Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: NYC_SKP has been banned [View all]

merrily

(45,251 posts)
688. agree that the search on this site is near useless.
Thu Jun 4, 2015, 03:20 PM
Jun 2015

and I cannot get advanced search to work AT ALL. It times out every single time, even if I am looking for something I posted a week ago.

NYC_SKP has been banned [View all] cyberswede Jun 2015 OP
Thank you Earl G. nt. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #1
Guess I can take him off my ignore list. misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #437
Me too. old guy Jun 2015 #734
Of course. And then that one will be Ignored & Trashed too. misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #748
That was nasty, rude over the top inappropriate, imo. . 2banon Jun 2015 #868
Like SKP's misogynistic slur? Cha Jun 2015 #1017
It wasn't his slur. HERE'S WHAT WAS REALLY SAID IN HIS EXCHANGE WITH A TROLL leveymg Jun 2015 #1057
SKP owns it.. Proudly put it in his journal too. Cha Jun 2015 #1071
Which clearly shows that the term wasn't applied to ANY person, including Hillary. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #1076
Which clearly show it was Directed right at Hillary Clinton. You're not helping SKP by denying it Cha Jun 2015 #1077
It does nothing of the sort. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #1078
Yes it does..and, there's another set of spinners whining because he got banned bc it was directed Cha Jun 2015 #1079
Nice, detailed, rigorous defense of your point. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #1080
Sorry, your defense won't work with the Admins. Doubt very much if SKP uses it. He wouldn't want to Cha Jun 2015 #1081
It wasn't intended as a defense of Skip's ill-considered post. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #1082
DU is really weird these days, too much nastiness and rudeness. It isn't good or necessary. uppityperson Jun 2015 #2
Agreed Sherman A1 Jun 2015 #4
As much as I enjoyed my couple of stints on MIRT TBF Jun 2015 #259
We all had a common enemy. calimary Jun 2015 #540
Thoughtful post - TBF Jun 2015 #640
I'm an Eisenhower baby. I remember vague stuff about the Kennedys, mainly calimary Jun 2015 #821
A very good post. stage left Jun 2015 #763
We still have a common enemy, the Oligarchy. That includes Goldman-Sachs and the Wall Street rhett o rick Jun 2015 #880
And the name of their game is Divide and Conquer and that is what the oligarchs are doing here Dont call me Shirley Jun 2015 #1024
true heaven05 Jun 2015 #889
It was. Hissyspit Jun 2015 #731
You are absolutely right. 7962 Jun 2015 #284
they didn't ban members who outed roguevalley Jun 2015 #846
Holy crap THAT happened?? Wow. 7962 Jun 2015 #906
... TorchTheWitch Jun 2015 #1049
thank you, TorchTheWitch. I am STILL reeling over it and the roguevalley Jun 2015 #1066
Don't know why Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2015 #511
This is a pillow fight VS 2008 krawhitham Jun 2015 #592
THAT is the analogy i was looking for! Joe the Revelator Jun 2015 #793
Not just weird, but downright creepy. KMOD Jun 2015 #625
That's a shame, but ultimately necessery Cali_Democrat Jun 2015 #3
Shame n2doc Jun 2015 #5
decent guy until he went completely off the rails. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #6
He's been teetering on the edge of my ignore list for months Warpy Jun 2015 #636
I just called him out a few weeks ago on the increasing weirdness of his posts that were, of course, Number23 Jun 2015 #799
Then why doesn't he have more hidden posts? The guy had no hidden posts for the past 90 days. Hiraeth Jun 2015 #1029
Jury system sucks. People who are popular enough geek tragedy Jun 2015 #1033
I agree with you that the jury system sucks however, I have seen people post jury results on alerted Hiraeth Jun 2015 #1034
This is one if the many problems with rule by jury geek tragedy Jun 2015 #1042
No one dropped the C-Bomb however, clear was the implication and given the context, after reviewing Hiraeth Jun 2015 #1043
decent guy my foot. trueblue2007 Jun 2015 #1067
This is a shame. He was a hero and leader to many here. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #7
yeah, the post totally should have been hidden 7-0, but geek tragedy Jun 2015 #10
We are all human... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #22
Obviously. I'd never call Sarah Palin or Phyllis Schlafly that. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #33
Idiots, cretins, miscreants. yahoos, reprobates, goobers, but not the C word. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #52
Assholes is good. Not hard at all to stay away from sexist or racist slurs if you respect others.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #74
What host are you referring to? marym625 Jun 2015 #685
It's all bullshit, he didn't call her the c-word, not even close Dragonfli Jun 2015 #801
looks to me like he was mocking the tombstone poster marym625 Jun 2015 #876
I googled the words as exactly as he posted it... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #899
This is a bit shocking to me... yuiyoshida Jun 2015 #973
While I Cannot Disagree. . . ProfessorGAC Jun 2015 #186
He's been insulting DUers for a long time now. MADem Jun 2015 #250
Lesson is even when your posts survive a jury, the admins can still see the alerts wyldwolf Jun 2015 #847
True...the alerts, and DUer's reactions as jurors to the MADem Jun 2015 #905
I doubt it was just that one post BainsBane Jun 2015 #771
Part of it is that there's practically no one who's saying "he couldn't have meant geek tragedy Jun 2015 #776
He hated Clinton, no question BainsBane Jun 2015 #782
he had also tried to blame the Charlie Hebdo victims by insisting that those geek tragedy Jun 2015 #787
Great post DSB MissDeeds Jun 2015 #193
I feel bad for SKP DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #218
I wondered too about impulse control MissDeeds Jun 2015 #244
I posted a thread in reference to that blm Jun 2015 #401
Curious lark Jun 2015 #265
I'm not God but I would have given him a thirty day timeout, long enough to miss the place. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #302
I think the bans already been lifted lark Jun 2015 #330
What makes you think the ban has been lifted? I would be happy if it has been. madfloridian Jun 2015 #527
No it hasn't. Posting privileges still revoked. nt City Lights Jun 2015 #613
For a person on for 7 year, can't a 30 day suspension work? yeoman6987 Jun 2015 #440
He never used that word, never called her that, it's all made up nasty shit to ban a critic. /nt Dragonfli Jun 2015 #804
Come on BainsBane Jun 2015 #832
I honestly don't see it, I see word twisting to achieve a goal Dragonfli Jun 2015 #840
I am against the ongoing movement here to label individual words as "inappropriate".... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2015 #927
EarlG is the one who translated it BainsBane Jun 2015 #971
Bull fucking shit. And nobody ever called Mrs. Clinton a name when they passed this Photo shop around in 2008 Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2015 #980
Here's how I see it... context is everything and I could be a thousand miles off base here. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #855
I think when some saw "cunning stunt" awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #862
I'm late to the issue, but my reading of it was the same. ladyVet Jun 2015 #1069
I didn't know it when I posted awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #1072
He got banned for THAT? hifiguy Jun 2015 #890
I think the usage of the pronoun is key Horse with no Name Jun 2015 #1039
BINGO !!! Hoppy Jun 2015 #298
I agree so much. I've been a fan since I first joined DU. I think it's unfortunate RKP5637 Jun 2015 #242
agreed samsingh Jun 2015 #328
Well said! n/t marym625 Jun 2015 #717
This is true. He was one of my favorite DUers. hifiguy Jun 2015 #886
Oh wow. Way the hell over the top. Autumn Jun 2015 #8
Both his post and the banning... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #863
Primary time is always the worst times of DU. Coventina Jun 2015 #9
It sure is. I'm utterly stunned by the nastiness here... n/t Adrahil Jun 2015 #56
NYC_SKP used to be a mod on DU2. He will be missed. I hope the admins give him another chance. L0oniX Jun 2015 #11
He's had a rough couple of years. Three complicated surgeries... KoKo Jun 2015 #45
He joked that it was a tongue twister. He was definitely referencing that word. n/t Adrahil Jun 2015 #61
Now even referencing a word will get you banned? zeemike Jun 2015 #581
Please don't. I enjoy your posts. merrily Jun 2015 #644
And I enjoy yours, as well as many in this forum zeemike Jun 2015 #666
If you leave, you can still read our posts, but we cannot read yours. merrily Jun 2015 #684
Well it is unlikely that I will stop replying to people who I highly respect. zeemike Jun 2015 #1058
Good to know. merrily Jun 2015 #1059
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cunning%20stunt Adrahil Jun 2015 #1054
Well I am weird I know, but no word is intolerable for me zeemike Jun 2015 #1056
Welp, that's an opinion. Adrahil Jun 2015 #1062
Well of course it is, that is what the rights of ownership is all about. zeemike Jun 2015 #1064
I get what you're saying.... Adrahil Jun 2015 #1065
What did he actually say? I know people have been trying to have him banned but I can't believe Dragonfli Jun 2015 #785
I'm a newbie by NYC_SKP standards. Paka Jun 2015 #860
I like you am just a lurker, as a matter in fact I haven't posted for years. billymayshere Jun 2015 #934
It is the "it can be a tongue twister" awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #866
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cunning%20stunt Adrahil Jun 2015 #1055
Sorry to hear that, I didn't know he'd been dealing with all of that. polly7 Jun 2015 #67
and had brain surgery recently marym625 Jun 2015 #72
I do not think there was justification for this. So now cunning stunt is a code word for cunt? Not jwirr Jun 2015 #78
* L0oniX Jun 2015 #88
Absolutely. He is banned because he supports someone else and was doing a good job of it. EarlG jwirr Jun 2015 #103
That is simply bullshit. zappaman Jun 2015 #108
C*nt is not "legit" and he should be embarrassing true supporters of any and all Dem candidates with bettyellen Jun 2015 #127
I surrender. You all know so much more than any of us anyhow. jwirr Jun 2015 #138
