Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
182. Not conflating them at all
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 01:08 AM
Apr 2015

- we're screwed if we pout and sit home AND
- we're screwed if we pout and bash other potential nominees (which depresses votes) or vote for someone unelectable

The common thread is the pouting.

Plus 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 + one more NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #1
I Will Vote For Hillary No Matter What. Or A Dem. TheMastersNemesis Apr 2015 #2
Thread win at Reply 2 merrily Apr 2015 #229
This Independent will do the same. Xyzse Apr 2015 #278
correct analysis SCantiGOP Apr 2015 #375
That is why I can't go with a feel good vote. Xyzse Apr 2015 #377
I couldn't agree more. Andy823 Apr 2015 #3
You are absoutely right... TreasonousBastard Apr 2015 #4
Makes me sick MaggieD Apr 2015 #5
Alas, between misguided Democrats and... TreasonousBastard Apr 2015 #6
That's funny... sendero Apr 2015 #231
No - he was never a liberal leftynyc Apr 2015 #248
Having a fairly good idea of what we might get from Hillary, Jackpine Radical Apr 2015 #354
I must live in a bubble leftynyc Apr 2015 #356
I'm not basing my observations on DU alone. Jackpine Radical Apr 2015 #358
I could pull up a zillion... sendero Apr 2015 #394
He was never a "Liberal"? bvar22 Apr 2015 #395
I see the problem leftynyc Apr 2015 #436
OH, I see your problem. bvar22 Apr 2015 #443
He never claimed to be a liberal leftynyc Apr 2015 #444
If the party wants the votes of the Left, it should move to the left. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #7
Yeah, that's how we got Bush MaggieD Apr 2015 #9
No that is not how we got bush. The Supreme Court appointed him. onecaliberal Apr 2015 #43
The election never should have been close yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #143
the left installed bush lol frylock Apr 2015 #67
By all means - encourage Bernie to run as an independent MaggieD Apr 2015 #69
if Bernie runs, it won't be as an independent frylock Apr 2015 #73
Bernie has emphasized that he would NOT run as a spoiler Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #74
That's what Nader said too MaggieD Apr 2015 #75
Bernie's been in politics for decades Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #77
That's what Nader said MaggieD Apr 2015 #80
stupid liberals frylock Apr 2015 #88
You'll be explaining how it was smart to vote Nader.... MaggieD Apr 2015 #106
You're beating this dead horse... why? Agschmid Apr 2015 #202
right after you explain how anyone OWES the Democratic party their vote frylock Apr 2015 #281
Never said they did MaggieD Apr 2015 #286
Good point. Why did Bill Clinton do that? ieoeja Apr 2015 #326
Too get elected and it worked MaggieD Apr 2015 #332
I grew up in a swing district that hasn't elected a Democrat since Bill Clinton. ieoeja Apr 2015 #351
Maybe that's why the DLC was disbanded MaggieD Apr 2015 #352
Yup. Agschmid Apr 2015 #201
Where's the link? truebluegreen Apr 2015 #103
To what? MaggieD Apr 2015 #107
To what you categorically stated. truebluegreen Apr 2015 #114
It's not a secret MaggieD Apr 2015 #119
Apparently Jonathan Chait's opinion of and speculation about Nader in a book review is proof. merrily Apr 2015 #246
I think the Clinton Foundation does good things MaggieD Apr 2015 #288
According to you, Chait is "always" a reliable source when he excoriates Nader, but not Clinton. merrily Apr 2015 #294
He is.... MaggieD Apr 2015 #307
Facts and quotes MaggieD Apr 2015 #357
so the left was responsible for Bush because of Nader? backwoodsbob Apr 2015 #225
Not only that, but the ballot was so messed up, people didn't know who they were voting for merrily Apr 2015 #227
And voter caging and other types of 'purges' of folks who would be voting Dem. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #336
