Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court Refuses to Hear North Carolina Forced Ultrasound Law (gynoticians lose one!) [View all]appal_jack
(3,813 posts)6. The fact that Scalia dissented indicates that he has gone totally off the rails.
Scalia, a supposed free-speech advocate (I still rather like his 1989 Texas v Johnson opinion re flag burning) was the lone dissenter here. Thus he was supporting a law that would have compelled doctors to give an untruthful and unwanted scripted speech to the patients they are supposed to serve. He is a senile old fool these days, choking on his bile, hypocrisy, and bitterness.
Retire already, Scalia: you have no business 'interpreting' (i.e- trampling) the Constitution any longer!
K&R,
-app
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court Refuses to Hear North Carolina Forced Ultrasound Law (gynoticians lose one!) [View all]
niyad
Jun 2015
OP
Good, hopefully similar rulings will come down on other restrictions like the one in Texas
mythology
Jun 2015
#3
it is absolutely disgusting and obscene that, in the 21st century, we are still fighting these
niyad
Jun 2015
#4
lack of self-esteem, fear, ignorance, or, a sense of superiority conferred by one's religious belief
niyad
Jun 2015
#32
that is what has these crazies so terrified--the thought that we just might take up arms!
niyad
Jun 2015
#10
that is what the gynoticians do!! so, why is it that we cannot sue them? or can we?
niyad
Jun 2015
#30
That's a great question. We have to start getting more creative and more relentless
calimary
Jun 2015
#40
The fact that Scalia dissented indicates that he has gone totally off the rails.
appal_jack
Jun 2015
#6
PLUS - the damned violation of her will continue. Just no special effects. The GOP won't be satisied
freshwest
Jun 2015
#41