"You all", lol. Women are the Dem base- try respecting them instead of trying to dismiss and bettyellen Jun 2015 #155
She is part of them marym625 Jun 2015 #168
Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #243
So you are referring to another woman as an object? blackspade Jun 2015 #340
Not a fair comment. Raine1967 Jun 2015 #411
That comment is probably itself alertable, Jackpine Radical Jun 2015 #467
Yes, we women have been part of the Dem base for most of our lives. Mary and I are part of the Dem sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #983
We're criticizing you for the thing you said that was wrong CreekDog Jun 2015 #646
This message was self-deleted by its author tblue37 Jun 2015 #770
C*nt is not "legit".... bvar22 Jun 2015 #653
Thank you.. whathehell Jun 2015 #733
He called no one any such thing and you damn well know it Dragonfli Jun 2015 #807
Talk about dishonesty... Adrahil Jun 2015 #1051
You know he didn't write the word "cunt" demwing Jun 2015 #838
Oh really? Adrahil Jun 2015 #1053
I'm sad you think this. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #153
Oh my fucking god, I can't keep up with all the "insert letter here"-words. Ed Suspicious Jun 2015 #206
I'm going to throw a guess out there that it rhymes with ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #213
I hope not. If it is alerted on, the jury should surely vote to leave 7 to 0. Context matters. nt merrily Jun 2015 #657
Bernie's Jewish. bluedigger Jun 2015 #223
Chill dude. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #235
nope...he wasn't doing a good job recently Sheepshank Jun 2015 #634
who else was banned for supporting Sanders today? CreekDog Jun 2015 #641
EarlG turned me into a newt... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #867
he called it a "tongue twister", come on CreekDog Jun 2015 #115
Which is weird, because people come right out and say horrendous stuff. It might ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #217
actually I have seen a few longtime members banned for using the "C" word CreekDog Jun 2015 #234
Who? morningfog Jun 2015 #308
You don't think they should be? nt boston bean Jun 2015 #344
Where did you get that? morningfog Jun 2015 #504
This thread here is an example of one, no? boston bean Jun 2015 #510
You are deflecting now. morningfog Jun 2015 #517
So, in your view it would be ok to use and not deserve a banning because others didn't get banned. boston bean Jun 2015 #525
You don't understand my view at all. Slow down. morningfog Jun 2015 #552
I don't know. I'm happy to see it getting the treatment it deserves. boston bean Jun 2015 #555
I suspect the last one is a big part of the reason passiveporcupine Jun 2015 #754
... Kali Jun 2015 #887
NYC_SKIP. Rex Jun 2015 #435
^^^This times 1,000^^^ Quackers Jun 2015 #495
+1001 MissDeeds Jun 2015 #702
It is loud and clear marym625 Jun 2015 #704
Indeed, it's written right there in the reason n/t arcane1 Jun 2015 #966
yep. marym625 Jun 2015 #988
Glad I'm not the only who saw that. L0oniX Jun 2015 #803
The "offending" phrase is a bit of (primarily) British wordplay hifiguy Jun 2015 #894
I agree BuelahWitch Jun 2015 #237
Was it it okay to call candidate Obama the N-word? deurbano Jun 2015 #338
Of course, not even if the person was clever about it./NT DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #908
who said said it?? Quayblue Jun 2015 #993
Nobody said it. I was responding to a poster who wrote: deurbano Jun 2015 #997
Seriously? CherokeeDem Jun 2015 #252
This message was self-deleted by its author 840high Jun 2015 #420
That is indisputable MissDeeds Jun 2015 #695
Google that phrase jberryhill Jun 2015 #96
yes it is zappaman Jun 2015 #98
Thanks for the context. bluedigger Jun 2015 #233
If someone called my mom or girlfriend the c word he, me or we are going to the hospital. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #118
I agree with you on this just not the ban. Politics. jwirr Jun 2015 #131
I said up thread I don't agree with the banning. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #158
I agree bravenak Jun 2015 #515
Really??? You still believe in "fighting words" ha ha Cosmic Kitten Jun 2015 #322
I live in the real world. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #368
Slow down Cassius Clay. No need for it to come to fisticuffs. Ed Suspicious Jun 2015 #448
You don't think if I drop the wrong epithet on the wrong person I am going to get a whuppin ? DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #488
Yes, it is. Switch the first letters, the consonants and see what it says. uppityperson Jun 2015 #132
Here ya go. Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #136
It's a sad state of affairs when we start using urban dictionary as a reference. Exilednight Jun 2015 #1020
Only if we're writing a scholarly article and don't attribute the source properly. n/t Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #1023
If that's your logic, then Fux news is a credible reference. Exilednight Jun 2015 #1027
Fox is a credible source when one is pointing out RW bias in media. Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #1028
Google it tammywammy Jun 2015 #141
Nucking futs. NuclearDem Jun 2015 #241
Whut..... I dunt git it. nt. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #580
Not quite the same. Ms. Toad Jun 2015 #740
I would never make that connection. Says more about the alerter than the poster. GoneFishin Jun 2015 #251
The poster is the one who POSTED it tkmorris Jun 2015 #275
Thank you! Paka Jun 2015 #869
Exactly. I find the word vulgar. I can cuss with the best of them, but I wince when I hear the word. GoneFishin Jun 2015 #910
and even if I did make the connection, it is still only an implication, much in the same way Hiraeth Jun 2015 #1035
Because you've never dreamt it, so, it couldn't be?? boston bean Jun 2015 #255
Seriously, it's not even code. It's a spoonerism. NuclearDem Jun 2015 #280
This ^ PeaceNikki Jun 2015 #622
Even with that being true, the meaning is clear. Rex Jun 2015 #663
Not making excuses, just observing: merrily Jun 2015 #711
I see that a lot of posters don't know what it means, guess I am wrong. Rex Jun 2015 #739
I read some posts about it and got nauseous--and I've been through a lot of surgery. merrily Jun 2015 #750
and we all know what the poster implied with the pictures in the "Not Good Enough" OP . Hiraeth Jun 2015 #1036
Are you completely obtuse? MADem Jun 2015 #281
I'm an old fart, Paka Jun 2015 #873
I'm an old fart too, but that piece of ... snark predates the internet. nt MADem Jun 2015 #881
Seen it MANY times over the years. Its not a "new" thing. 7962 Jun 2015 #297
You must not be a Metallica fan. octoberlib Jun 2015 #378
Agree. 840high Jun 2015 #416
Is that what he posted? Cunning stunt? peacebird Jun 2015 #458
Yep- in hopes a jury would not get it and he'd evade a reprimand. bettyellen Jun 2015 #533
Yes. Hissyspit Jun 2015 #809
It was a blatant and obvious bullshit excuse, he called no one the c word, no one at all. Dragonfli Jun 2015 #811
Nice try. zappaman Jun 2015 #813
Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #816
Like I said zappaman Jun 2015 #817
Learn to read Dragonfli Jun 2015 #819
I can read fine. zappaman Jun 2015 #823
Yes, thats a long known way to use the word. 7962 Jun 2015 #293
Good grief. I would never have twisted "cunning stunt" into the c word.... peacebird Jun 2015 #471
Yep. Even has its own entry in the "urban dictionary": 7962 Jun 2015 #628
And dog forbid anyone use cockney rhyming slang! Divernan Jun 2015 #751
That is true, but, prior to this thread, I was unfamiliar with the term. merrily Jun 2015 #788
Me too peacebird Jun 2015 #798
Witch hunters are very clever at finding "witch marks" where a pimple exists Dragonfli Jun 2015 #818
I agree with all you have said and feel we have lost a strong voice. DUers snappyturtle Jun 2015 #397
I hope so, he has been through the mill with his health issues and brain surgery. Autumn Jun 2015 #68
Hide yea ...ban? L0oniX Jun 2015 #76
I can't remember for sure who called Hillary the c word in 2007 but they didn't get banned. Autumn Jun 2015 #86
Of course the D word has gotten a lot of use too without bans. L0oniX Jun 2015 #97
It is what it is. Autumn Jun 2015 #102
IMO, avoiding all genitalia words as slurs is preferable. merrily Jun 2015 #680
We haven't gotten the word in the Gungeon. Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #725
But no gets outraged over "prick" Mnpaul Jun 2015 #929
Why would you say that to someone who posted she does not use that kind of term? merrily Jun 2015 #957
I was just curious on how you felt about that term Mnpaul Jun 2015 #981
Probably because most guys dont really care about it. or "prick" either. 7962 Jun 2015 #932
Should have been banned then lark Jun 2015 #285
Just go to 'site search' and look and see how many have used the actual word and survived. Rex Jun 2015 #426
I thought I had that thread bookmarked but some of those old threads no longer exist. Autumn Jun 2015 #463
If this will make some think before posting nasty shit about the other guy/gals pony Rex Jun 2015 #478
If this means Skinner has less tolerance for misogyny (as Earl G has for years) then I'll take it... bettyellen Jun 2015 #573
No I don't think so. Rex Jun 2015 #604
I am with you on that. If Skinner finally sees how fucked up it is- he is now way ahead of many here bettyellen Jun 2015 #617
Very true, plus being a bigot is not very progressive imo. Rex Jun 2015 #633
Agree. Because when women were complaining about misogyny and stalking nothing was done. cui bono Jun 2015 #544
Pages and pages. Rex Jun 2015 #560
agree that the search on this site is near useless. merrily Jun 2015 #688
Or not anti- women. Wow! Imagine that. bettyellen Jun 2015 #91
I have to stand up for EarlG on this one - TBF Jun 2015 #133
For now the only safe place from the haters is the Bernie Sanders group. L0oniX Jun 2015 #144
It's been like that for the leftynyc Jun 2015 #457
Not even. merrily Jun 2015 #942
There is a forum for Bernie here.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #185
I do tend to look at greatest threads every day - TBF Jun 2015 #212
There seems to be a heightened level of hostility to women here and bettyellen Jun 2015 #240
Which host of the Bernie forum laughed along at the c*nt tongue twister ? Autumn Jun 2015 #215
You can refer back to the original thread - am not linking to it as requested because bettyellen Jun 2015 #228
