Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

napi21

(45,806 posts)
7. Did you ever think that she wanted her email to be secure, and since the server was set up
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 11:55 PM
Mar 2015

for the former President, she believed THAT to be much more secure than .gov?

I know I thought of that.

Just what is it that the right thinks she is hiding? notadmblnd Mar 2015 #1
Haaha..Oh f*ck that's funny! Kudos to you my friend..Spot On. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #13
Maybe she should have thought about that before she deleted the emails Travis_0004 Mar 2015 #27
She did, it was at the State Department. notadmblnd Mar 2015 #32
She did not have a back-up at State. morningfog Mar 2015 #34
What do you think she is hiding? notadmblnd Mar 2015 #36
No idea at all. morningfog Mar 2015 #39
There's a lot of HRC haters, so when someone produces what ever it is you all think might ruin her- notadmblnd Mar 2015 #54
Probably nothing. But it's the impression given when someone deletes all their emails. Not to sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #44
The impression. Heh notadmblnd Mar 2015 #52
"i don't think she is hiding anything" NM_Birder Mar 2015 #81
If I scrub my drive I do it NSA standards. hobbit709 Mar 2015 #94
What was on the 18 minute "gap"? Doesn't matter and won't find out, still Nixon was shown the door. leveymg Mar 2015 #83
I think there was a little more to Nixon's resignation than the 18 minute gap notadmblnd Mar 2015 #84
In the end, "the 18 min. gap" and initially withheld "smoking gun tape" (OOJ) sealed Nixon's fate. leveymg Mar 2015 #86
From what you posted, it was what was in the Smoking gun tape that did Nixon in, notadmblnd Mar 2015 #91
They might both be relevant to HRC's situation. leveymg Mar 2015 #93
Which take us back to my original question. notadmblnd Mar 2015 #96
Hasn't the Benghazi investigations concluded that there was no wrongdoing by CTyankee Mar 2015 #77
Because by god, they've had to tolerate a black man in the White House for the past 8 years notadmblnd Mar 2015 #85
"I'm in no way, shape or form a feminist"? KamaAina Mar 2015 #87
The Gov. has a backup copy on the NSA server. Downwinder Mar 2015 #2
Link to that. former9thward Mar 2015 #50
If they had a copy of the Petraeus emails, you have to expect that NSA would have HRC bugged. leveymg Mar 2015 #97
Not according to panel discussion by journos on the Diane Rehm show. Divernan Mar 2015 #53
I jest, of course. Downwinder Mar 2015 #60
+ 37! rgbecker Mar 2015 #80
Now if the NSA was actually working for the government... Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #78
My personal belief is: It's not a big deal. The Benghazi thing has been investigated to death by ... BlueJazz Mar 2015 #3
I have no idea, nor do I care. morningfog Mar 2015 #4
Its ridiculous that she is our party's chosen one. RiverLover Mar 2015 #5
She is? Renew Deal Mar 2015 #10
Oh, I agree that this was a foolish decision. One good thing. It's a fairly long way till Voting Day BlueJazz Mar 2015 #6
It just looks bad ripcord Mar 2015 #43
Did you ever think that she wanted her email to be secure, and since the server was set up napi21 Mar 2015 #7
That's fine, but she could have had two accounts morningfog Mar 2015 #9
I agree that it's ethically challenged Renew Deal Mar 2015 #12
Well time will tell if it hurts her. notadmblnd Mar 2015 #23
HA! And you really believe the Pubs wouldn't still be screaming for access to her other emails napi21 Mar 2015 #72
Bill Clinton has said he only has sent 2 emails in his life. former9thward Mar 2015 #51
Interesting that you can't come up with even one reason to reconcile that statement. Thor_MN Mar 2015 #75
Try again. former9thward Mar 2015 #82
Nice try, you still fail. Thor_MN Mar 2015 #88
Oh so his spokesman is lying... former9thward Mar 2015 #89
Nice try at deflection of your faulty logic... Thor_MN Mar 2015 #90
if you didn't care CatWoman Mar 2015 #45
You should read more carefully. morningfog Mar 2015 #61
Then produce the email Renew Deal Mar 2015 #8
She never corresponded with me. And it wouldn't morningfog Mar 2015 #11
I do not give a Sh*t what the Right wing nuts think awake Mar 2015 #14
ZZZZZZZZZZ DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #15
I, like you and Hillary, wish she had not created this issue. morningfog Mar 2015 #16
I though you said it was of no moment. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #17
Good lord. Sit down with a dictionary and read slowly. morningfog Mar 2015 #19
When folks are condescending I assume they are compensating for something... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #21
Dude, mirror. morningfog Mar 2015 #25
I answered your questions...You didn't like the answers so you made it about me... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #26
You found the mirror! Good first step. morningfog Mar 2015 #28
... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #30
Tony Rezco bad? alcibiades_mystery Mar 2015 #18
He was the gentleman who helped Barack Obama buy his Hyde Park home./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #20
And it's Rezko, not Rezco... It is Tuesday Mar 2015 #22
Just shows how quickly he receded into the dustbin of history./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #24
Some remember him, just like I remember Rosemary Wood fadedrose Mar 2015 #33
I remember Bert Lance, poor fella.../NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #35
That's why it's a shame to put her in the same category fadedrose Mar 2015 #46
Who? alcibiades_mystery Mar 2015 #38
If she's ends up the nominee, let's hope so. morningfog Mar 2015 #29
Maybe it's a psycologial plot fadedrose Mar 2015 #31
Looks bad? Is bad. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2015 #37
Welcome to DU./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #41
Thanks Cheese Sandwich Mar 2015 #48
Exactly. RiverLover Mar 2015 #64
... Quackers Mar 2015 #65
My nieces were talking about this. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2015 #73
Thank you. nt woo me with science Mar 2015 #71
Sorry, not bad, actually good. Darb Mar 2015 #74
Maybe she wanted an excuse not to run LiberalAndProud Mar 2015 #40
That would be fantastic. It would carry the added benefit of the republican focus being morningfog Mar 2015 #42
as marvelous an outcome as that may be... Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #56
Then seems like a bone-headed move LiberalAndProud Mar 2015 #57
I would say it is Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #70
To me this is not as bad as the billing records Yupster Mar 2015 #98
The 18½ minute gap in the Nixon tapes was a huge scandal. Scrabbleddie Mar 2015 #47
***Breaking News**** Trey Gowdy sings Karaoke to the Clinton email server KMOD Mar 2015 #49
Only one good reason to do it Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #55
Whataver it was, it must have been more embarrassing than getting caught erasing it. LiberalAndProud Mar 2015 #58
Well, just a few short weeks ago, there were some who were saying that it was not illegal. Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #59
^^^^^^ This is the correct answer. ^^^^^^^^ woo me with science Mar 2015 #63
Excellent post. woo me with science Mar 2015 #62
She must be hiding that e-mail to the BENGHAZI terrorists ordering them to attack now! B Calm Mar 2015 #66
Or the real murderer of Vince Foster and the paternity of Chelsea. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #67
kick woo me with science Mar 2015 #68
The proper way to scrub a hard drve seveneyes Mar 2015 #69
That doesn't look particularly useful for those of us Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #79
How does that line go? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #76
Can I ask a point of information? WHO -really- owns the server? HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #92
There was this: morningfog Mar 2015 #95
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scrubbing the server look...»Reply #7