Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
14. Read more world history.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:29 PM
Jan 2016

This isn't cynicism, this is realism. The desire for power and self-advancement is universal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partitioning_of_the_Ottoman_Empire

Read the history of European powers in the Middle East after the Ottoman empire dies in World War I.

The League of Nations granted French Mandate for Syria and the Lebanon and British Mandate for Mesopotamia (later Iraq) and British Mandate for Palestine, later divided into Mandatory Palestine and Emirate of Transjordan (1921-1946). The Ottoman Empire's possessions in the Arabian Peninsula became the Kingdom of Hejaz, which was annexed by the Sultanate of Nejd (today Saudi Arabia), and the Mutawakkilite Kingdom of Yemen. The Empire's possessions on the western shores of the Persian Gulf were variously annexed by Saudi Arabia (Alahsa and Qatif), or remained British protectorates (Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar) and became the Arab States of the Persian Gulf.




In other words, Britain and France turned much of the region into colonies, and into separate countries where they had not existed before. Iraq was one such invention.

Here is the history of the discovering oil in Saudi Arabia. See how many world powers are involved;
In 1922 King Abdulaziz met a New Zealand mining engineer named Major Frank Holmes. During World War I, Holmes had been to Gallipoli and then Ethiopia, where he first heard rumours of the oil seeps of the Persian Gulf region.[1] He was convinced that much oil would be found throughout the region. After the war, Holmes helped to set up Eastern and General Syndicate Ltd in order, among other things, to seek oil concessions in the region.

In 1923, the king signed a concession with Holmes allowing him to search for oil in eastern Saudi Arabia. Eastern and General Syndicate brought in a Swiss geologist to evaluate the land but he claimed that searching for oil in Arabia would be “a pure gamble”.[1] This discouraged the major banks and oil companies from investing in Arabian oil ventures.

In 1925, Holmes signed a concession with the sheikh of Bahrain, allowing him to search for oil there. He then proceeded to the United States to find an oil company that might be interested in taking on the concession. He found help from Gulf Oil. In 1927, Gulf Oil took control of the concessions that Holmes made years ago. But Gulf Oil was a partner in the Iraq Petroleum Company, which was jointly owned by Royal Dutch/Shell, Anglo-Persian, the Compagnie Française des Pétroles, and "the Near East Development Company, representing the interests of the American companies.[3] The partners had signed up to the “Red Line Agreement” which meant that Gulf Oil was precluded from taking up the Bahrain concession without the consent of the other partners; and they declined.[1] Despite a promising survey in Bahrain, Gulf Oil was forced to transfer its interest to another company, Standard Oil of California(SOCAL), which was not a bound by the Red Line Agreement.[4]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_oil_industry_in_Saudi_Arabia

The sooner EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #1
Yes . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #3
And they haven't for years. EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #5
Dark Ages bullshit that threatens us all. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #2
Theirs is a benightedly Medieval social and political system . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #6
It is really an argument over power and influence, not religion. kwassa Jan 2016 #4
Saudi Arabia in its current form would have disappeared long ago . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #7
No. Anybody that sits on that much oil would be powerful. kwassa Jan 2016 #8
I am not cynical enough about the human race to believe that . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #13
Read more world history. kwassa Jan 2016 #14
I have taught World History . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #16
well, I don't think you are correct ... kwassa Jan 2016 #20
That is your opinion . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #21
In any potential war, always ask who stands to profit Gman Jan 2016 #9
The Trojan war was not, I'm certain, really about taking back "Menelaus's Helen" . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #12
Back In Undergrad. . . ProfessorGAC Jan 2016 #17
The Trojan war is deeply shrouded in the mists of the distant past . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #18
I'm pretty sure the war against Ilium predated Greek colonization of the Black Sea Bucky Jan 2016 #22
There were no Mycenaean Greek colonies on the Black Sea coast, you are correct. another_liberal Jan 2016 #24
Yeah, That Makes Sense ProfessorGAC Jan 2016 #23
Yes, I think your professor was sharing an important insight . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #25
I Agree ProfessorGAC Jan 2016 #26
Invisible, omnipotent, immortal, and EXTREMELY SENSITIVE TO ANY PERSONAL INSULTS Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #10
Apt warning . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #11
religious nuttery Skittles Jan 2016 #15
Two blind roommates trying to have a fight with broken bottles . . . hatrack Jan 2016 #19
it is all so fucking ridiculous Skittles Jan 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»All for the sake of winni...»Reply #14