Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)

1. I think the rulings of the last 7-10 days were not activist.

Reply to stevenleser (Original post)

Mon Jun 29, 2015, 02:05 PM

Jun 2015

The LGBT marriage case, for instance, was a classic 14th amendment issue. Outside of prevarication or willful ignorance, I don't see how anyone would miss that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Would you consider this Supreme Court an "activist" Court? [View all] stevenleser Jun 2015 OP

I think the rulings of the last 7-10 days were not activist. stevenleser Jun 2015 #1

Trying to rationalize that there is stare decisis for coporate personhood IS judicial activism! cascadiance Jun 2015 #2

I have no idea where that decision came from and I am certainly not going to defend it. My point is stevenleser Jun 2015 #3

I think you are right that there was a political element to them... cascadiance Jun 2015 #4

Corporate personhood dates back to 1590 or so Recursion Jun 2015 #7

What does "activist" mean. GeorgeGist Jun 2015 #5

nope Liberal_in_LA Jun 2015 #6

No, but litigants have been increasingly activist Recursion Jun 2015 #8

People say the court is "activist" when it rules against their views. former9thward Jun 2015 #9

Judges are not Lawmakers, they are Arbiters. Theses are Lawmaker judges, superseding Dont call me Shirley Jun 2015 #10

I Voted Yes ProfessorGAC Jun 2015 #11