Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
45. But, advertising in favor of pot legalisation is NOT hate speech.
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 04:01 PM
Apr 2015

It does not single out a race, religion or ethnic group as a target.

Are you a believer in free speech, or only acceptable speech? guillaumeb Apr 2015 #1
Sorry, the concept of freedom of expression is always relative. Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #6
sex with a minor is illegal. But the age of majority varies by country. guillaumeb Apr 2015 #8
Just as certain language and rhetoric is considered Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #15
You are correct. Charlie Hebdo's racist nonsense was not guillaumeb Apr 2015 #22
We know 'la charmante' Marine and her 'papa ours' very well, thanks. Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #25
Quebecois par naissance, mais j'habite aux EU. guillaumeb Apr 2015 #36
On the knife edge, but I'll wager that if you asked the Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #41
racist in the same way as Reagan was racist guillaumeb Apr 2015 #68
Nor an absolute; which is why rational people hold varying opinions on its spectrum. LanternWaste Apr 2015 #7
How is pushing murder of someone else, freedom of speech? Rex Apr 2015 #12
^^^AMEN to that^^^! Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #19
I can't believe they are going to allow this. nt Rex Apr 2015 #28
As I said up thread, freedom of expression ad absurdum... Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #29
you are confusing propaganda with reality guillaumeb Apr 2015 #21
So how is propaganda calling for the death of Jews, not hate speech? Rex Apr 2015 #27
When anti-Semitic propaganda is paid for by a Jew, guillaumeb Apr 2015 #38
I would say imo it needs to stop when it comes to public paid for transportation? Rex Apr 2015 #44
Voilà la bonne réponse ! There's the right answer! Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #47
"Never said anything about banning it" jberryhill Apr 2015 #51
Okay so when someone comes along and replaces the word 'Jew' with XYZ Rex Apr 2015 #60
Especially since the music video being "quoted" never says "Jew" Scootaloo Apr 2015 #61
I don't think any political ads Oilwellian Apr 2015 #63
'Treating speech equally'...well, there's this from Seattle. As LittleBlue so pertinently asks: Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #62
an interesting, free market solution. I like it. guillaumeb Apr 2015 #69
Start by asking the religioius clerics who preach that LGBT people should be killed. They do this. Bluenorthwest Apr 2015 #88
I believe... Chan790 Apr 2015 #72
Do you believe if there was an anti-Christian ad on a public transit, it would be treated the same still_one Apr 2015 #78
In the US, no, it would not be run. guillaumeb Apr 2015 #84
I think you are right still_one Apr 2015 #89
Somewhere, I see 'hate speech' in this. immoderate Apr 2015 #2
No kidding... Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #4
Hate speech from Pam Geller? Scurrilous Apr 2015 #87
For a freedom to be meaningful, it must extend to both the absurd and the extreme. appal_jack Apr 2015 #3
In nations where this kind of incendiary language has caused wars costing millions of lives, Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #5
How many of those nations had robust free speech protections prior to said tragedies? appal_jack Apr 2015 #83
How much money does the MTA bring in from advertising on busses and trains? surrealAmerican Apr 2015 #9
Sounds like a plan - or they could adopt the French method of mediation... Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #11
That's an odd way you phrased it... Oktober Apr 2015 #10
Guess I should have rolled out this thing again for the sarcasm-challenged... Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #13
I want to see ads on NCY buses that say "Pamela Geller is a hateful bigot" cali Apr 2015 #14
Now, that would be interesting. Do you think the judge Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #17
Fuck yeah davidpdx Apr 2015 #76
Hamas MTV? Capt. Obvious Apr 2015 #16
I sure do miss Yo! Hamas MTV Raps frylock Apr 2015 #32
LOL snooper2 Apr 2015 #85
I miss the game shows, like Remote Control Detonator. Dr. Strange Apr 2015 #73
My favorite category was Dead Or Israeli Capt. Obvious Apr 2015 #75
Somebody needs to get to work on those KamaAina Apr 2015 #18
Somebody will see to it...but why allow the public square to be polluted Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #20
It's that darned First Amendment. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2015 #30
But, advertising in favor of pot legalisation is NOT hate speech. Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #45
The First Amendment doesn't have a "hate speech" exception. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2015 #52
Not the case in the nations which lived through the Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #53
I hear you, but that's not how it is here. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2015 #64
Major cultural difference between the no-holds-barred Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #67
Good. 951-Riverside Apr 2015 #23
Sorry? Are you bringing up some jingoistic, 'Murca, fuck yeah!!!!! Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #26
I like how you avoided everything I said and focused on icons 951-Riverside Apr 2015 #34
And, all Muslims are not Hamas or ISIS sympathizers Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #39
Where did I say anything about "All Muslims"? Go ahead point it out. 951-Riverside Apr 2015 #40
Please read more closely: Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #42
Stop dodging my question, I don't give a damn about anything else you have to say. 951-Riverside Apr 2015 #43
Do it yourself, since you persist in putting words into my text which aren't there. Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #46
Post removed Post removed Apr 2015 #48
You don't know the meaning of "literally," do you? Comrade Grumpy Apr 2015 #31
Ooops! I also said "reincarnation"... 951-Riverside Apr 2015 #37
teh NAZIS!!12 frylock Apr 2015 #33
If I were the judge, I think I'd have to make the same decision tishaLA Apr 2015 #24
Here's some interesting input by LittleBlue. As a judge how would Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #56
I think the appeals court was wrong nt tishaLA Apr 2015 #65
Thanks for answering. Might this go all the way to the SCOTUS? Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #66
More about Pamela Geller Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #35
I love Cali's suggestion up thread davidpdx Apr 2015 #77
Court: Anti-Israel ad can be barred from Metro buses LittleBlue Apr 2015 #49
Good find, LittleBlue. Hate speech of whatever ilk Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #50
Funny how that works, isn't it? arcane1 Apr 2015 #54
They exist simultaneously in two different federal court districts metalbot Apr 2015 #80
They even exist simultaneously on the same court Jim Lane Apr 2015 #86
Oh, joy. I have to see this stupid crap around the city now? stevenleser Apr 2015 #55
More of Pamela Geller's handiwork! Enjoy! Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #58
Just tweeted a response to her... stevenleser Apr 2015 #57
Well done. Not that she'll pay the least bit of attention. Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #59
People should be outraged by Hamas' genocidal fantasy tritsofme Apr 2015 #70
As an NYC resident, I expect these ads to get ye olde vandalism treatment - LiberalElite Apr 2015 #71
Good, waste her and her rabid followers' money. Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #74
For people who would not dream of killing Jews fadedrose Apr 2015 #79
'Stirring the pot is what it is.' That's what hate speech is intended to do. Surya Gayatri Apr 2015 #81
No one will benefit fadedrose Apr 2015 #82
It says pro-Israel group treestar Apr 2015 #90
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Rules MTA Must Run ...»Reply #45