I said it above: those among the new origins of immigrants who have imported with them the belief in religious violence of their cultures of origin.

Take the often well educated muslims of Iranian origin who fled the Khomeini revolution: they are less likely to adhere to religious fundamentalism.

But among the often poor and uneducated refugees of Somali origin resettled in the Detroit region, there are reports of fundamentalism, including a belief in the use of violence in the case of blasphemy.

And "Refraining from insulting another's religious beliefs" is not a "self-imposed restrain from being offensive just for the sake of being so", it can be cowardice. As the BBC demonstrated by refraining from showing the Charlie Hebdo caricatures to the audience of a show even after having asked the audience whether they wanted the cartoons to be shown to illustrate and clarify the debate.

We are not talking about pamela Geller here, we are talking about a TV show which was debating free speech vs religion. The audience ask to see the cartoons, it was relevant to the discussion, the channel management had pre-written a letter barring the presentation of the cartoons.

That is the creeping self imposed censorship that is rising.

That is what I am seething against.