Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What's your response to the "There's [almost] no difference between the two parties" comment? [View all]progree
(10,893 posts)69. Maybe the "Left Column" is dedicated to Hillary's wonderfulness because it's the first week
of her campaign. Maybe.
67. Are those articles curated or criteria-based?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What's your response to the "There's [almost] no difference between the two parties" comment? [View all]
Bucky
Apr 2015
OP
The exclusive right for women and their doctors to make decisions regarding their bodies.
ScreamingMeemie
Apr 2015
#3
Well, it was a convincing two word response to a serious topic... until the poster brought Black Sabbath into it.
Fred Sanders
Apr 2015
#76
The issues on which the two parties differ the least are, in general, those which most affect
nomorenomore08
Apr 2015
#49
I tell them that's why everyone needs to vote, even if we just write-in a name.
canoeist52
Apr 2015
#13
I am totally against the TPP but there are a lot of immediate issues that effect those of us on the
jwirr
Apr 2015
#88
What's your response to the "There's [almost] no difference between the two parties" comment?
DeSwiss
Apr 2015
#15
not to mention the fuggin'supreme court. it is a false statement, they are both alike.
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#16
You got the numero uno issue right up there in the front of the line.. The Environment.
Cha
Apr 2015
#23
The other day I repsonded to a post on FB that said "You had to be an idiot to vote for Obama"
A HERETIC I AM
Apr 2015
#27
Obama raised taxes on the wealthy (top 2 brackets). When did any Repug do that?
progree
Apr 2015
#35
It's immature and generally spoken by people who don't know much about policy
alcibiades_mystery
Apr 2015
#37
After living through the BushCheney era, after almost 13 years at DU, sometimes....
Hekate
Apr 2015
#41
I don't respond, and I never take anything they have to say seriously after that.
Lil Missy
Apr 2015
#42
That Paul Krugman does not know what he is talking about when he disagrees with that assertion.
pampango
Apr 2015
#43
I don't see many women, LGBT or people of color making that argument. Let's start there.
stevenleser
Apr 2015
#45
I don't know I always wanted to see what it was like to live during a Theocracy
LynneSin
Apr 2015
#56
Oh, FFS. Would you get with the program? At least she didn't say "them job-killing regulations"
progree
Apr 2015
#66
Maybe the "Left Column" is dedicated to Hillary's wonderfulness because it's the first week
progree
Apr 2015
#69
Then there should be a Primaries section - she shouldn't hijack the Left section.nt
daredtowork
Apr 2015
#71
I would say I agree that economically there is little difference between the two parties.
liberal_at_heart
Apr 2015
#72
Wisconsin Republicans introduce bill to require photo IDs for food stamp recipients
progree
Apr 2015
#73
If there are those who says there is not any difference in the two parties, if they are speaking
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#78
It tells me they don't care about the lives or rights of the vast majority of Americans
BainsBane
Apr 2015
#85