General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should a 3-year-old child's testimony to his teacher (on child abuse) be admitted in court? [View all]davidpdx
(22,000 posts)On Sun Mar 29, 2015, 09:06 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Manhate?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6431917
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Is this what passes for discussion on this forum these days? "Fuck off asshole."
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Mar 29, 2015, 09:14 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: sometimes the response is necessary, to the absolute insulting comment. Leave it.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Everything up until the part where the poster writes the last line is within bounds. It is telling someone to "fuck off" and calling them an asshole that is against the rules on DU
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I like this poster, but I always vote to hide personal attacks like this. I do understand the emotion that probably caused it however.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: over the line
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not sure who "fuck off asshole" is directed at. The stepdad in the OP, or 99Forever?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be interesting to hear from Juror #1 who voted to leave it alone and basically said the person had it coming, Juror #2 and #3 voted to leave it with no explanation.
The person alerted on had 2 hides already in the past 90 days and narrowly averted a 3rd.