Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)LA Times fires Ted Rall for criticizing LAPD after saying he lied about them; turns out LAPD lied [View all]
Ted Rall-LAPD Scandal: Rall Vindicated; LAPD, LA Times Under Fire<snip>
In the column Rall recounted his own 2001 arrest for jaywalking on LAs Melrose Avenue. Rall wrote that the arresting officer shoved him, cuffed him and tossed his drivers license into the gutter, as a crowd of protesting onlookers gathered around.
After the column was published, the pressure on the columnist began. The LAPD approached the LA Times complaining about the column. They accused the columnist of being a liar. The LAPD furnished the Times with a 14-year-old tape of the incident. The LAPD claimed the tape proved Rall was lying about the stop, the officers poor treatment of him, even the crowd that protested.
The LAPD maintained the officer remained polite and professional throughout the incident and that Rall was never mistreated and that nobody rushed to his defense.
LA Times-editor-Nick-Goldberg-believed-the-cops-over-rall-in-the-ted-rall-lapd-la-times-scandalThe audio, which was of poor quality and hard to hear clearly, did include some polite conversation. But there was, on this tape, only 20 seconds of talk and fully 6 minutes of static and unintelligible noise.
But the editors of the LA Times agreed with the LAPD and accepted this flimsy evidence on face value. The Times fired its columnist. Then the Times went a step further and went public with its firing, questioning Ralls integrity in a formal published note for all to read, and severing all ties with him.
<snip>
It took only three days for Rall to get the tape examined and discover it had been altered. Any journalist could have found an audio engineer and conducted such basic fact-checking.
Before making such a serious accusation against a journalist, neither the LAPD nor the LAT took the time to examine the evidence with thorough science.
The enhanced tape, released by Rall and aNewDomain Friday, provides a more complete picture of what happened that day on Melrose Avenue. Listen here.
A little over three minutes in, an onlooker can clearly be heard loudly asking Officer Durr to take off the handcuffs twice.
<snip>
http://anewdomain.net/2015/08/01/ted-rall-lapd-la-firing-scandal-rall-vindicated-lapd-under-fire-exclusive/
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LA Times fires Ted Rall for criticizing LAPD after saying he lied about them; turns out LAPD lied [View all]
villager
Aug 2015
OP
Ted is right in this instance. Good on him. It does not change his racist depiction of President
msanthrope
Aug 2015
#6
I saw the comments about Rall on this forum. I refrained from replying until now.
Gregorian
Aug 2015
#3
Editing and distorting tapes and videos with malicious intent, all propaganda permitted by media, allows evil to win.
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#5
Tampering with evidence is a crime. If LAPD is about the rule of law, they will charge the tamperer
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2015
#16