Don't be silly. Every problem in this country, from 1900 until the present is the fault of the left merrily Apr 2015 #339
You should read the whole thread MaggieD Apr 2015 #308
wow..that guy used ten thousand words backwoodsbob Apr 2015 #391
It only says nothing to purists and Naderites MaggieD Apr 2015 #393
Wrong. We got Bush by staying in the bland, anti-progressive "center". Ken Burch Apr 2015 #198
I don't think any Dem can beat Hillary. Not this election. bearssoapbox Apr 2015 #226
Too many here are not old enough to remember 1972 NT 1939 Apr 2015 #252
No, we got Bush because Gore ran to the right. Yet it was not to the right enough. jeff47 Apr 2015 #316
Thats incredibly naieve Adrahil Apr 2015 #10
Yep MaggieD Apr 2015 #12
Agree!!! Well said!!! n/t RKP5637 Apr 2015 #79
Actually, that's exactly what the centrists keep doing. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #337
Best summation of the fiasco in FLorida I've read. bvar22 Apr 2015 #396
Amen! n/t markpkessinger Apr 2015 #54
Amen II: Hear, hear. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #85
I'll vote for our candidate, whomever it is, but would a true Liberal PLEASE step up.. OLDMADAM Apr 2015 #126
+1 merrily Apr 2015 #230
+2 /nt RiverLover Apr 2015 #233
Yup. woo me with science Apr 2015 #253
Nader did NOT do it RoccoR5955 Apr 2015 #8
LOL - yes that is the excuse people use MaggieD Apr 2015 #11
200,000+ registered dems voted for bush in FL frylock Apr 2015 #68
So what? MaggieD Apr 2015 #70
who can argue with logic like this? frylock Apr 2015 #72
Common sense MaggieD Apr 2015 #84
stupid liberals frylock Apr 2015 #87
No doubt the words she is looking for truebluegreen Apr 2015 #105
sock puppet arendt Apr 2015 #133
Based on what? MaggieD Apr 2015 #140
You better believe it! Capt. Obvious Apr 2015 #254
Oh, please, everyone knows math and facts have a liberal bias. merrily Apr 2015 #234
The REAL Math comes into play Sheepshank Apr 2015 #361
made me laugh LeftOfWest Apr 2015 #384
Excusing Dems who cross party lines to vote (R), while bashing liberals doesn't stink to high heaven merrily Apr 2015 #232
Gore won the election, in spite of all the Bush/Cheney vote suppression and sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #172
Close enough to steal MaggieD Apr 2015 #174
BINGO! RoccoR5955 Apr 2015 #250
The Supreme Court would have never been involved... Adrahil Apr 2015 #13
Exactly MaggieD Apr 2015 #14
200,000+ idiot democrats that voted for Bush in FL get a free pass though frylock Apr 2015 #283
Thank you deutsey Apr 2015 #327
Take a valium realFedUp Apr 2015 #15
Oh yeah it will - always does when... MaggieD Apr 2015 #17
I believe Obama was elected realFedUp Apr 2015 #24
LOL - cause he lied and pretended to be a lefty liberal MaggieD Apr 2015 #60
So let me get this straight: truebluegreen Apr 2015 #108
Bernie is seen as a socialist MaggieD Apr 2015 #113
The people who have a problem with that would never vote for him anyway. truebluegreen Apr 2015 #116
He's still a socialist MaggieD Apr 2015 #130
No, they are not the same. merrily Apr 2015 #235
The difference between a socialist and a democratic socialist is RoccoR5955 Apr 2015 #329
Hmmm. Reminds me of merrily Apr 2015 #241
For Christ sakes! You cannot gerrymander a US Senator election! longship Apr 2015 #120
I think they forgot the sarcasm tag Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2015 #135
Maybe, or maybe someone is still learning. merrily Apr 2015 #236
Gerrymandering in the Senate? yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #146
This message was self-deleted by its author merrily Apr 2015 #240
Gerrymandering doesn't affect the Senate jmowreader Apr 2015 #228
Because Bernie's not a moron like Nader the abomination libpride_15 Apr 2015 #440
Question MFrohike Apr 2015 #16
Lame excuse.... MaggieD Apr 2015 #23
Hahahaha MFrohike Apr 2015 #30
+1 Well said. BeanMusical Apr 2015 #160
Gore is not / was not a centrist MaggieD Apr 2015 #178
Oh? MFrohike Apr 2015 #237
