Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Whhhaaaa...I can't have my pot so I won't vote for Obama. [View all]MineralMan
(146,192 posts)77. If you're on a Windows system,
hold down the Alt key and type 155 on the number pad. When you release the Alt key, this will appear: ¢
On the Mac, Hold down Option and type 4. Or that's what I think it is. I don't do Mac.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I can't stand one issue voters. Like who the hell are they going to vote for? Mittens.
southernyankeebelle
May 2012
#5
Whaaa - I'm dying of cancer and the government is stuck in 1937 with marijuana prohibition.
Throd
May 2012
#7
OT, but I've heard that heroin is far more effective as a painkiller than even opium. Is that true?
coalition_unwilling
May 2012
#25
This post is an indication of just how absurd this war against pot has gotten.
girl gone mad
May 2012
#96
Actually, he did promise that the federal government would take a hands off approach to MMJ.
EOTE
May 2012
#46
imo it's not the weed - it's the principle of maintaining the $tatus quo for...
polichick
May 2012
#17
Voting for Obama is a holding action in hopes of making a bad situation less crappy as
TheKentuckian
May 2012
#23
This is a remarkably ignorant attack against an overall compassionate community...
Luminous Animal
May 2012
#30
When you say "women's choice", you mean "not including the choice to smoke pot," surely?
Romulox
May 2012
#37
If they had meant "birth control", then why say "choice", which implies, well... nt
Romulox
May 2012
#41
There is no question in the OP at all. Can't answer a question that was never asked.
Luminous Animal
May 2012
#40
Correct, but the OP IS a challenge that demands one defend not voting for Obama solely on that basis
stevenleser
May 2012
#63
How many people here have actually said they're NOT voting for Obama?
Warren DeMontague
May 2012
#80
People who really think this is important would not be focused on the Presidency
treestar
May 2012
#51
You've been told that the President DOES have the power to reschedule Cannabis.
Romulox
May 2012
#59
Besides, if you had the ability to interpret US Code, you'd know this stuff already.
Romulox
May 2012
#70
There is no subsection (a)(1)(B)(2). It's not a good cite, under standard legal notation.
Romulox
May 2012
#75
It seems to me you want to have it both ways, isn't that what California did?
Uncle Joe
May 2012
#62
We can walk and chew gum at the same time. Remember "hold my feet to the fire"?
Warren DeMontague
May 2012
#79
I asked elsewhere in the thread, maybe you missed it: how many people have actually said that?
Warren DeMontague
May 2012
#87
it was a couple of other threads ---from now tombstoned members---that were posting that shit.
trumad
May 2012
#88
Is demeaning and caricaturing other DUers supposed to persuade them to your way of thinking?
stranger81
May 2012
#99