Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gawker:Barack Obama’s Bullshit Gay Marriage Announcement (still says its up to each state to decide) [View all]Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
137 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gawker:Barack Obama’s Bullshit Gay Marriage Announcement (still says its up to each state to decide) [View all]
stockholmer
May 2012
OP
There is some legal analysis that says this is bullshit and it's been posted here a
Pirate Smile
May 2012
#2
He gave his personal opinion...that is all. But that is what we were screaming for, wasn't it?
nanabugg
May 2012
#105
There will NEVER be another Democratic nominee for president that opposes marriage equality
FarLeftFist
May 2012
#33
The ODSers can't handle the good news. They have to find something to hate Obama for.
Liberal_Stalwart71
May 2012
#7
So, you are okay with the NC vote. Because Obama is. He supports states rights.
Luminous Animal
May 2012
#17
splendid strawman! you have vanquished it skillfully... and while you're at it, you
dionysus
May 2012
#24
Its really a Supreme Court issue. Thats how interracial marriage bans were ended and that how...
phleshdef
May 2012
#14
Oh we all knew this crap was coming. There are people who will attack Obama
NYC Liberal
May 2012
#11
Romney was governor of one of the most liberal if not the most liberal state in the country.
EOTE
May 2012
#41
And you do think that Obama is "a monster who bombed the shit out of another country"?...nt
SidDithers
May 2012
#51
He certainly bombed the shit out of another country, killing many innocent civilians in the process.
EOTE
May 2012
#53
There's a wide range to the estimates and bear in mind that Nixon was president for only a fraction
EOTE
May 2012
#68
Are You Seriously Claiming Only 50.000 People Were Killed In Viet Nam, Sir?
The Magistrate
May 2012
#70
No, Sir: It is An Accurate Claim, And You Would Do Well To Accept The Fact
The Magistrate
May 2012
#77
How many of those 10,000+ civilian deaths would have occured had we not been there?
EOTE
May 2012
#78
Not True, Sir: The Place Was In Civil War In 2001, And Local Festivities Will Resume On Our Leaving
The Magistrate
May 2012
#79
So you think the bulk of those deaths would have still occurred had we not been there?
EOTE
May 2012
#80
You Have Made Very Clear, Sir, What Your Opinion Is Worth: As Little As The Extent Of Your Knowledge
The Magistrate
May 2012
#81
Yes, because the poster I was responding to said that Nixon was a monster who bombed other countries
EOTE
May 2012
#58
Oh us ungrateful gays who won't celebrate "states rights" discrimination.
Luminous Animal
May 2012
#20