Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We need to propose bold ideas like reducing SocSec to age 50. [View all]NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)11. I think that negotiations from the administration have been lackluster.
I think on many issues they have set their starting point where the would like to be at the end. They must start the negotiation at a more preferable position than where they want to end up.
Instead of discussing the need for changes to SS, do as you have said. Start the conversation with the benefits of lowering it.
Instead of starting the negotiations with support for a public option, begin by educating the populace on the benefits of single payer.
Instead of supporting tax cuts in a stimulus package, tell the people why straight spending will benefit them much sooner.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Agreed. That's the best way to compromise. Aim high, settle for what you really wanted. nt
Comrade_McKenzie
May 2012
#1
Yep, but I doubt if that would be a realistic opening bid. Do you really think so?
CTyankee
May 2012
#13
Europe isn't all bad, just some of the southermost countriesl Certainly not the north.
CTyankee
May 2012
#16
Yes, and the Dems silenced that idea for the second time under Obama :( n/t
slipslidingaway
May 2012
#24
AFL-CIO has proposed something similar, removing the cap and increasing the payments. We have to
freshwest
May 2012
#6
It is not clear if you agree with the OP or not. Do you support SS or not?
rhett o rick
May 2012
#12
SS lifted the MAJORITY of seniors out of poverty. The problem is that it used to tax 85% of all wage
Vincardog
May 2012
#55
Get a strong Democratic majority in Congress and the President will be FDR's clone!
xtraxritical
May 2012
#30
With a 100 Dem Senators and 435 Dems in congress, we still wouldn't see FDR's clone.
hughee99
May 2012
#43
Time to resurrect Sen. George McGovern's idea for a Guranteed Annual Income for
coalition_unwilling
May 2012
#26
Sorry, peak earning years are the 50s. I fully intend to take advantage of that fact
Godhumor
May 2012
#28
There is no requirement that you start receiving SS at any age, although
coalition_unwilling
May 2012
#32
Absolutely agree. The way I see it, the fifties are when you prepare for your golden years
Godhumor
May 2012
#48
There would be such a huge reduction in social security you would have to be wealthy anyway.
dkf
May 2012
#31
First you are counting on the lack of age discrimination. If you have a job at 50
CK_John
May 2012
#54
So you're a consumer, not a producer or a leaver of the the world in a better place.
NYC_SKP
May 2012
#42