Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
6. Yeah,
Thu May 17, 2012, 11:36 PM
May 2012

"Vote for Democrats. You have no choice, really."

...if you're desperate for a reason:

<...>

We still have over 30 million Americans who cannot see a doctor when they are sick. According to this Harvard study, adjusting for gender, race, smoking, weight, and just about everything else that you can think of, in any given year, the uninsured are 40% more likely to die than the insured are. That results in 44,789 additional deaths in America each year. All of which are avoidable.

This is more than twice the number of homicides in America.

It is more than ten times the number of deaths on 9/11. And it happens every year.

Do you think that we should solve this problem? I do.

And the Democratic Party does. Which is why we passed health care reform. And why we brought the wrath of lobbyists and their sewer money down on our heads in the last election – over $65 million by the Chamber of Commerce and Karl Rove’s “American Crossroads” alone.

I see one party taking on the special interests and enacting laws to keep Americans alive, and assure that you can see a doctor when you are sick. Like in every other industrialized country in the world.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/1/20/937697/-What-I-Didnt-Hear



CQ: Obama's Winning Streak On Hill Unprecedented
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122436116



The reason the 111th Congress is considered one of the most productive ever is because they got things done. Add the policy achievements and it has been a damn good Presidency.

Food Stamps Reduced The Poverty Rate By Nearly 8 Percent In 2009, As GOP Tries To Gut The Program

By Travis Waldron

Congressional Republicans have targeted the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), better known as food stamps, for budget cuts, and have attempted to paint it as a program rife with fraud and abuse that is on an unsustainable path. While their argument ignores a host of facts, including that food stamp fraud is at an all-time low, it also ignores the economic benefits that the program brings to millions of low-income families.

According to a new study from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, food stamps substantially reduced the poverty rate in 2009, the last year data is available, the New York Times reports:

The food stamp program…reduced the poverty rate by nearly 8 percent in 2009, the most recent year included in the study, a significant impact for a social program whose effects often go unnoticed by policy makers. [...]

The study, which examined nine years of data, tried to measure the program’s effects on people whose incomes remained below the poverty threshold. The program lifted the average poor person’s income up about six percent closer to the line over the length of the study, making poverty less severe. When the benefits were included in the income of families with children, the result was that children below the threshold moved about 11 percent closer to the line.

The USDA study aligns closely with a similar one released by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, which found that food stamps reduced the number of Americans living in extreme poverty in 2011 from 1.46 million to just over 800,000. SNAP’s effects on children are even bigger — the program cut the number living in extreme poverty by half, according to CBPP.

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/04/10/461337/food-stamps-reduce-poverty/


The benefits increases via the stimulus expire next year.

<...>

The Recovery Act’s increase in SNAP benefits has eased hardship and boosted the economy. SNAP has not only expanded dramatically to meet rising need during the recession, but has also delivered more than $26 billion (between April 2009 and September 2011) in additional SNAP benefits under the Recovery Act. The Recovery Act provided a temporary, 13.6 percent boost in the maximum SNAP benefit beginning in federal fiscal year 2009. Congress enacted this provision as a fast and effective economic stimulus measure to help push against the rising tide of hardship for low-income Americans. The increase is phasing down and is scheduled to end entirely on October 31, 2013.

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3239


Obama administration issues report on homelessness in 2011; awards $1.5 billion to local programs
http://www.democraticunderground.com/100249786

http://www.feedthefuture.gov/

16 million: number of Americans who become eligible for Medicaid under the health care law
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002531684

Obamacare will save Medicare $200 billion by 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002599800

http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/03/barack-obamas-had-pretty-damn-good-presidency
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002530308