Gore was not a centrist in 2000, unless you infer something from a founding member of the DLC merrily Apr 2015 #244
<snort> Well said. truebluegreen Apr 2015 #260
Yet fact free <snort> MaggieD Apr 2015 #279
which facts are in dispute? frylock Apr 2015 #285
Keep reading the sub thread MaggieD Apr 2015 #292
So which of his policy positions was.... MaggieD Apr 2015 #277
Where did I say any policy of Vice President Gore was a betrayal of the left? merrily Apr 2015 #282
So you don't think he's capable of his own policies? MaggieD Apr 2015 #284
LOL! Your word twisting is just so very clever--and strangely familiar. merrily Apr 2015 #287
You are free to clarify MaggieD Apr 2015 #291
Give it a rest merrily Apr 2015 #295
Shouldn't you be prepared to back up your arguments? MaggieD Apr 2015 #299
Stop twisting Ms Maggie I said he was in the DLC. That's a fact, not an argument. merrily Apr 2015 #309
So you're saying Gore wasn't liberal enough for you? MaggieD Apr 2015 #318
If by running from it you mean posting the same link... MaggieD Apr 2015 #426
Hoo boy MFrohike Apr 2015 #433
Why not? Because he isn't between stupid and utterly stupid on climate change? TheKentuckian Apr 2015 #422
Bill Clinton is a centrist - Obama is a centrist MaggieD Apr 2015 #423
Not to mention the swell Dems that voted for Reagan. They get a pass too. myrna minx Apr 2015 #258
Democrats for Nixon, too. How many liberals do you think voted for Nixon? merrily Apr 2015 #261
I wouldn't go so far as to blame him for Iraq MaggieD Apr 2015 #296
stupid liberals frylock Apr 2015 #90
and are they strong and loud here. i am trolling a poster because i say supreme crt is priority for seabeyond Apr 2015 #18
who is they, and who are you trolling which you said 3 times in your post? appalachiablue Apr 2015 #57
Ever hear the saying, "Never ask a question unless you already know the answer?" merrily Apr 2015 #245
Can you please try not to jam your candidate up our asses? L0oniX Apr 2015 #19
you would like us to quit talking about the political candidates, on a democratic political board?nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #21
I'm fine with having more than one Dem candidate. L0oniX Apr 2015 #22
me, too. but then i did not suggest people NOT talk about democratic candidates, nt. seabeyond Apr 2015 #26
Some only want to talk about one and attack those that want a Democratic choice. L0oniX Apr 2015 #33
ah. well. i do not see her too far off obama. he mad ea couple good picks. she is adamant with seabeyond Apr 2015 #41
I would never have nominated Kagan. merrily Apr 2015 #317
No love for the coronation? merrily Apr 2015 #297
Oh yeah ...about as much as a funeral. L0oniX Apr 2015 #330
she has the credentials, the history, the experience, the education to run. do not denigrate her seabeyond Apr 2015 #343
No one said she doesn't have the right to run. That is a totally different issue from merrily Apr 2015 #344
Coronation? Coming from the UK...I'm having a hard time understanding it's reference in US Politics Sheepshank Apr 2015 #366
Hmm. I began noticing it before Obama was even re-elected. At that time, I referred to it as merrily Apr 2015 #369
ahhh...so it's a gimmicy word used out of context to badger or belittle a candidacy? Sheepshank Apr 2015 #372
I thought I sensed a gotcha question posing as wide eyed innocent question. merrily Apr 2015 #374
Sorry if it felt like a "gotcha" Sheepshank Apr 2015 #386
No, I said it seemed like a gotcha from the jump merrily Apr 2015 #387
Hi again. I really didn't look at that article before posting it to you merrily Apr 2015 #373
I'm not jamming any candidate up anyone's ass MaggieD Apr 2015 #27
You are jamming the TPP up our ass, a piece of legislation written by lobbyists Cleita Apr 2015 #31
i did not see her take a position on tpp, just call out the misinformation. no position. do you seabeyond Apr 2015 #36
She's been all over this board about TPP for days? Cleita Apr 2015 #47
