General Discussion

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)

10. To all intents and purposes the war was over.

Reply to Recursion (Reply #9)

Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:09 PM

Aug 2015

What would have happened if we didn't invade Japan and just ignored it? Would it have invaded Malibu?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How many people total would have died in a US invasion of the Japanese islands in 1945-46? [View all] Recursion Aug 2015 OP

Could have been 0 Johnny2X2X Aug 2015 #1

I updated the choices to include less than 5,000 Recursion Aug 2015 #6

Japan was getting mighty scared about Russia getting involved in the war - they MillennialDem Aug 2015 #45

Nah.. They were done after Okinawa, and they knew it. Adrahil Aug 2015 #70

Innocents in countries occupied by Japan would have continued to die in massive numbers hack89 Aug 2015 #21

Many Sherman A1 Aug 2015 #2

The going estimate was 600,000 US casualties, X2 Japanese Recursion Aug 2015 #3

If anything, military plans sarisataka Aug 2015 #12

As a side note on casulties oneshooter Aug 2015 #48

Yes they are. neverforget Aug 2015 #72

Civilians and military? GusBob Aug 2015 #4

Good point, yes: including civilians Recursion Aug 2015 #5

Then in my view way over a million GusBob Aug 2015 #16

Not to mention exposure and starvation during the occupation (nt) Recursion Aug 2015 #26

The minimum estimate for just US deaths was 100,000. HooptieWagon Aug 2015 #7

I agree. The Japanese army would have hifiguy Aug 2015 #25

There was no need to invade Japan. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #8

So the war would have ended... magically? (nt) Recursion Aug 2015 #9

To all intents and purposes the war was over. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #10

The alternate plan to end the war sarisataka Aug 2015 #15

Russia invaded China and rolled over the Japanese army without that happening. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #31

AFTER Hiroshima. hobbit709 Aug 2015 #35

So what? Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #42

And the bombs had been used sarisataka Aug 2015 #73

Millions would died of starvation. MicaelS Aug 2015 #22

Why blockade. What would be the point? Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #32

To force the Japanese to surrender. n/t MicaelS Aug 2015 #33

So, it was for the winning trophy? Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #40

They were not defeated. NutmegYankee Aug 2015 #57

The war had to end to get the POWs released. NutmegYankee Aug 2015 #36

So we killed thousands on the chance that they would release the prisoners? Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #43

Are you trying to imply the Japanese were innocent? Because they weren't. MicaelS Aug 2015 #46

Once Japan surrendered, the POWs were released. NutmegYankee Aug 2015 #47

Millions of innocents in countries occupied by Japan would die. hack89 Aug 2015 #24

Those occupations were over or ending. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #38

What about the tens of thousands of Chinese/Koreans/Filipinos forced into slave labor in Japan? NutmegYankee Aug 2015 #49

Not in the minds of some, apparently. MicaelS Aug 2015 #50

2 Nuclear bombs did not force Japan to surrender GreatGazoo Aug 2015 #17

I pointed out in the options that the Tokyo firebombing killed twice as many as the two nukes Recursion Aug 2015 #19

Likely they expected better terms from the US than from the Soviets GreatGazoo Aug 2015 #20

Bingo! The Japanese feared the Soviets more than us. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #44

you really mean this? wow, just wow n/t irisblue Aug 2015 #53

Speculation. NO possible way to tell. cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #11

read about the planning done for Operation Downfall, total deaths could easily top 1 million Amishman Aug 2015 #13

Numbers I have seen 1939 Aug 2015 #56

When I was growing up matt819 Aug 2015 #14

Given the way they fought for a piece of crap island like Iwo Jima, geek tragedy Aug 2015 #18

Wow concern trolling one OP right after the other huh? Rex Aug 2015 #23

Dick Cheney said edhopper Aug 2015 #27

There is a reasonable chance that I would not be here. TexasTowelie Aug 2015 #28

Uhm japam was willing to surrender before the bombs were deployed people. eom Malraiders Aug 2015 #29

Were they? Recursion Aug 2015 #30

Tojo didn't want to surrender. After Hiroshima and Nagasaki it took continued firebombing of Tokyo. EndElectoral Aug 2015 #39

If they were willing, why didn't they surrender? n/t MicaelS Aug 2015 #34

My father was in the front lines of Okinawa, so had there been invasion I might not be posting this. EndElectoral Aug 2015 #37

No way to know. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #41

US Military estimates of US casualties in the invasion of Japan 1939 Aug 2015 #51

General MacArthur's staff anticipated about 50000 American casualties, and several time that number still_one Aug 2015 #52

None. Some historians say that Japan was ready to surrender Cleita Aug 2015 #54

+1 rug Aug 2015 #55

It's not that simple. NuclearDem Aug 2015 #58

We still didn't have to drop a nuclear bomb on them. eom Cleita Aug 2015 #59

Considering Hirohito himself cited the atomic bombings--and not the USSR--as his main reason NuclearDem Aug 2015 #60

Bombing civilians is a war crime. Rex Aug 2015 #61

No argument from me on that point. NuclearDem Aug 2015 #63

Cited what as his main reason for what? Cleita Aug 2015 #65

Cited the atom bomb as his main reason for surrender. NuclearDem Aug 2015 #67

So he had a face saving excuse. He was ready to surrender before we dropped the bomb. Cleita Aug 2015 #68

A LOT of revisionist history going on here hueymahl Aug 2015 #62

The War of 1812 say Rex Aug 2015 #64

Not that many. former9thward Aug 2015 #66

It's interesting how the wartime propaganda still lives on. hunter Aug 2015 #69

I remember watching those bomb tests on TV. Cleita Aug 2015 #71

We are very fortunate Hirohito was a man of some sense. roamer65 Aug 2015 #74