Obama 2012!
I find it ironic that you invoke FDR. TheWraith May 2012 #1
In FDR's first four years, unemployment dropped by 40% and MannyGoldstein May 2012 #4
And then ProSense May 2012 #7
If it went from 25% to 12% in his first 4 years, Manny's wrong. It dropped 52%. rug May 2012 #9
Not quite, but your graph does have value MannyGoldstein May 2012 #12
So FDR gets a pass for not being a "full-fledged Liberal" but you're holding your nose for Obama?! FarLeftFist May 2012 #15
At least FDR was willing to try Liberal policies MannyGoldstein May 2012 #22
What do you mean "FDR" tried them? Without that Congress, none of it could have treestar May 2012 #126
Really? ProSense May 2012 #17
Really. MannyGoldstein May 2012 #23
I'm guessing the exclamation point at the end. Luminous Animal May 2012 #30
Actually, ProSense May 2012 #32
You must think I'm some sort of idealogue MannyGoldstein May 2012 #33
Did you ProSense May 2012 #36
H... Luminous Animal May 2012 #40
Yes. My mother is an expert on this. She lived through that time. JDPriestly May 2012 #55
People easily forget who Obama's first Chief of Staff (Rahm Emmanuel) was and coalition_unwilling May 2012 #113
Don't be deterred. We can do better.. mvd May 2012 #8
Yes ProSense May 2012 #10
We just won't agree all the time. But.. mvd May 2012 #14
Times have changed ALOT since FDR FarLeftFist May 2012 #13
Given that imports and exports were only a small percentage of GDP back then MannyGoldstein May 2012 #16
That's exactly my point. We made stuff HERE and our citizens bought stuff made HERE. FarLeftFist May 2012 #19
So you'll join me in fighting "free" trade agreements? MannyGoldstein May 2012 #25
Except you're not fighting anything, except here on DU. Meanwhile, I'm in the streets OFTEN. FarLeftFist May 2012 #50
LOL. That's not fair! MannyGoldstein May 2012 #69
And then ProSense May 2012 #21
Reciprocal trade agreements can work. JDPriestly May 2012 #59
"Free" Trade is bad Icicle May 2012 #89
"Trade agreements" are what we have bhikkhu May 2012 #121
And then our greedy millionaires decided they could make more money if they JDPriestly May 2012 #57
Not to mention the Pecora Commission which educated Americans about the JDPriestly May 2012 #54
The Pecora Commission ProSense May 2012 #56
Bush and the Republicans? Who cares. They left when the realization JDPriestly May 2012 #63
The Pecora Commission ProSense May 2012 #74
Given that Bush prosecuted more financial fraud than Obama... MannyGoldstein May 2012 #67
Yeah, ProSense May 2012 #71
I'm a fan of Bush? Really? MannyGoldstein May 2012 #73
You keep ProSense May 2012 #76
Correlation does not imply causation MannyGoldstein May 2012 #84
It was not FDR alone treestar May 2012 #125
Thank you!. nevergiveup May 2012 #5
FDR Was Elected To FOUR TERMS... 'Nuff Said... WillyT May 2012 #37
He rounded up American citizens into internment camps. Obama more progressive. NUFF SAID! FarLeftFist May 2012 #51
If we were at war, let's say, with Mexico, who knows what Obama would do. JDPriestly May 2012 #60
Seriously? Not if you go by economics only. mmonk May 2012 #66
How many Japanese-Americans were killed by the camps? MannyGoldstein May 2012 #68
So ProSense May 2012 #72
Which part of "Interning Japanese-Americans was wrong." do MannyGoldstein May 2012 #75
So why ProSense May 2012 #77
Already explained. nt MannyGoldstein May 2012 #83
Wow... Your Sweeping Grasp Of History Is Truly... WillyT May 2012 #86
According to my parents who lived through the Depression and my mother, JDPriestly May 2012 #53
+ 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!! WillyT May 2012 #87
I still have some sugar ration stamps. Sheets of them. JDPriestly May 2012 #96
Jesus Christ, people! ibegurpard May 2012 #58
Sore winners. nt MannyGoldstein May 2012 #98
Or maybe we don't believe you're being genuine...nt SidDithers May 2012 #108
Don't you have anyone in your own party that needs loyalty testing? Dragonfli May 2012 #116
... SidDithers May 2012 #118
. Dragonfli May 2012 #119
It's interesting how these vociferous critics treestar May 2012 #127
Damn! That thread got 238 recs! That's gotta be up there for DU3! Poll_Blind May 2012 #2
me, too... n/t chervilant May 2012 #97
Your post, while strongly put, had good points mvd May 2012 #3
Yeah, ProSense May 2012 #6
Pro ... slipslidingaway May 2012 #38