i saw a couple threads where she was calling out the false information. but, i did not see her seabeyond Apr 2015 #49
Well, then I guess it's wonderful that we can't see what our government is doing Cleita Apr 2015 #51
see. this shit. seabeyond Apr 2015 #52
Exactly MaggieD Apr 2015 #65
You are a fountain of lies. It IS secret. arendt Apr 2015 #152
Nope it's not MaggieD Apr 2015 #161
She may be wrong on facts, but she seems nice. merrily Apr 2015 #262
Here - it's not a secret MaggieD Apr 2015 #427
You are all about it whether you acknowledge it consciously or not. You can count to 50 TheKentuckian Apr 2015 #425
You mean the same way someone who didn't vote for Nader would object... arendt Apr 2015 #150
Oops, you're wrong again MaggieD Apr 2015 #162
True dat. Who could possibly argue with one man's opinion of Nader in a book review? merrily Apr 2015 #263
Facts and quotes and reality MaggieD Apr 2015 #275
Sorry, but opinions are not facts, simply because you share the opinion. merrily Apr 2015 #280
The article is full of facts and quotes MaggieD Apr 2015 #300
Yes, repeatedly stating I'm against it MaggieD Apr 2015 #64
See, and I saw it as being all over this board about Warren's being a liar. merrily Apr 2015 #265
I can't help what happens in your head MaggieD Apr 2015 #301
Try a morning nap. merrily Apr 2015 #304
Try backing up your assertions with facts MaggieD Apr 2015 #306
LOL! Another hilarious MaggieD thread. merrily Apr 2015 #310
Is that your way of saying you can't back up.... MaggieD Apr 2015 #312
Oooooo, I can't back up a statement about how I interpreted something you said with.... merrily Apr 2015 #313
"Interpreted" MaggieD Apr 2015 #314
Um, no I said how I SAW your posts and I NEVER said you were in favor of the TPP. merrily Apr 2015 #315
Sure you did MaggieD Apr 2015 #320
Huh? Whatever Ms. Maggie merrily Apr 2015 #322
No one forces you to reply with your imaginary ideas MaggieD Apr 2015 #350
I'm totally against the TPP MaggieD Apr 2015 #62
You said it wasn't being done in secret in other threads. You said we could all see it anytime. Cleita Apr 2015 #382
OMG! The last thing I want up my ass... NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #199
I'd have gone with the Chryler Building, but maybe that's just me. merrily Apr 2015 #239
Must resist... uhhhh... can't hold back... Then what would be the first thing? L0oniX Apr 2015 #266
Well, that would be a Butterfinger, of course! NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #271
I was thinking a bottle of Schlitz or Falstaff beer while strapped to an inversion table. L0oniX Apr 2015 #273
In a large stadium? I'm there! NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #274
Lol... Agschmid Apr 2015 #203
The left can be terrorized into voting for a centrist betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #20
I'm concentrating here MaggieD Apr 2015 #34
Reeeeeelly? OFA voters will stay home next year? Hekate Apr 2015 #187
They stayed home in 2010 and 2014 betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #216
Smells like sockpuppetry. eom TransitJohn Apr 2015 #25
Based on what? MaggieD Apr 2015 #29
stupid liberals frylock Apr 2015 #91
sock puppet arendt Apr 2015 #134
I call "bullcrap" on your "sockpuppertry" personal attack because you don't like the message. Cha Apr 2015 #39
Thank you MaggieD Apr 2015 #82
You're Welcome, MaggieD.. some are too easily prone to Cha Apr 2015 #211
Agreed. Couple of tag-teamers here, too... Hekate Apr 2015 #194
Newsflash! They already do. eom Cleita Apr 2015 #28
You mean actually talk rationally, AND without name calling? guillaumeb Apr 2015 #32
The Democrat is not liberal enough, Vote republican liberal N proud Apr 2015 #35
Sitting home pouting or.... MaggieD Apr 2015 #37
Now that is true! liberal N proud Apr 2015 #40
Actually, all Republicans have to do is see that Hillary is in the general election, Jamastiene Apr 2015 #38