Would you PM the link to me please? No host in the Bernie group is laughing at that post Autumn Jun 2015 #230
Wait- was Skip the host referred to in that thread? bettyellen Jun 2015 #268
Really? hootinholler Jun 2015 #497
Witness their discussions on how they cannot trust anyone in GD because they are not really bettyellen Jun 2015 #514
Well since you're saying you're pointing hootinholler Jun 2015 #557
There are two threads there discussing Sander's need to broaden his outreach.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #586
Hm, I haven't seen that. Can you provide an example? cui bono Jun 2015 #589
I think you nailed it with the "war room" mentality and how it does no one any good.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #639
It is interesting that EarlG and not Skinner banned him as they typically ban for very different uppityperson Jun 2015 #362
Agree - TBF Jun 2015 #489
well, not always... CreekDog Jun 2015 #676
You can always hang in the Bernie Group here. Then, there is the Bernie campaign's page merrily Jun 2015 #735
I agree with the hide and even a time out without 5 hides Ichingcarpenter Jun 2015 #256
Me too. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #77
+1 BainsBane Jun 2015 #520
Me, too, L0oniX... MrMickeysMom Jun 2015 #956
About.Fucking.Time. truebrit71 Jun 2015 #12
Hey, what's up buddy? pintobean Jun 2015 #588
Sorry, which one was just banned and which one were you piling on about...buddy... truebrit71 Jun 2015 #626
You jumped my ass for gravedancing pintobean Jun 2015 #638
You are correct. You weren't grave-dancing... truebrit71 Jun 2015 #661
Ignore must be working pintobean Jun 2015 #710
LOL!!!! truebrit71 Jun 2015 #713
#FreeNYC_SKP Man from Pickens Jun 2015 #13
He already been free'd. Iggo Jun 2015 #24
+1 n/t JTFrog Jun 2015 #28
Nope. Keefer Jun 2015 #476
Free'd from his DU shackles, I meant. Iggo Jun 2015 #563
If only it could trend here on DU. jwirr Jun 2015 #87
Well, we all know this can happen to any of us, potentially. closeupready Jun 2015 #14
Uhhh, no this can't happen to just anyone. tammywammy Jun 2015 #214
Not going to spar with you, out of respect for the threadstarter. closeupready Jun 2015 #247
"I will never be banned...for using that word...because I don't use it" demwing Jun 2015 #1060
I'll buy this when... TreasonousBastard Jun 2015 #15
No, this has been a standard of behavior for the entire existence of DU. Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #20
I am well aware of that... TreasonousBastard Jun 2015 #58
It's part of being perceived as privileged. Calling me a dick is both appropriate and acceptable. Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #93
Considering that some inmates here have taken over the asylum, closeupready Jun 2015 #32
There are pejoratives and there are pejoratives DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #42
I find your post to be funny in an ironic sort of way. Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #261
I went back and changed c--t to the c word in all my posts on this topic.... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #299
They 'can' but I'm sure you will agree that Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #377
I have been having some trouble with all these letter words hfojvt Jun 2015 #1008
'Dickhead' is by no measure equivalent. Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #46
Sorry, those 2 words are not at all the same. lark Jun 2015 #310
Dick and prick are in fact used constantly and intentionally in a "mean and hateful" way. Smarmie Doofus Jun 2015 #935
No need to fret BainsBane Jun 2015 #496
+1 cui bono Jun 2015 #605
I remember well BainsBane Jun 2015 #683
Agree with you there. MindPilot Jun 2015 #694
Why? Very few men are particularly ruffled by being called a dickhead. Codeine Jun 2015 #1019
Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #16
Angry Supporters of Sanders. Iggo Jun 2015 #26
It was accidental, but oh so apropos. Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #64
"It was accidental" TBF Jun 2015 #84
as if... Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #94
Are you suggesting all Sanders supporters should be banned? nt TBF Jun 2015 #30
Stop. Agschmid Jun 2015 #40
Nope. Try again maybe? bettyellen Jun 2015 #53
If you can quote any part of anything I EVER SAID that would suggest banning all Sanders supports... Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #70
!!! Tarheel_Dem Jun 2015 #317
Well Capt. Obvious Jun 2015 #65
That post is a bit muddled. Your feeling is that Skippy was the only Sanders bad boy at DU? Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #101
I haven't met any of these angry supporters AgingAmerican Jun 2015 #257
Well, then all of "Angry Supporters of Sanders" better toe the line. madfloridian Jun 2015 #290
This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #321
That's ugly. madfloridian Jun 2015 #379
Yes, and not even that clever. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #385
Long past due leftynyc Jun 2015 #17
He's been grumpy lately jberryhill Jun 2015 #18
Please, no grave dancing. cleanhippie Jun 2015 #19
Unf unf unf AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #39
... trotsky Jun 2015 #499
Saw that coming a long time ago. demmiblue Jun 2015 #21
Dumb move on his part. nt City Lights Jun 2015 #23
He deserved it. DCBob Jun 2015 #25
+ 10000 This ^ misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #462
I'm gonna miss him. In_The_Wind Jun 2015 #27
So will I... haikugal Jun 2015 #405
Same here. eom. Raine1967 Jun 2015 #521
I will too. CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2015 #539
Me too. immoderate Jun 2015 #698
That is unfortunate. I will miss him but he shouldn't have gone that far. n/t Avalux Jun 2015 #29
Me thinks jamzrockz Jun 2015 #31
Why would you think he was doing nothing constructive with his life? polly7 Jun 2015 #49
I said jamzrockz Jun 2015 #239
That's right, everything you said was speculation. polly7 Jun 2015 #248
I wouldn't even call the dumbest GOP female candidate that Ugly word. misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #491
Yeah, me either. polly7 Jun 2015 #506
Mysogony misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #538
Or just a stupid play on words that he wouldn't normally have done but in a moment polly7 Jun 2015 #553
Yup. Not his fault, it was the "troll". misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #650
Selective reading for an agenda much? Bye, bye. Sorry it didn't work out for you. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #662
Yes, I didn't know much about him jamzrockz Jun 2015 #709
I didn't know about all his health scares either, that's very sad for him. polly7 Jun 2015 #714
I hear ya. misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #474
No, it's not true. That poster has absolutely no knowledge of NYC Skip's life. polly7 Jun 2015 #606
Embarrassing is defending someone who got banned for using the c-word misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #665
No, I spelled out what was embarrassing about that post. polly7 Jun 2015 #679
"This battle is O V E R. " Very telling use of words you have there. cui bono Jun 2015 #691
Good point! nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #699
+1 JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #343
Thank you EarlG. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #34
Agreed. n/t JTFrog Jun 2015 #63
Agree - EarlG has been very good TBF Jun 2015 #100
I myself do not think Skip was any representative Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #167
I remember when DU3 came online... he went absolutely ballistic towards a teacher or two. demmiblue Jun 2015 #219
He did. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #232
He was also very nasty to Atheists and Agnostics Heddi Jun 2015 #824
Wow, I missed all of that, outrageous. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #835
If I didn't want to relive the trauma of his hateful words, i'd dig up old posts for proof Heddi Jun 2015 #857
I remember when that happened. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #871
People want to blame his nastiness on his brain surgery Heddi Jun 2015 #874
I think DU3 destroyed him. pintobean Jun 2015 #895
There were many moderators who were called (by themselves and others) PermaMods Heddi Jun 2015 #903
What's amazing to me is how illiberal some liberals are DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #920
Well said Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2015 #1073
I didn't know about any of this. joshcryer Jun 2015 #1002
I'm no perfect angel either. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #1006
Yes, Mahalo Starry Messenger.. there are "Bernie Supporters" who aren't excusing this and really Cha Jun 2015 #1011
VINDICATION! AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #35
LOL! merrily Jun 2015 #992
That is way too severe marym625 Jun 2015 #36
I agree. femmocrat Jun 2015 #51
I agree also. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #60
I agree it is too severe. glinda Jun 2015 #165
Its not even about WHO he supported. This is about his nasty insulting personal attacks misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #508
I have had no issue with him. glinda Jun 2015 #678
I agree MissDeeds Jun 2015 #225
Yep. *smh* nt bunnies Jun 2015 #305
i'm a strong Hillary supporter, but i don't like banning people who don't think like me samsingh Jun 2015 #332
He wasn't banned for not supporting Hillary, nor was he banned misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #518
true enough - but still banning someone for a word in a world of free speech is excessive samsingh Jun 2015 #631
DU has its limits. Take up your "free speech" issue with Earl G. misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #670
He did NOT use that word. The two words he used meant nothing to clueless folks like me. madfloridian Jun 2015 #637
I liked him... Agschmid Jun 2015 #664
Just because you didn't recognize it doesn't mean he and everyone else didn't geek tragedy Jun 2015 #732
Certainly not "everyone else" Jim Lane Jun 2015 #996
I leave the decision about severity of punishment geek tragedy Jun 2015 #1018
Yes, the site owners can ban. And we can denounce the ban. Jim Lane Jun 2015 #1031
Then let the rules apply evenly across the board MissDeeds Jun 2015 #728