Apparently, ProSense May 2012 #46
you seem to ignore facts and data krawhitham May 2012 #48
Speaking of ProSense May 2012 #49
They should get a friend who agrees with them and start walking their precinct. JDPriestly May 2012 #62
Actually, ProSense May 2012 #80
Ah, a list of "accomplishments." How original. JDPriestly May 2012 #61
False. ProSense May 2012 #79
I am amazed at folks I know who eat beans often Thinkingabout May 2012 #11
Manny. I am moderate. But like you, Liz Warren has my vote. bluestate10 May 2012 #18
Well, I'd give you a run for your money. MannyGoldstein May 2012 #24
The last Republican I voted for was Sen. Nancy Landon Kassebaum longship May 2012 #20
I agreed with your post last night, and I agree with this post today. ScreamingMeemie May 2012 #26
"I will never work against a Dem." ProSense May 2012 #27
Yep. A lot of us here are of the same mind. Zorra May 2012 #28
I'll do what I can MannyGoldstein May 2012 #31
Our best bet is to make sure the majority in both houses Jamaal510 May 2012 #29
+1000 abelenkpe May 2012 #42
+10,000! lunasun May 2012 #47
Here is a choice. Herlong May 2012 #34
Should he look at pictures of kittens and bunny wabbits too? just1voice May 2012 #91
No choice is a tough pill to swallow! Amster Dan May 2012 #35
Vote for Democrats but take a long look in the mirror. pa28 May 2012 #39
Voting democratic is why I CAN look in the mirror. Herlong May 2012 #41
I was all ready to say "you forgot the sarcasm smiley", but NashvilleLefty May 2012 #43
It's also about the realization that if we don't get out the vote, our vote is pointless. Herlong May 2012 #45
As a woman of course I vote D abelenkpe May 2012 #44
I'm with you, Manny. And I, too, am fortunate enough to get to vote for one JDPriestly May 2012 #52
I pretty much vote a straight ticket these days. Rhiannon12866 May 2012 #64
yah that pretty much sums up my feelings too Douglas Carpenter May 2012 #65
Thank you DonCoquixote May 2012 #70
Bottom line jambo101 May 2012 #78
dem party = vote for us, we suck less. KG May 2012 #81
Just can't bring yourself to say "Vote for Obama", eh?...nt SidDithers May 2012 #82
Neither can I. bvar22 May 2012 #88
Well, he said he would vote for Democrats plural and encouraged others to as well, How many Dems Dragonfli May 2012 #99
... SidDithers May 2012 #100
. Dragonfli May 2012 #103
Thanks! MannyGoldstein May 2012 #102
I have perhaps 100 replies to me consisting of nothing but dots and a smiley. Dragonfli May 2012 #107
Obama's not a Democrat? morningfog May 2012 #105
All Democrats are Obama?...nt SidDithers May 2012 #110
Wouldn't a vote for Democrats, especially in General Forum, include Obama? morningfog May 2012 #112
Maybe it would be a good idea to NOT spend the next 6 months discouraging people about Democrats scheming daemons May 2012 #85
Hmmm... Maybe we can make a deal... MannyGoldstein May 2012 #94
Maybe it's not the people who are at fault, maybe if Democrats start working for those sabrina 1 May 2012 #104
We aren't just victims treestar May 2012 #128
We really do not choose our leaders. There are selection committees that choose who will run with sabrina 1 May 2012 #129
Exactly just1voice May 2012 #90
That would look great on a bumper sticker, KamaAina May 2012 #92
Occupy. Fire Walk With Me May 2012 #93
!!! MannyGoldstein May 2012 #95
Lots of people.... Good to see.... midnight May 2012 #101
I wanted to reply to your post but to be honest I have reached the same conclusions Dragonfli May 2012 #106
... SidDithers May 2012 #109
. Dragonfli May 2012 #117
Seems like a lot of us have reached the same conclusion! MannyGoldstein May 2012 #122
As always, straight Dem ticket for me. SammyWinstonJack May 2012 #111
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #114
I, for one, appreciate your willingness to see both sides of the situation. randome May 2012 #115
Thanks for your half-hearted and belated MineralMan May 2012 #120
Looking for a full-throated endorsement of "free" trade, lower corporate taxes, MannyGoldstein May 2012 #123
I have a choice nolabels May 2012 #124
not good enough Manny!! Unless you can love and believe in President Obama and the Democratic Party Douglas Carpenter May 2012 #130
For a certain group, clearly. MannyGoldstein May 2012 #131
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vote for Democrats. We ha...»Reply #6