Quite a few Dems like her for Prez. I was not a Hillary supporter and I don't have a candidate yet Cha Apr 2015 #42
Same here, and.... MaggieD Apr 2015 #46
nope. i may have favs and wants, but nope. i do not need ot beat up the dems. i actually want a seabeyond Apr 2015 #50
They all suck Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2015 #144
Did someone accuse you of being liberal? merrily Apr 2015 #311
Ya'll act like she's already the nominee whatchamacallit Apr 2015 #44
Rec yardwork Apr 2015 #45
I miss the unrec button. Scuba Apr 2015 #48
Another one to put party loyalty over core values and principles Ron Obvious Apr 2015 #53
Seems like you need to read the OP again MaggieD Apr 2015 #59
stupid liberals frylock Apr 2015 #93
sock puppet arendt Apr 2015 #136
Was banned in 2005. BeanMusical Apr 2015 #151
Huh? what is this non sequitur? arendt Apr 2015 #154
Sorry, I thought that you were talking about MaggieD. BeanMusical Apr 2015 #156
There was a recent amnesty? Autumn Apr 2015 #268
me? frylock Apr 2015 #289
No it's all confusing Autumn Apr 2015 #298
sid would never do that. merrily Apr 2015 #331
So true Autumn Apr 2015 #334
LOL merrily Apr 2015 #335
Well, isn't that interesting. progressoid Apr 2015 #376
If Hillary is the nominee, of course I will vote for her, BUT . . . markpkessinger Apr 2015 #55
I also resent the efforts made to shut down the primary process Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #81
Nobody here is trying to shut down the primary process MaggieD Apr 2015 #83
Actually, they are Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #96
+1 n/t markpkessinger Apr 2015 #101
That's true about Warren and Sanders. MaggieD Apr 2015 #104
Sanders is "not electable?" markpkessinger Apr 2015 #408
Well there is a crucial difference MaggieD Apr 2015 #412
On an issue-by-issue basis, I think a lot of people are further to the left than they often realize markpkessinger Apr 2015 #419
Good point! MaggieD Apr 2015 #420
I think you don't grasp "shutting down the Primary Process" very well Sheepshank Apr 2015 #371
The left is powerless and insignificant in American politics and has been for decades Fumesucker Apr 2015 #56
the single most ineffective and powerful voting bloc in the land.. frylock Apr 2015 #71
The left is powerless precisely because of their own actions MaggieD Apr 2015 #78
Exactly, the left doesn't and didn't have the big money necessary to secure political support Fumesucker Apr 2015 #115
Nader had a chance to get Greens funded for future presidential elections MaggieD Apr 2015 #305
We're the political equivalent of the lowly train worker Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #224
The Liberal-bashing squad never sleeps here. arendt Apr 2015 #58
Been here since 2001 MaggieD Apr 2015 #76
stupid liberals frylock Apr 2015 #94
Yes, stupid liberals MaggieD Apr 2015 #98
What a complete tangent that I am not going down arendt Apr 2015 #131
You're ignoring history MaggieD Apr 2015 #173
GOLDSTEIN!!! frylock Apr 2015 #290
Ralph is a doody head Autumn Apr 2015 #302
Post removed Post removed Apr 2015 #129
sock puppet arendt Apr 2015 #137
No, I'm not MaggieD Apr 2015 #142
The comment is directed to frylock, if you can follow the indent. arendt Apr 2015 #145
I think I get it now, sorta Hekate Apr 2015 #205
this is what my repeated posting is based upon.. frylock Apr 2015 #293
I've been here since 2001 also arendt Apr 2015 #128
Please explain the genius move of voting Nader MaggieD Apr 2015 #138
Ask someone who did. I didn't. I aint playin your dumb game arendt Apr 2015 #141
And I'll remember how nasty you are MaggieD Apr 2015 #158
This may be your funniest post yet and that's going some. merrily Apr 2015 #264
You better believe it! Capt. Obvious Apr 2015 #347
R#18 & K, hey, us Dems keep on keeping on, win and lose nt UTUSN Apr 2015 #61
Wow is your analysis vapid and wrong. jeff47 Apr 2015 #63
Yeah, I've listened to "not Nader voters fault" baloney for 15 yrs. MaggieD Apr 2015 #66