He wasn't banned for "not thinking like you".. he was banned for trying to be "clever" with his Cha Jun 2015 #1015
I agree. madfloridian Jun 2015 #399
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #591
And you know this how? hrmjustin Jun 2015 #599
years of lurking before they signed up, don't ya know. uppityperson Jun 2015 #615
That last post gave him away. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #660
Totally agree with you, Marym . . . markpkessinger Jun 2015 #706
"Posting Priveleges Revoked" Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #37
nope he's gone otherwise it would say under review Romeo.lima333 Jun 2015 #73
The only way this could become temporary is if he sends an email to Skinner asking to be reinstated. In_The_Wind Jun 2015 #104
Except he didn't actually use that word. Did he? Comrade Grumpy Jun 2015 #135
No, not really. So maybe Skinner will let NYC_SKP return. In_The_Wind Jun 2015 #271
Yes, he did. Arguing format over content and cowering behind implication is simply puerile. LanternWaste Jun 2015 #339
Like when Barbara Bush called Geraldine Ferraro the $4million thing that rhymes with rich./NT DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #442
Long time coming. Well deserved. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #38
I wish him the best and good health. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #41
Your the best Justin and thanks for the context elsewhere in the thread. Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #451
My pleasure. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #454
Hard to imagine it takes 69K posts before someone decides he doesn't belong. Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #464
peace my friend. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #469
+1 Quackers Jun 2015 #577
You are always welcome here. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #594
Why would you support phil89 Jun 2015 #1061
What should i do? Wish him bad? hrmjustin Jun 2015 #1063
Harsh n/t prayin4rain Jun 2015 #43
How ironic that his last post pintobean Jun 2015 #44
Good riddance- hope it will give those who chuckled along pause.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #47
Bummer BeyondGeography Jun 2015 #48
Good RetroLounge Jun 2015 #50
Unrec. Smarmie Doofus Jun 2015 #54
To what end? You think he can justify that? Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #62
Of course, he can email admin. They have occasionally reversed a ban. uppityperson Jun 2015 #82
that's not something one can explain/justify nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #107
whether I like him or not, this just makes me sad Marrah_G Jun 2015 #55
Indeed, totally agree. nt uppityperson Jun 2015 #370
We lost a very bright member. Keenly intelligent. Lost perspective due to intensity, I imagine. Gregorian Jun 2015 #57
+1000. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #85
+ a thousand thousand thousand. Octafish Jun 2015 #278
It will be much better.His hate begat hate. Clear as day. misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #569
Don't underestimate the effect of serious health issues and longterm medication use. blm Jun 2015 #333
He had become tremendously unpleasant of late. Codeine Jun 2015 #59
I agree he usually was one of the most level headed around here imo. Rex Jun 2015 #376
Of late? After the Newtown shooting - 2012 - he famously Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #470
And then when the Charlie Hebdo offices got shot up, he blamed the victims up one geek tragedy Jun 2015 #779
And then the numerous times he referred to the Atheists/Agnostic on DU Heddi Jun 2015 #825
He had brain surgery not long ago MissDeeds Jun 2015 #746
Ok... I'm Confused... WillyT Jun 2015 #66
The admins can probably see the name removed post Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #90
he was replying to an oft-returning troll. MIRT got them quickly. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2015 #112
Was he using those words mocking back in kind? nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #117
not sure of his intent, but yes, throwing the trolls' words back at them. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2015 #134
I don't agree with him doing it, but that should have been taken into polly7 Jun 2015 #154
Agree...Time Out not a banning. He has 80% Jury Approval and Star Membership KoKo Jun 2015 #191
Yes, especially giving consideration to his surgeries. polly7 Jun 2015 #202
yes. marym625 Jun 2015 #723
Making excuses because you had to "untwist " the words - as he suggested- to read c*nt? bettyellen Jun 2015 #116
Were You Here For The 2008 Primaries Between HRC And Barack Obama ??? WillyT Jun 2015 #163
A 5-2 hide reveals one of two things Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #181
So yeah- making loads of excuses for tossing out slurs.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #428
First, I HATE Zero-Tolerance Bullshit... I Prefer To Use Judgement... WillyT Jun 2015 #597
Folks are confusing the punishment with the crime. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #481
Banned for perceived use of foul pig Latin? PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #122
He knew. He'd seen the phrase before. Dr. Strange Jun 2015 #477
See post #98. JTFrog Jun 2015 #151
In the last few days, I'd finally hit my limit with his crap... MANative Jun 2015 #69
Agree. freshwest Jun 2015 #350
I also had enough of the disruptive behavior (and it was not because of supporting a candidate). Sancho Jun 2015 #738
seems harsh for the post edhopper Jun 2015 #71
that's the point, he thought he was being clever by pushing the boundaries. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #80
I still think edhopper Jun 2015 #111
he may get reinstated. probably after the primaries would be the soonest geek tragedy Jun 2015 #119
mine either edhopper Jun 2015 #485
The anti Hillary crap here is so over the top that I guess I'm sufrommich Jun 2015 #75
Self delete- with thanks to Autumn bettyellen Jun 2015 #83
I hope you remove this post now that you know you were mistaken and no host cheered him on. Autumn Jun 2015 #689
There was an over the top post a few months back on President Obama by a long termer, where the still_one Jun 2015 #288
+1 Jamaal510 Jun 2015 #523
Well said. And I agree completely with your post. Number23 Jun 2015 #814
this is one reason why mrs. unblock will never be a du member unblock Jun 2015 #79
Let TRP use the same word to describe a hated conservative female and it's cheered. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #114
Calling a woman, even a hated one, the c word here wouldn't survive. /NT DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #139
You're right about that but post a link to TRP saying it and it's all good. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #147
Pardon my ignorance but who is TRP? DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #172
The Rude Pundit. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #189
That's the truth... one_voice Jun 2015 #672
The British historically also had no problem using racial epithets for African Americans and Asians, still_one Jun 2015 #313
i think you mean epithets, not epitaphs. unblock Jun 2015 #327
Yes, thank you, I will correct it. You make a good point about my terminology also still_one Jun 2015 #630
Brits also call cigarettes f**s. NuclearDem Jun 2015 #354
um, i don't really have one.... unblock Jun 2015 #384
Wow. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #81
Not commenting on the poster one way or the other, but I've seen more offensive posts hughee99 Jun 2015 #89
You've seen posts that are more offensive that calling Hillary a **** survive a jury? Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #109
Grind your axe elsewhere. n/t hughee99 Jun 2015 #140
This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #143
"My opinion is the jury system is totally broken, and that affirms it. " hughee99 Jun 2015 #150
This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #162
I'm glad to be keeping you from being productive or perhaps annoying someone else hughee99 Jun 2015 #166
He did NOT use that word. To the naive like me I can see no connection to what he said. madfloridian Jun 2015 #549
That's not good. H2O Man Jun 2015 #92
+1 /nt RiverLover Jun 2015 #207
I agree. n/t ms liberty Jun 2015 #341
+ 1000 I truly like NYC SKP, he had a lot of thoughtful & wonderful OPs over the years. peacebird Jun 2015 #445
Me too. lonestarnot Jun 2015 #566
Agree... nenagh Jun 2015 #621
Remember what he posted after the Newtown shootings in 2012? CreekDog Jun 2015 #95
He called Charlie Hebdo racists and suggested they were responsible for the shooting. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #106
Indeed he did, in most starling terms. The poster was a conservative on many issues and on that Bluenorthwest Jun 2015 #543
Sadly, he got away with it too. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #659
His posts on Charlie Hebdo were absolutely disgusting melman Jun 2015 #896
missed that one. must have been stellar nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #113
he self-deleted the OP but copied it to the last post in the thread for posterity CreekDog Jun 2015 #178
Wow, how compassionate of the poster given the murder of twenty CHILDREN... Spazito Jun 2015 #794
That's what got me. In the past I have seen him Kingofalldems Jun 2015 #125
I think I may have to agree PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #174
So my memory didn't fail me. Kingofalldems Jun 2015 #224
He loved trolling feminists here and making it a hostile atmosphere bettyellen Jun 2015 #208
I think you are misremembering something. Kali Jun 2015 #837
I often wondered if he was more anti-Clinton than pro-Sanders. MADem Jun 2015 #342
I was thinking he was actually a conservative. Kingofalldems Jun 2015 #348
I think he was a conservative, too. His attitude towards guns MADem Jun 2015 #482
Being pro-gun does not make one a conservative. NutmegYankee Jun 2015 #852
There's pro gun, and there's pro gun NRA-style. nt MADem Jun 2015 #883
Some people have such hard feelings I doubt they see a difference. NutmegYankee Jun 2015 #891
I am not a gun banner or grabber. MADem Jun 2015 #925
I do. Sometimes it takes a while for a gun apologist to burn out here. onehandle Jun 2015 #137
