima!! This article's consequences, apply to the nuclear
FighttheFuture
Apr 2016
#20
Some percentage overlaps, but Fukushima Dai-ichi has no relevance to this issue.
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2016
#22
Oh PLEASE! Nuclear Waste being released into our environment is extremely relevant,
bvar22
Apr 2016
#29
"The failure of the inner shell demonstrates how UNSAFE our system of containment is"
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2016
#46
Thank you, JEB! You're doing what the Mainstream Media Monopoly doesn't do: Report the Truth.
Octafish
Apr 2016
#27
Call Japan. They have lots of experience in trying to cover nuclear leaks up while people die. n/t
jtuck004
Apr 2016
#28
MEANWHILE....THE MEDIA AND NATION ARGUE/OBSESS OVER BERNIE SANDERS AND THE POPE!
cynzke
Apr 2016
#42