stupid liberals frylock Apr 2015 #95
Post removed Post removed Apr 2015 #148
Based on what? MaggieD Apr 2015 #163
Well, if you're right then you should probably start supporting a more liberal candidate. Broward Apr 2015 #86
I want the most liberal AND electable candidate we can get MaggieD Apr 2015 #97
stupid liberals frylock Apr 2015 #89
So you think it was smart of lefty liberals to vote for Nader? MaggieD Apr 2015 #100
sock puppet arendt Apr 2015 #132
lol Change has come Apr 2015 #186
Well, the trick then is to get a candidate we damn well know Is a liberal, innit? Scootaloo Apr 2015 #92
Ah, KY is a bad example of a liberal bastion MaggieD Apr 2015 #102
It's not about "bastions." Scootaloo Apr 2015 #112
Why use Ky as an example of a Dem loss? MaggieD Apr 2015 #118
What does this mean? Fumesucker Apr 2015 #259
It means they didn't want to be associated with extremists MaggieD Apr 2015 #303
Being in favor of equality is extremist? Fumesucker Apr 2015 #400
Let me give you explicit details MaggieD Apr 2015 #402
Bush stole the 2000 election. Gore won popular and electoral votes. morningfog Apr 2015 #99
10000th variation on the same post. still bullshit Doctor_J Apr 2015 #109
+1 BeanMusical Apr 2015 #111
Who running as a democrat for president.... MaggieD Apr 2015 #123
You have it exactly backwards. Voters have to show up, period. Hekate Apr 2015 #210
that is obviously not true, since they don't. I don't understand why people assume that a citizen Doctor_J Apr 2015 #267
+10 appalachiablue Apr 2015 #249
Thanks Maggie for your post. Voting is a right we have, for women and blacks it was always like Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #110
Exactly MaggieD Apr 2015 #121
The think Democrats are too far left crowd has had full sway for 25 years and they have failed TheKentuckian Apr 2015 #435
BING! BING! BING! BING! BING! We have a winner! longship Apr 2015 #117
Thanks! N/t MaggieD Apr 2015 #122
No. This very liberal Democrat thanks you. longship Apr 2015 #127
This ^ ^ ^ Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2015 #153
^^^ This Hekate Apr 2015 #212
Mahalo longship! Cha Apr 2015 #214
You are welcome, my good friend! longship Apr 2015 #217
Exactly, longship.. . "After all, the measure of friendship is not agreement, but respect." Cha Apr 2015 #219
My best to you. And my sincere respect. longship Apr 2015 #220
I meant to say "haven't" found anyone yet.. as you could probably tell Cha Apr 2015 #221
There are two main groups of voters who are not RWers that will stay home on election day: Martin Eden Apr 2015 #124
Where is the fucking evidence she is a centrist????? MaggieD Apr 2015 #125
Her vote for the Iraq war, Larry Summers as her economic advisor Martin Eden Apr 2015 #149
That's all you've got? MaggieD Apr 2015 #157
"when does voting for the war make someone a centrist?" Martin Eden Apr 2015 #243
+100. Its about turnout, not turn-off. arendt Apr 2015 #139
Youre wrong because of Nader, or something. BeanMusical Apr 2015 #167
What a silly post ... Trajan Apr 2015 #147
Where did I say that? MaggieD Apr 2015 #159
Maybe Jeb will run his own version of his dad's Willie Horton ad and win the white vote. Major Hogwash Apr 2015 #155
bitter, fear mongering preachers. is this Fox News? WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2015 #164
Looks like freepervile most days MaggieD Apr 2015 #165
it's insanity. a handful of DUers... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2015 #166
It's not a handful MaggieD Apr 2015 #168
fear driven by conflating mid-term and general election turnout WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2015 #176
Not conflating them at all MaggieD Apr 2015 #182
and now you just lost your Nader. how will you... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2015 #397
you couldn't be more wrong about 2014 WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2015 #442