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest Jun 2015 #301
Are people that are saying he didn't actually use the c-word for real? LexVegas Jun 2015 #99
I won't miss him. boston bean Jun 2015 #105
I have a rather low opinion of her but I would never use that word to describe her or any woman CBGLuthier Jun 2015 #110
I enjoyed reading his posts rock Jun 2015 #120
5-2 hide on the post that did him in. The 2 should be banned as well. nt onehandle Jun 2015 #121
+1 AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #126
You want to ban jurors whose opinions you don't like? Not surprised. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2015 #159
Be careful not to get caught in the "feeding frenzy". Just sayin'. nm rhett o rick Jun 2015 #171
So we *shouldn't* ban everyone who recommended one of his threads? Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #571
There seem to be a powerful feeling in self-righteousness. nm rhett o rick Jun 2015 #879
Absolutely! That explains some of what goes on at DU. Jim Lane Jun 2015 #1032
I don't know that it's the main value, but it's sure ok here, if you are on the side of rhett o rick Jun 2015 #1038
There are always some in these threads pintobean Jun 2015 #177
+1 Tarheel_Dem Jun 2015 #391
Nobody is going to get banned for voting on a jury. Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #535
Yup. Agschmid Jun 2015 #558
Cruised for a bruisin' Prism Jun 2015 #123
. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2015 #124
From this experience I've learned quite a lot more about the member & group which appalachiablue Jun 2015 #784
. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2015 #789
How bizarre to be banned over that bit of silliness. valerief Jun 2015 #128
C*nt is a "bit of silliness"? Nope- it's hateful and bigoted. bettyellen Jun 2015 #142
The word doesn't bother me in the least. But I didn't see the post. I thought the post valerief Jun 2015 #173
makenthe same argument for n****r and k**e- please proceed to educate us, Val! bettyellen Jun 2015 #192
Well, I don't know about the word knee, but as for the other word, black rappers valerief Jun 2015 #203
Lol, so you're okay with n*****r and will be when Bernie gets k*k* thrown at him.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #221
white males using the N-word and the C-word aren't taking the power out of the words CreekDog Jun 2015 #264
And his context was both clear and obvious to even the dullest halfwit. LanternWaste Jun 2015 #357
Every poster I have ever seen here defending racism or sexism ignores history and denies context.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #460
That poster got banned from a group here for using that word. JTFrog Jun 2015 #176
Got a link? pintobean Jun 2015 #187
You sure do seem to have a link fetish. JTFrog Jun 2015 #199
Thank you. It's only fair pintobean Jun 2015 #216
Wait. So that user got a hide but NYC_SKP got banned? bunnies Jun 2015 #402
NYC SKP was banned for his recent posting history. The use of that offensive word was just a pretext morningfog Jun 2015 #559
He has only one hide. bunnies Jun 2015 #575
Recent posting history = highly critical of Hillary. morningfog Jun 2015 #752
Thats certainly the way it seems to me. bunnies Jun 2015 #764
Why don't you take that up with Skinner in ATA? Here's a Bernie Supporter who thinks that's rubbish Cha Jun 2015 #1013
That's what it looks like. leveymg Jun 2015 #627
Interesting. There is not a zero tolerance ban on the word. morningfog Jun 2015 #519
Wow.. Cha Jun 2015 #1010
Good heavens, I'd forgotten all about that. I used it as a joke response to a valerief Jun 2015 #195
Still not funny dude. JTFrog Jun 2015 #204
Yeah, still not laughing Texasgal Jun 2015 #209
He's been off the reservation sharp_stick Jun 2015 #129
That's a little bigoted. polly7 Jun 2015 #148
A little careless putting it in print for people to read too. lonestarnot Jun 2015 #169
Very. I hope he/she will edit it. It's not pleasant to read. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #182
I am going to hope that be the case. Will check back. lonestarnot Jun 2015 #198
+1. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #472
It's apparently DU approved. lonestarnot Jun 2015 #572
Not for long. (I hope ... we'll see). nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #578
Well, apparently it's been alerted on and is fine to stay. polly7 Jun 2015 #584
Yeah jury said it was DU approved. lonestarnot Jun 2015 #596
My irony meter is broken nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #715
Thanks for letting us know. Your "pretty please" couldn't stop the grave-dancing. rhett o rick Jun 2015 #130
Thank you EarlG! nt William769 Jun 2015 #145
Good! Oh, and you sexist enablers are pathetic. MoonRiver Jun 2015 #146
Are you addressing me? cyberswede Jun 2015 #422
Not unless you're a sexist! MoonRiver Jun 2015 #468
I wasn't sure, since you used the word "you" cyberswede Jun 2015 #480
Sorry about that! MoonRiver Jun 2015 #532
I won't defend him. he's been skating the edge for a while Scootaloo Jun 2015 #718
Maybe it will be. MoonRiver Jun 2015 #737
If SKP is reading this thread LittleBlue Jun 2015 #149
To be fair... DU has set up a Sanders group where Sanders fans are totally protected. Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #156
I hate the protected group system too LittleBlue Jun 2015 #170
probably a troll. mopinko Jun 2015 #643
Not true. Had I seen the term and recognized it for what it is--I would have alerted a DU jury. merrily Jun 2015 #721
sadly true glinda Jun 2015 #179
I don't see how it's going to work. DU is essentially anti-Hillary LittleBlue Jun 2015 #200
Actually many Hillary supporting DUers may come back OKNancy Jun 2015 #324
Perhaps the admin has decided to drop the Underground part. zeemike Jun 2015 #651
That is how I see it LittleBlue Jun 2015 #690
DU won't see a mass migration when Bernie loses the primary Godhumor Jun 2015 #210
DU was heavily in favor of Obama by the middle of 2008 LittleBlue Jun 2015 #226
Maybe, but attitudes toward Republicans won't change, either. merrily Jun 2015 #729
I think that statements like this is what is glinda Jun 2015 #307
Maybe that is DU's fait. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #926
Locking. TOS does not specify whether calling out DUers applies to current or former members. randome Jun 2015 #152
You really do want me to post that gif, don't you? freshwest Jun 2015 #312
Too bad. I hope he/she is allowed to return. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2015 #157
A real loss. Octafish Jun 2015 #160
If a female candidate for the nomination can't be called a C-word on DU, what??? CreekDog Jun 2015 #260
The banned member is the one that didn't hold up to scrutiny. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #316
over 68,000 posts and service as a moderator. merrily Jun 2015 #161
I so much agree. madfloridian Jun 2015 #611
That is too bad...I really liked him. SoapBox Jun 2015 #164
The first of many to come nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #175
Even though I tend to disagree with him more than I agree with him... MohRokTah Jun 2015 #180
He's been on my ignore list for years. El Supremo Jun 2015 #183
I'm going to miss him and had him on ignore for over a year olddots Jun 2015 #184
Calling Clinton the C word is despicable. herding cats Jun 2015 #188
good ann--- Jun 2015 #190
I have nothing to lose, so I'm going to say it. The banning was biased. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #194
I won't try to convince you... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #263
There is nothing to convince me of. We are agreed on the main points. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #277
I would have given him a thirty day ban and not a permanent one. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #289
Agreed m' Dear. Puglover Jun 2015 #270
or hey, the one talking about a black man getting shot in the back, polly7 Jun 2015 #283
Yep. Absurd. cliffordu Jun 2015 #707
That is too bad. I like SKP. Hope to see him back. raouldukelives Jun 2015 #196
You all know what George Carlin would say about censorship. randys1 Jun 2015 #197
OFFS. NuclearDem Jun 2015 #254
I wonder what can be done about trolls who follow posters around and make smart ass randys1 Jun 2015 #262
I demand the right to call Hillary a c*! George Carlin! PC police! NuclearDem Jun 2015 #303
Nothing, it would seem. Been going on for a long time. randys1 Jun 2015 #309
The George Carlin who said this about women with eating disorders: geek tragedy Jun 2015 #319
The man was a genius, and he was not politically correct. His standards were quite high randys1 Jun 2015 #421
"incorrect word" is not an accurate way of describing geek tragedy Jun 2015 #432
Complete and total nonsense. randys1 Jun 2015 #441
apologies for using an "incorrect word" nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #443
There are consequences to the words we use, for me, you, and the late George Carlin... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #351
No, there are not consequences for everybody. madfloridian Jun 2015 #500
He's not silenced, and he may continue to use that word indiscriminately should he so choose. LanternWaste Jun 2015 #394
I agree about censorship, and second your appeal to Admin to grant clemency leveymg Jun 2015 #601
This message was self-deleted by its author brentspeak Jun 2015 #201
What about the Rude Pundit? jalan48 Jun 2015 #205
The Rude Pundit is not a member and does not post here. bluedigger Jun 2015 #295
Thanks for the clarification. jalan48 Jun 2015 #306
The word does not belong here. Anyone copying and pasting can blank out letters, just as they would merrily Jun 2015 #792
I assumed meegbear = The Rude Pundit. merrily Jun 2015 #822
I consider that a very sad thing. madfloridian Jun 2015 #211
I can see why that post was too much... Sancho Jun 2015 #220
Ugh. KamaAina Jun 2015 #222
I am sorry to see that question everything Jun 2015 #227
Didn't always agree with him (who does?) but I'll miss him. Throd Jun 2015 #229
Permanent ban too harsh IMO. n/t moondust Jun 2015 #231
What in the bloody HELL was he thinking? Puglover Jun 2015 #236
Agreed, I hope he will be allowed back. He was a long time member and it's sad to see this Autumn Jun 2015 #696
He disrupted constantly...and poorly. MADem Jun 2015 #238
I "don't have a dog in this hunt" and don't think I've run across this guy before, but.... George II Jun 2015 #245
