Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: University Scientists Caught Conspiring with Monsanto to Manipulate Public Opinion on GMOs [View all]PatSeg
(49,562 posts)70. Watch This Researcher
Destroy Neil deGrasse Tysons GMO Argument in Less Than Two Minutes.
Jeffrey Smith Responds to Tysons Rant
In response to Tysons rant, Jeffrey M. Smith, a researcher, author and filmmaker who produced Genetic Roulette, has come out with the following video.
Smith acknowledges that Tyson is a great scientist in his field, and points out evidence from former FDA compliance officer Dr. Linda Khal that sheds an awful lot of truth the flawed basis of Tysons argument:
http://althealthworks.com/3455/watch-this-researcher-destroy-neil-degrasse-tysons-gmo-argument-in-less-than-two-minutes/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
University Scientists Caught Conspiring with Monsanto to Manipulate Public Opinion on GMOs [View all]
RiverLover
Sep 2015
OP
Not if those same scientists are bring in the big bucks with their research grants
reformist2
Sep 2015
#26
Yes. It's a bit like the way that leagues looked the other way at steroid use.
RufusTFirefly
Sep 2015
#31
"My brother-in-law thinks he's Woody Allen. We'd have him committed, but we need
tblue37
Sep 2015
#44
If the $$s coming into the Unis is significant, they will do everything they can
erronis
Sep 2015
#28
The biggest factor these days in obtaining tenure is how much $$$ they can bring in.
reformist2
Sep 2015
#27
Wow. I would think tenure would allow professors to reject this sort of money grubbing
Ed Suspicious
Sep 2015
#76
The public in general is pliable. And its easier to believe all those rampant chemicals dispersed
RiverLover
Sep 2015
#4
Mother may have made a nice Sunday dinner so it may be awhile before they get back downstairs
Person 2713
Sep 2015
#62
It is disappointing. And The Times story left out the fact that Monsanto has given $1 million
RiverLover
Sep 2015
#9
that's just 'cuz y'all aren't starry-eyed enough: your disbelief will drag us into a new Dark Age!
MisterP
Sep 2015
#11
I've always found it interesting which multi conglomerates we are supposed to have faith in
Rex
Sep 2015
#13
Actually, it was getting educated on the issue, that caused him to support GMOs.
progressoid
Sep 2015
#68
Yeah those ignorant PHD bastids should listen to the great unwashed slanted luddites.
CBGLuthier
Sep 2015
#80
heck, had this been 1994 Tyson would never have told us to doubt corpo-funded science
MisterP
Sep 2015
#54
a lot of them do blame Seth MacFarlane for the fracas more than Tyson, who's not so "ideological"
MisterP
Sep 2015
#63
The BS is Monanto & Bayer making million$ and not caring they're putting US & the environment
RiverLover
Sep 2015
#29
I shouldn't have to tell a college professor to brush up on the meaning of conspiracy.
DisgustipatedinCA
Sep 2015
#38
There is a clear conflict of interest when the researchers are benefiting financially
pnwmom
Sep 2015
#53
I know where ever you are on the internet be prepared to argue with paid sockpuppets
Enthusiast
Sep 2015
#35
It doesn't pass the smell test. Like getting into a fist fight over Coke vs Pepsi, it only makes
GoneFishin
Sep 2015
#51
I'm so glad others can see through this ruse. I encountered it during my earliest days on the net.
Enthusiast
Sep 2015
#78
For some reason they couldn't buy so many academics in Europe, China, etc. but here in NA hands out
Person 2713
Sep 2015
#61
I wrote not so many (not enough to stop the current labeling laws ) although UK is readdressing
Person 2713
Sep 2015
#69