but don't stop there, Fox News, throw in the Nader boogeyman WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2015 #177
I hope you are wrong. DCBob Apr 2015 #169
So much wrong with this OP, I don't know where to begin. First, WHO is this candidate you sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #170
So you think we should bash Democrats MaggieD Apr 2015 #171
Who is this nominee that you want everyone to support right now? sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #183
I'm twisting YOUR words? MaggieD Apr 2015 #190
Personally I can support any of them MaggieD Apr 2015 #399
Yup.....it's the on going nebulousness that aggravates me. Sheepshank Apr 2015 #398
Oh please Maggie, which one of those teabaggies you voting for? akbacchus_BC Apr 2015 #175
Am waiting for your answer. akbacchus_BC Apr 2015 #181
I'm not so sure MaggieD Apr 2015 #184
Go with your heart and do remember that Democrats akbacchus_BC Apr 2015 #189
I've never voted for a republican in 38 years of voting MaggieD Apr 2015 #191
I disagree with you. DU is for Democrats, if you bash Dems on akbacchus_BC Apr 2015 #195
Really, I guess you missed, "fucking used car salesman" lobbed here? Sheepshank Apr 2015 #405
...... daleanime Apr 2015 #179
ugh vadermike Apr 2015 #180
Agreed all the way! MaggieD Apr 2015 #192
Are you an interior decorator! First and foremost, Hilary is not thinking about akbacchus_BC Apr 2015 #193
Let me tell you this, just the idea of a rethuglican getting into power akbacchus_BC Apr 2015 #185
People need to grow up and realize that Gloria Apr 2015 #188
agreed vadermike Apr 2015 #196
Triumph the WOnder Dog gets my vote before ANY GOPuke. mikehiggins Apr 2015 #197
Without bashing? You yourself have totally failed to do that in this thread. Ken Burch Apr 2015 #200
Maybe in your head MaggieD Apr 2015 #207
Is the OP intended as a threat to make people "like" Hillary? JDPriestly Apr 2015 #204
You HRC bashers have vivid imaginations MaggieD Apr 2015 #209
Well. Then. What was the point of the OP? Please. I'd like to know. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #213
That it's fucking dumb to bash people in our own party MaggieD Apr 2015 #215
And Hillary did not bash Obama in 2008? JDPriestly Apr 2015 #218
She disagreed with him and about him with objective facts MaggieD Apr 2015 #223
As in her constitutency is hard working white people? merrily Apr 2015 #333
I'm seeing a pattern with your posts.... MaggieD Apr 2015 #338
Bull puckies. That was Hillary, Bill (2X) and other Hillary campaign surrogates, namely merrily Apr 2015 #341
Plenty of people see the sexism MaggieD Apr 2015 #345
You misunderstand. I don't care what you see me as. merrily Apr 2015 #368
What happened to your 4th "buh bye" ???? MaggieD Apr 2015 #370
I seem to remember Obama getting pretty mean at that debate Gloria May 2015 #446
Obama won because of his likability. JDPriestly May 2015 #447
Left bad. merrily Apr 2015 #238
You got that hyperbole thing down pat! MaggieD Apr 2015 #340
huh? vadermike Apr 2015 #206
Liberals aren't influenced by Republicans AgingAmerican Apr 2015 #208
This whole thread proves that Will Rogers had us pegged nearly a century ago DFW Apr 2015 #222
............... marmar Apr 2015 #242
If we don't get it together soon, nilesobek Apr 2015 #247
Agree. Then expect a true theocracy. Vinca Apr 2015 #251
If republicans get control of the white house and congress workinclasszero Apr 2015 #319
We're well on our way to a corporate president in 2016. hobbit709 Apr 2015 #255
There's the truth of it. LuvNewcastle Apr 2015 #270
Exactly why we must fight. merrily Apr 2015 #321
Correct MosheFeingold Apr 2015 #364
who cares what republicans think or want. RedstDem Apr 2015 #256
Well, the sooner Turbineguy Apr 2015 #257
unrec G_j Apr 2015 #269
Not if we can draft Warren or find a better candidate than Hillary Clinton. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #272
Can you name those? MaggieD Apr 2015 #276