That is NOT what the post said. Be honest. madfloridian Jun 2015 #246
He was a stealth troll. But to each his own I suppose. nt boston bean Jun 2015 #249
It was crystal clear what he was doing, and yes he was calling her that name geek tragedy Jun 2015 #273
had him pegged as a shitbag after he posted the gun porn thread in GD after the Newtown shooting KG Jun 2015 #253
I will miss NYC_SKP. We did not always agree, but I think that banning him for making a joke JDPriestly Jun 2015 #258
So, he tried to slip in a cheap shot Wash. state Desk Jet Jun 2015 #266
BS ban! Cosmic Kitten Jun 2015 #267
It can be tough when the realization hits a person for the first time LanternWaste Jun 2015 #406
Wow a hide would have been enough dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #269
I agree. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #274
Interesting double standard nichomachus Jun 2015 #272
No, false equivalency on your part. "Dick" is in no way in the same category geek tragedy Jun 2015 #276
Nonsense nichomachus Jun 2015 #286
It's not fully equivalent for anyone who actually speaks American English geek tragedy Jun 2015 #294
Exactly. deurbano Jun 2015 #353
^^This^^ Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #392
YES, it is. polly7 Jun 2015 #296
Different rules for different people. bunnies Jun 2015 #413
A little surprised at the support this member recieves here. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #279
Sanders has attracted a lot of people who just plain hate Hillary Clinton. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #287
I agree with you one hundred percent that it reflects on Sanders in no way. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #346
It's a way of separating the true Bernie supporters vs the hatewagon crowd nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #358
His posts were becoming so vitriolic and rabid that I'm not surprised by this outcome. Metric System Jun 2015 #780
very appropriate - absolutely no need for that here DrDan Jun 2015 #282
I don't know if an outright banning is warranted. Xyzse Jun 2015 #291
several people.... quickesst Jun 2015 #292
Wow, he should have been more creative in his cursing. backscatter712 Jun 2015 #300
That was a dumb and offensive thing to write. I wonder, though, if his banning was morningfog Jun 2015 #304
SKP's demeanor changed. It wasn't just that we supported different candidates, it was personal. Tarheel_Dem Jun 2015 #311
According to posters upthread, he was having serious health issues and polly7 Jun 2015 #318
That may be a plausible explanation. However, if that's the case, perhaps this isn't the place for Tarheel_Dem Jun 2015 #323
He screwed up. polly7 Jun 2015 #337
That's too bad, but I don't feel too sorry for him Jack Rabbit Jun 2015 #314
Honestly... Bobbie Jo Jun 2015 #315
Please be clearer. I'd appreciate it. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #329
My post was clear Bobbie Jo Jun 2015 #361
I have my opinion. Your post was a threat. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #364
Ok Bobbie Jo Jun 2015 #483
I think she is saying that as the primary season heats up BainsBane Jun 2015 #765
I was part of the jury yesterday Takket Jun 2015 #320
Were you able to see the post he was replying to? dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #363
no. i tried to read it, but it was deleted. Takket Jun 2015 #371
So the jury could not see the post he was replying to dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #388
here you go. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #390
Thanks dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #418
It would not surprise me if many of us "Block Members" on this list to be banned Purveyor Jun 2015 #325
Are you suggesting that people on that list are likely to call Clinton the c-word? geek tragedy Jun 2015 #331
I never knew until now, given his posts, that he was part of the HRC group nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #335
He wasn't part of the HRC group, he was BANNED from it. nt MADem Jun 2015 #545
Thanks for the clarification nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #556
The Bernie Sanders Group is a little over a month old William769 Jun 2015 #360
He asked me to ban him. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #374
I know he did. William769 Jun 2015 #381
My pleasure. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #386
You literally asked me to ban you so don't act like your a martyr. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #369
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Purveyor Jun 2015 #389
Now if we could just get you to respond to your innuendo's. William769 Jun 2015 #395
LOL. Ironic. polly7 Jun 2015 #398
How so? hrmjustin Jun 2015 #400
Oh, the poster I responded to, who isn't you ...... knows very well. polly7 Jun 2015 #410
Well the poster he was responded to literally asked me to ban him so i did. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #412
Well that's good. polly7 Jun 2015 #419
i mention it because he posted this; hrmjustin Jun 2015 #425
Yeah ok whatever. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #427
Yeah well that is why Bill and i were responding to him. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #430
Great! polly7 Jun 2015 #434
but i asked you how so. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #438
And I told you it had nothing to do with you. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #439
oh i see you can't back it up. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #444
Oh do you now?? polly7 Jun 2015 #450
Of course. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #452
Of course. Thanks. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #456
We won Justin. Just move on. William769 Jun 2015 #487
LOL. polly7 Jun 2015 #512
Oh my lord. Puglover Jun 2015 #609
I see cirickets is all we are going to get. Typical William769 Jun 2015 #403
VERY! polly7 Jun 2015 #407
OMG! It took him all of 3 minutes to make a reply so lets haul out the {{{crickets}}} Purveyor Jun 2015 #417
True, and now that you have seen it, still crickets. William769 Jun 2015 #423
................. polly7 Jun 2015 #431
Nothing worthy of responding to. I merily speculated the future here at DU. eom Purveyor Jun 2015 #404
Right... William769 Jun 2015 #409
Wow, I had no idea this was happening! haikugal Jun 2015 #686
A good banning MuseRider Jun 2015 #326
I support this banning tammywammy Jun 2015 #334
That's too bad. I like(d) SKP, and he added a lot to DU over the years petronius Jun 2015 #336
Thank you, EarlG. SunSeeker Jun 2015 #345
Not to forget- digonswine Jun 2015 #795
Just for the record this is what the poster he was responding to said. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #347
thanks for that, Justin Kali Jun 2015 #647
transparency is good. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #654
Is it possible that he didnt even know what "cunning stunt" meant? bunnies Jun 2015 #703
I can't speak to that but i can tell you i knew what it meant. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #708
Guess Im just behind the lingo times as usual. bunnies Jun 2015 #712
People make mistakes. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #719
Thank you for posting this information. In_The_Wind Jun 2015 #800
Well that makes the ban look even more ridiculous Egnever Jun 2015 #919
Okay, I think I caught up to what happened… stupid decision to provoke privileges, IYAM MrMickeysMom Jun 2015 #953
The crazy season (primaries) always claims a member or two it seems. mmonk Jun 2015 #349
More like egg shells nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #356
Most likely. mmonk Jun 2015 #749
That's kind of shocking. Blue_In_AK Jun 2015 #352
Agree. madfloridian Jun 2015 #373
he became a target of at least two, largely non-overlapping, gangs of harassers carolinayellowdog Jun 2015 #355
Harsh punishment for one occurrence. AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #359
I am very upset about it. So angry I may have to take a break or risk banning. madfloridian Jun 2015 #367
Me too, mad. AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #380
Same here MissDeeds Jun 2015 #790
+1000. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #383
+1 darkangel218 Jun 2015 #449
+100000000 peacebird Jun 2015 #455
...^ that 840high Jun 2015 #461
I agree: hide the post, give a 'time-out' when enough hides accrue, but I petronius Jun 2015 #507
I kind of remember from the old days.... Renew Deal Jun 2015 #564
I agree. Blue_In_AK Jun 2015 #673
I agree. I could live with a hide, even suspension. But a ban is over the top... Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #773
Hiding the post would have been enough. ozone_man Jun 2015 #365
Sid is in timeout and NYC_SKIP is banned...DU is in upside down world. Rex Jun 2015 #366
I wouldn't give either one of the two that title... so I'm not sure which is which. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #372
I like both for different reasons. We all stir at times. Rex Jun 2015 #382
I don't think it's about disrespecting the candidates tammywammy Jun 2015 #393
I've seen that word used here and not get a hide or the person banned Rex Jun 2015 #414
message sent...... Don't call Hillary a c*nt... seems simple enough, wouldn't you say? boston bean Jun 2015 #446
Yes I would. Rex Jun 2015 #465
And yet POS used car salesman is just fine Egnever Jun 2015 #922
I alerterd when I saw it used on Plain or Bachman because it's not okay against any woman. bettyellen Jun 2015 #484
Good! I alert if I see it and a few other choice words. Rex Jun 2015 #492
This message was self-deleted by its author closeupready Jun 2015 #551
seabeyond is on summer vacation too Renew Deal Jun 2015 #574
Primary season is seeing a lot of casualties from all over the DU spectrum. Rex Jun 2015 #783
That's going to be a long one pintobean Jun 2015 #853
I know. Renew Deal Jun 2015 #856
Sad to see a long timer go mvd Jun 2015 #375
Whew shenmue Jun 2015 #387
Sanders & Clinton threads quickly come and go. But a thread about a banned DUer garners 400 replies. randome Jun 2015 #396
Think that is bad, try wasting time by posting actual news articles and see how lonely that is. eom Purveyor Jun 2015 #424
And look at the speed! Over 500 replies already! randome Jun 2015 #509
We like to talk about ourselves. neverforget Jun 2015 #743
