Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Wyden (D-Ore) revolts over secrecy regarding latest free-trade negotiations [View all]AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)22. Actually, his words at the end of his statement speak for themselves:
My intent is to do everything I can to see that this legislation is advanced quickly and becomes law, so that elected Members of Congress can do what the Constitution requires and what their constituents expect.
I yield the floor.
I yield the floor.
http://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/blog/post/iycmi-wyden-statement-introducing-congressional-oversight-over-trade-negotiations-act
The words "so that elected Members of Congress can do what the Constitution requires and what their constituents expect" are exactly the right words that a responsible Senator should say when representing his constituants and when finding it necessary to introduce legislation so that he and others can have access to the information that the "A team" lobbyists already have.
If you are interpreting his words "My intent is to do everything I can to see that this legislation is advanced quickly and becomes law," without his qualifying words that follow in the same sentence, as meaning that he is doing the opposite of making a pro-labor stand and that he is unconditionally supporting the pending free-trade agreement regardless of what it provides, then you are obviously interpreting the phrase out of context. And you are reading it too narrowly.
You would have more support for an interpretation that he is anti-labor if he had a history of being anti-labor. He doesn't. That is one reason why many of his pro-labor constituents vote for him.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wyden (D-Ore) revolts over secrecy regarding latest free-trade negotiations [View all]
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2012
OP
He's really pissed me off recently by giving cover to the Republicans on Medicare
Arugula Latte
May 2012
#5
Are you trying to hijack this thread by changing the subject and using an ad hominem attack?
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2012
#10
The topic is the secrecy over the free-trade negotiations, not which of us has the greatest
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2012
#24
Our "transparent" executive branch is afraid the congress might leak it to (GASP!) the people.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2012
#9
So, is "transparency in government" to be replaced by "Opacity in government" as a campaign slogan?
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2012
#8
nope it's been changed to "you'll see what I choose to show you now stfu and stfd"
leftyohiolib
May 2012
#11
Hm. I've been wondering about the Chinese dissident and the Secret Service parties that...
Peace Patriot
May 2012
#14
Tell that to the German and the Swedes. They have stronger union and more free trade
pampango
May 2012
#20
important - "NAFTA on steroids" does not even *begin* to describe this monstrosity
inna
May 2012
#29
"Cheapest-labor agreements" is the more accurate buzz phrase. I'm going to borrow it.
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2012
#32