"You can discuss policy differences without bashing other democrats" bunnies Apr 2015 #323
It wasn't stupid to vote for Nader in a swing state? MaggieD Apr 2015 #362
Sorry. I'm not doing this. I made the mistake of reading this entire thread. bunnies Apr 2015 #365
How it goes with me? MaggieD Apr 2015 #367
I'm voting "ADOAR" -- Any Democrat over a Republican woodsprite Apr 2015 #324
Another hilarious MaggieD thread. merrily Apr 2015 #325
Game over, man! Game over! FSogol Apr 2015 #328
Can you explain how smearing democrats is helpful to the party? MaggieD Apr 2015 #353
I never did understand why you were so intent on smearing Warren sa liar, so no, I can't explain. merrily Apr 2015 #355
I didn't say she was a liar, and I like Warren MaggieD Apr 2015 #359
Yeah, ya did. You posted that POS piece from Banter that said she lied and you said you agreed merrily Apr 2015 #360
How many times are you going to do the buh bye thing? MaggieD Apr 2015 #363
The Banter article simply pointed out what Warren said on National TV: ucrdem Apr 2015 #403
Your statement is FLAT OUT UNTRUE, ucrdem merrily Apr 2015 #406
Don't shoot the messenger. nt ucrdem Apr 2015 #407
As to the contents of your very own untrue post, you are not just a messenger. merrily Apr 2015 #410
For the record, the Maddow video is EMBEDDED in the Banter article, ucrdem Apr 2015 #411
LOL! I knew, that but it doesn't alter the fact that your post was FLAT OUT UNTRUE. merrily Apr 2015 #417
Banter: "she’s not telling you the truth." ucrdem Apr 2015 #418
HUH? See my Reply 360. You made an UNTRUE post and you obviously knew it. merrily Apr 2015 #421
Nothing to see. The issue is, did Banter make its case? It did. ucrdem Apr 2015 #424
NO! That was the issue on another thread two days ago. merrily Apr 2015 #429
Okay. Glad we agree on that much anyway. nt ucrdem Apr 2015 #432
You said Caretha Apr 2015 #441
Bullcrap. Ms. Toad Apr 2015 #342
Okay, site a specific issue by Hillary (not Bill) that makes you feel that way MaggieD Apr 2015 #348
If the GOP wins the White House in 2016, we will lose the SCOTUS for a generation Gothmog Apr 2015 #346
Yep, that's my main concern MaggieD Apr 2015 #349
Can I get a courtesy flush please? progressoid Apr 2015 #378
Here in Oregon, with vote by mail... Binkie The Clown Apr 2015 #379
Yellow Dog Dem HassleCat Apr 2015 #380
If only we'd prosecuted Bush and Cheney...! Octafish Apr 2015 #381
Been reading about stuff leading up to the American Revolution. Cleita Apr 2015 #385
NASA may offer a means... Octafish Apr 2015 #388
Yes....one way. eom Cleita Apr 2015 #389
you raise valid points. we need to stop bashing ourselves samsingh Apr 2015 #383
I have never NOT voted since the day I became "legal" to do so. raven mad Apr 2015 #390
What A Full Court Press Effort colsohlibgal Apr 2015 #392
Major fail! Nader never said what you claim. nichomachus Apr 2015 #401
He said it on the day he launched his campaign in March 2000: ucrdem Apr 2015 #404
He did say that (over and over) - and he is lying about it in your quote MaggieD Apr 2015 #414
If the GOP nomination has the last name "Bush" Jon Ace Apr 2015 #409
Well at least your OP was meant to unify DU and not divide it! Rex Apr 2015 #413
The purists are what divide DU MaggieD Apr 2015 #416
So you are not a purist? Funny you sure do act like one in this thread with everyone. Rex Apr 2015 #434
You are correct. HRC is not progressive enough corkhead Apr 2015 #415
Actually she is very progressive MaggieD Apr 2015 #428
There is actually far more threat of them getting centrists to stay home Bjorn Against Apr 2015 #430
Interesting MaggieD Apr 2015 #431
That's insulting. LWolf Apr 2015 #437
Bottom line is that Bernie is aware of the Nader experience... libpride_15 Apr 2015 #438
OMG - Call me Rip Van Winkle! Caretha Apr 2015 #439
This again? Blue_In_AK Apr 2015 #445
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We're well on our way to ...»Reply #182