I'm sorry to hear that. 840high Jun 2015 #408
Banning a long time Du'er who has contributed a lot here doesn't seem liberal to me The Straight Story Jun 2015 #415
I'm happy to exclude misogynistic speech from the big tent. boston bean Jun 2015 #475
Du is a witch hunt anymore The Straight Story Jun 2015 #493
I don't see someone calling a woman a c*nt as a progressive attribute. boston bean Jun 2015 #505
Ah I see, one post out of thousands and you latch onto that one The Straight Story Jun 2015 #590
I see you disagree. You can educate yourself if you want. boston bean Jun 2015 #635
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #619
I see you disagree. You can educate yourself if you want. boston bean Jun 2015 #623
Well, you'll always have Discussionist nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #537
Witch hunting is a lesser issue that people alerting on posters who hurt their feelings Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #652
The Big Tent can do without misogyny and NRA viewpoints. nt MADem Jun 2015 #498
Nice try. The Straight Story Jun 2015 #595
It wasn't a 'try' -- if you think c- word name-calling is cool, MADem Jun 2015 #610
Another nice try - you know I didn't say that. If you think I did - back it up :) The Straight Story Jun 2015 #629
Stop endorsing or excusing misogyny then...because that is what you are doing MADem Jun 2015 #675
And there you are, doing it again - same technique The Straight Story Jun 2015 #778
You have the power. If you don't want to be mistaken MADem Jun 2015 #892
A lot of cheering going on at someone's demise Exilednight Jun 2015 #429
Did he pass away? LordGlenconner Jun 2015 #503
You should be less sure. He recently had brain surgery. (nt) jeff47 Jun 2015 #567
I suspect you ghost through here chknltl Jun 2015 #433
NYC - My best to you JustAnotherGen Jun 2015 #436
That's a real shame G_j Jun 2015 #447
Grave-dancing does not become us, either. Orsino Jun 2015 #453
permanent ban or a time out for a day or two? Sunlei Jun 2015 #459
Perm. nt LittleBlue Jun 2015 #466
guess he is allowed to start fresh with a new name. really was a very disrespectful remark. Sunlei Jun 2015 #516
By the way, that's not easy Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #529
strip the post count would be suitable punishment. Sunlei Jun 2015 #570
"You know, this would be a good time for Kucinich and other progressives to rally around Obama". Zorra Jun 2015 #473
I often disagree with NYC_SKP; I agree with the ban hammer here; but I'd also support a 2nd chance Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #479
I feel sad about this BainsBane Jun 2015 #486
I am very sad. Way too many are gloating over it. That's even worse. madfloridian Jun 2015 #494
That's irrational. Agschmid Jun 2015 #534
perhaps post on admin page and suggest a week or two ban for that type of comment Sunlei Jun 2015 #536
Yup, I keep most of my substantive stuff nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #829
the really unfortunate thing is that the post he was replying to was removed. mopinko Jun 2015 #490
One of the good guys for sure. ileus Jun 2015 #501
I have gone and read the link. I think NYC SKP got a bum deal. If I wre to refer to a cunning stunt peacebird Jun 2015 #502
did you miss the part where he talked about it being a tongue-twister geek tragedy Jun 2015 #531
Until this thread I had never heard that cunning stunt was code for anything. I still say its peacebird Jun 2015 #550
he had been getting increasingly unhinged and deranged towards Clinton. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #554
I didn't know about "See you next Tuesday" until I relayed a bizarre story to a coworker bettyellen Jun 2015 #565
Nevermind... The googles told me.......Ok, now I have to ask. What does 'see you next Tuesday' mean? peacebird Jun 2015 #576
Oops. Iggo Jun 2015 #603
The See you = CU! Wasn't obvious to me, and puzzling because I said I'd never be back! bettyellen Jun 2015 #607
See you next Tuesday = C U Next Tuesday geek tragedy Jun 2015 #618
The things I learn here. haikugal Jun 2015 #761
It's sad, but justified. SKP morphed into rabidness as soon as HRC entered the race. Hekate Jun 2015 #513
Definitely wouldn't have been my choice BainsBane Jun 2015 #528
I didn't know about the surgery. It's possible.... Hekate Jun 2015 #716
It was surgery on his brain, I believe BainsBane Jun 2015 #753
wow Kali Jun 2015 #522
Wow d_b Jun 2015 #524
I'm sorry to hear that. Voice for Peace Jun 2015 #526
Lewis and Clark vs Bill and Ted snooper2 Jun 2015 #530
So who the hell is going to continually admonish me for having a loud motorcycle now? Glassunion Jun 2015 #541
It's about time. murielm99 Jun 2015 #542
He seemed like a genuinely good guy. peecoolyour Jun 2015 #546
Let this be a lesson to us all. Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #547
The idea that NYC_SKP could get banned is absurd Renew Deal Jun 2015 #548
I'm not going to second guess the ban, but only say... hlthe2b Jun 2015 #561
It's a part of primary season that I had forgotten about. Renew Deal Jun 2015 #583
This thread seems like a celebration. I think that is horrible. madfloridian Jun 2015 #562
Why would you be banned? Agschmid Jun 2015 #593
Why not? madfloridian Jun 2015 #600
Nope I don't think so. Agschmid Jun 2015 #602
SKP got banned for half-cleverly calling Hillary Clinton the c-word in exactly the same geek tragedy Jun 2015 #612
Yup. Agschmid Jun 2015 #616
And when you're ripping of Drudge, you've hit some kind of low in trolling nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #620
Be civil when you post, don't post insults or nasty language. It isn't that difficult. uppityperson Jun 2015 #645
You seem unaware I have done that. madfloridian Jun 2015 #781
I was speaking in general terms, not aimed at what you do or don't do. uppityperson Jun 2015 #978
Not all of Bernie's supporters are angry Andy823 Jun 2015 #777
To quote my favorite president "this is a teachable moment." DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #568
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #579
One thing I Jamaal510 Jun 2015 #582
ambivalence and complexity are human, whereas lockstep ideological solidarity seems... carolinayellowdog Jun 2015 #632
I think he hated the racism that the Clintons directed toward Obama in 2008 tularetom Jun 2015 #648
"It's" is NOT the same as "She's" cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #585
This is exactly like Drudge calling Cindy Sheehan's arrest a "cunning stunt" geek tragedy Jun 2015 #598
If I disagree, is that hate speech, and/or misogyny as well? cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #649
No, it just means you condone that hate speech geek tragedy Jun 2015 #656
I've seen others with one foot on a banana peel ... lpbk2713 Jun 2015 #587
I'm sorry to hear this LadyHawkAZ Jun 2015 #608
:o PeaceNikki Jun 2015 #614
Lotta crocodile tears being shed for ol' NYC_SKP by supporters of She Who Must Be Obeyed tularetom Jun 2015 #624
Wait, you admit that word provoked you to violence but think it's perfectly geek tragedy Jun 2015 #642
Oh get off your high horse! polly7 Jun 2015 #658
And if I claim honkey isn't as bad as the n word BainsBane Jun 2015 #834
Claim whatever you like. I wasn't responding to you. polly7 Jun 2015 #849
YOU know and I know- digonswine Jun 2015 #909
Exactly right. polly7 Jun 2015 #918
Then what you know is just wrong- digonswine Jun 2015 #928
Nah ..... maybe what you know is 'wrong'. polly7 Jun 2015 #951
Your experiences are yours- digonswine Jun 2015 #961
My experiences are mine. Right on. Equality for 'all', or don't pretend. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #964
Right- digonswine Jun 2015 #969
Your experiences seem to be the unhappy ones. polly7 Jun 2015 #972
#1 It was my daughter, dude, what would you do? tularetom Jun 2015 #671
#1 I think it's unacceptable to call any woman that. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #681
Yup. Agschmid Jun 2015 #693
There's so much wrong in that post tularetom Jun 2015 #742
I think he lost the plot due to his intense hatred of Clinton, to the point geek tragedy Jun 2015 #768
Actually prick dick and c are in the same zip code nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #722
no, as a man I can tell you that virtually no man views "prick" and "dick" geek tragedy Jun 2015 #726
You speak for yourself. polly7 Jun 2015 #730
Your brothers have seriously violent anger issues and need help n/t kcr Jun 2015 #1052
And as a woman I don't care nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #736
there's nothing substantive about that word and is various euphemisms geek tragedy Jun 2015 #741
Here is the thing nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #745
Bottom line, calling Hillary Clinton a c*unt will get one the banhammer. boston bean Jun 2015 #755
Bottom line we will not enforce the rules nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #759
I don't know. I look at what is in question here, and I am not laughing. nt boston bean Jun 2015 #762
So am I. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #772
the anti-semitism should be dealt with much more harshly than it has geek tragedy Jun 2015 #760
The only reason I came back nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #767
You are correct- digonswine Jun 2015 #911
None of those words is shorthand for prostitute. n/t Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #921
Actually yes, according to the dictionary nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #937
Nowhere in your link does it get defined as prostitute. Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #944
As I said, they danced around it nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #974
Yes, but it doesn't mean "prostitute" zappaman Jun 2015 #977
Well slut and prostitue are synonyms. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #982
What? zappaman Jun 2015 #985
Old college joke nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #986
Well this certainly doesn't sound like him. cliffordu Jun 2015 #655
Well then, shame on Grantcart. In_The_Wind Jun 2015 #674
Fuck YEAH! In any event, cliffordu Jun 2015 #701
What does Grantcart have to do with Earl G banning NYC-SKP? Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #687
One has absolutely nothing to do with the other. cliffordu Jun 2015 #700
How the hell do you make a double entendre out of monkey brains? rug Jun 2015 #884
Well, first you get this monkey, see..... cliffordu Jun 2015 #998
Good. riversedge Jun 2015 #667
wow. forever? Liberal_in_LA Jun 2015 #668
The Devil made me do it. kentuck Jun 2015 #669
I was starting to wonder Flying Squirrel Jun 2015 #677
This message was self-deleted by its author Capt. Obvious Jun 2015 #682
I am guessing there is no way we can keep the thread from getting nasty. el_bryanto Jun 2015 #692
night shift hasn't even signed on yet. nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #697
...silence... MineralMan Jun 2015 #705
The Pain of Loving You kentuck Jun 2015 #720
no censorship is good censorship captainarizona Jun 2015 #724
Then maybe DU isn't for you. Cause pinned right at the top of boston bean Jun 2015 #744
Did you not read the Terms of Service when you signed up? "By registering a Democratic Underground uppityperson Jun 2015 #756
NYC_SKP in his own words: Bluenorthwest Jun 2015 #727
Yeah, that was pretty amazing, but I guess it's a lot easier to blame the people geek tragedy Jun 2015 #774
Sad. I liked his passion Android3.14 Jun 2015 #747
Oh I'm so sad. Stupid mistake. applegrove Jun 2015 #757
Unrecommended to the max. Enthusiast Jun 2015 #758
Interesting Lithos Jun 2015 #766
Too bad...he was making me nuts lately joeybee12 Jun 2015 #769
There's no place for that word used that way here. As much as I enjoy 90% of NYC, he had to know.... marble falls Jun 2015 #775
It is sad to think that some people think that the "C" word is acceptable as honest critique Agnosticsherbet Jun 2015 #786
agree - I thought DU was better than that DrDan Jun 2015 #805
This thread is a huge eye opener. KMOD Jun 2015 #791
I fail to see how calling any particular woman ANY name ... is derogatory to all women ... baffled brett_jv Jun 2015 #796
I think there should be boundaries and racist and sexist and homophobic name calling should be one uponit7771 Jun 2015 #806
He is just the latest in a long line of posters here that get sucked into GD and start taking Number23 Jun 2015 #797
Don't agree with the banning. HornBuckler Jun 2015 #802
Great idea. I'll do similar. MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 #808
Done and done. HornBuckler Jun 2015 #820
If it makes you feel any better, Omaha Steve set that up. merrily Jun 2015 #843
Omaha Steve is A-OK in my book. Glad to help! nt. HornBuckler Jun 2015 #859
I expect you'll be short that $50 soon. nt MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 #850
I'm in for another $20. Good idea, indeed. eom Purveyor Jun 2015 #861
If you paid attention to this poster's imput after Sandy Hook, you'd be wondering who the "real" KittyWampus Jun 2015 #810
So, you're saying he had a sock puppet to respond to his own post? progressoid Jun 2015 #976
Well buh bye we can do it Jun 2015 #812
You are mistaken, he called no one any such thing, very dishonest of you, unbelievably so in fact. Dragonfli Jun 2015 #815
... Cleita Jun 2015 #841
this thread has 800+ replies.... mike_c Jun 2015 #826
A 7 year member given the death penalty over one post. 99Forever Jun 2015 #827
I agree with you. HornBuckler Jun 2015 #833
I agree darkangel218 Jun 2015 #836
That's a shame he said that steve2470 Jun 2015 #828
Agreed! helpful and freindly to me as well . The hostility toward orpupilofnature57 Jun 2015 #831
One can say the same thing about how HRC supporters are treated here. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #870
I see you attacked numerous times. zappaman Jun 2015 #904
If it was against warren there woukd be a huge outcry here. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #916
NYC_SKP Has been an informative ,valuable, source, this is orpupilofnature57 Jun 2015 #830
Gunner down! alcibiades_mystery Jun 2015 #839
LOL. Downtown Hound Jun 2015 #854
I wonder if all his defenders would be defending him if it was about Warren? zappaman Jun 2015 #842
I don't know about all of them Kali Jun 2015 #941
I volunteered for Warren's campaign in 2012, so here's my answer. Jim Lane Jun 2015 #1047
I alerted on this OP as being Meta. The hosts are locking all the other threads about NYC_SKP darkangel218 Jun 2015 #844
Which goes to the issue at heart nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #858
except that you often claim ANY criticism or disagreement as a personal attack Kali Jun 2015 #915
Not any nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #930
my pals? see who does the snide remarks? Kali Jun 2015 #939
Yes your pals nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #947
such a fine example of what I was talking about Kali Jun 2015 #949
LMAO, but expected nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #950
Oh and one more thing Kali nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #933
about the only thing you are a victim of Kali Jun 2015 #955
For the rest of the class nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #959
It seems those other posts were locked for complaining, per Skinner's pinned thread, top of forum uppityperson Jun 2015 #864
some meta is allowed Kali Jun 2015 #913
:-) pintobean Jun 2015 #943
Bad decision IMO. DanTex Jun 2015 #845
That sux. I know he stepped over the line... HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #848
He was trying to be funny, not clever fadedrose Jun 2015 #851
Everyone who wants NYC_SKP back, please message the Administrators darkangel218 Jun 2015 #865
Its a civil community, first and foremost!!!! nt William769 Jun 2015 #872
A poster messes up in ONE post, and you think he should be permanently banned???? darkangel218 Jun 2015 #875
I want him back. 840high Jun 2015 #885
I find this news as disturbing as I find it disheartening. 2banon Jun 2015 #877
....x10 840high Jun 2015 #888
+1 hifiguy Jun 2015 #897
I hate seeing longtime decent folks driven off by a simple disagreement... Blue_Tires Jun 2015 #878
Sad to see an old timer go. Owl Jun 2015 #882
me too Liberal_in_LA Jun 2015 #946
Well all other posts now about this are locked. This one just keeps on going. madfloridian Jun 2015 #893
Only the celebratory post still going. madfloridian Jun 2015 #898
More celebratory threads were started. merrily Jun 2015 #990
That sucks. Captain Stern Jun 2015 #900
This has been a very revealing thread. merrily Jun 2015 #901
revealing of the costs and risks of investing great time and energy in an online forum carolinayellowdog Jun 2015 #948
902 ileus Jun 2015 #902
Well deserved. HERVEPA Jun 2015 #907
A bullshit, biased decision. This sort of shit is the reason I stopped donating. /nt Marr Jun 2015 #912
I won't be donating again either. polly7 Jun 2015 #924
Likewise. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #1037
This sort of response might encourage me to donate again. MADem Jun 2015 #936
Huh? polly7 Jun 2015 #954
Way to misinterpret my intention... MADem Jun 2015 #960
K. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #965
I don't care what you do. /nt Marr Jun 2015 #1041
The hide was well-deserved. The ban was not. Terra Alta Jun 2015 #914
Unfortunate ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2015 #917
This banning stuff seems way over the top Depaysement Jun 2015 #923
Some history on DU with the C word Renew Deal Jun 2015 #931
Ed Schultz was only off the air for a few days for a bad word Omaha Steve Jun 2015 #938
This is going to be a long hot primary season. nt BumRushDaShow Jun 2015 #940
I'm sorry to see him banned because I like him, Beacool Jun 2015 #945
48 to go Renew Deal Jun 2015 #952
here is where the credibilty wears DonCoquixote Jun 2015 #958
C'mon, git to 1000 in a day, git dere boy, git it. AngryAmish Jun 2015 #962
Wow GP6971 Jun 2015 #963
Has to be close Renew Deal Jun 2015 #968
C'mon! We can hit 1000 posts today! We love to talk about ourselves neverforget Jun 2015 #967
1000 replies within 12 hours -- almost. aikoaiko Jun 2015 #970
Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #975
Joe polly7 Jun 2015 #979
Going for 1,000. The topics really hit a nerve here, but it was not "just one post".... Hekate Jun 2015 #984
So EarlG was fibbing in his ban message? ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #994
Well said. n/t JTFrog Jun 2015 #995
This is going to be an awesome place to post Aerows Jun 2015 #1007
K & R GP6971 Jun 2015 #987
Bad form, DU. MelungeonWoman Jun 2015 #989
Oh no, not NYC, he is a good person! akbacchus_BC Jun 2015 #991
For post 999, here's a brief exchange between NYC_SKP and EarlG from Sept '13 Electric Monk Jun 2015 #999
and, Skinner.. still being "clever" Cha Jun 2015 #1009
While we're reminiscing about 2013 pintobean Jun 2015 #1025
Oh, you want to go there? Ok. Oh, and you cropped out the best part. Electric Monk Jun 2015 #1045
The exchange was hilarious. pintobean Jun 2015 #1046
1000! Prism Jun 2015 #1000
Congratulations Prism! lovemydog Jun 2015 #1003
This sounds suspiciously like the office version! Prism Jun 2015 #1004
It's almost exactly the same! lovemydog Jun 2015 #1005
10001 post! lovemydog Jun 2015 #1001
Not 10001 yet, got 9000 to go first. JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #1012
Oops! lovemydog Jun 2015 #1083
No. Just. No. raven mad Jun 2015 #1014
We love and we miss you buddy....one of the true good guys. ileus Jun 2015 #1016
I'm sure I've disagreed with him a time or two davidpdx Jun 2015 #1021
He snarked me recently. Want me to throw him some red meat? WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jun 2015 #1022
I have nothing to contribute to this thread Sanity Claws Jun 2015 #1026
What's to stop a banned member from cleaning their cookies and B Calm Jun 2015 #1030
nothing, but if he's banned by IP address, he has to get a lot more inventive than that nt steve2470 Jun 2015 #1070
To be honest ... lpbk2713 Jun 2015 #1040
I am sorry but He should have been banned after these posts: LostOne4Ever Jun 2015 #1044
Not to mention his nasty OP after Sandy Hook. Jamastiene Jun 2015 #1048
Exactly! Only reason I didn't mention SH is because I was not a part of DU then (nt) LostOne4Ever Jun 2015 #1050
None of his defenders will even attempt to address the facts of those Hebdo or Sandy Hook posts Bluenorthwest Jun 2015 #1068
What a pantload Egnever Jun 2015 #1074
I read your whole post and -none Jun 2015 #1075
It is victim blaming. Victim blaming people who were brutally murdered. n/t LostOne4Ever Jun 2015 #1084
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYC_SKP has been banned»Reply #688