Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Sorry, y'all lost me a long time ago. DCKit May 2012 #1
Don't you know the boys were terrorists disguised as children? Hope coalition_unwilling May 2012 #34
I would expect nothing different from a murderer gratuitous May 2012 #2
"why the victims didn't deserve any consideration" Bolo Boffin May 2012 #3
It's right there gratuitous May 2012 #4
Nothing you pointed out said innocent victims deserve no consideration, which is what I asked. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #5
+1,000,000,000 x 1,000,000,000 - n/t coalition_unwilling May 2012 #38
Brennan is a liar and can't be trusted. morningfog May 2012 #6
Brennan is the source for all the information we've been discussing. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #7
He is admitting to deaths because his lies were exposed. He is a fraud. morningfog May 2012 #8
He is standing by his statement from June 29, 2011. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #11
He knew it was false at the time he made it. His little dance was not impressive. morningfog May 2012 #20
We've established that this is what you think. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #21
Here: morningfog May 2012 #24
Three of your links are outside the time frame Brennan specified. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #26
HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Too funny. I'm done with your pimping for propaganda. morningfog May 2012 #27
Apple doesn't fall far from the tree. That Eichmann Brennan coalition_unwilling May 2012 #35
Proportionality? What tripe. Vattel May 2012 #9
You use quotation marks, but I fail to find that quote in his remarks. n/t Bolo Boffin May 2012 #12
It was not a quote (obviously). Vattel May 2012 #14
Obviously, because Brennan expresses exactly the opposite as I quoted in Post 3. n/t Bolo Boffin May 2012 #15
I'm not sure I see your point. Vattel May 2012 #16
My point is that you manufactured a hideous position to paint Brennan as worse than he is. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #17
Nonsense. You missed the point of my snarky imaginary quote. Vattel May 2012 #22
"My prediction: you will never see him seriously discussing that issue." Bolo Boffin May 2012 #23
Minimizing deaths relative to other military strategies is a different issue. Vattel May 2012 #33
This is how I understand proportionality. From the ICRC: Bolo Boffin May 2012 #36
That is proportonality as legally defined. Vattel May 2012 #60
Why isn't this murderer in the dock instead of talking about ethics? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2012 #10
"he does sparkle at blaming the victims" -- I didn't see this. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #13
Great. I look forward to the installments EFerrari May 2012 #18
Brennan opposed waterboarding. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #19
Are you Brennan's PR rep? morningfog May 2012 #25
No. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #28
I am interested in an honest discussion, which neither you nor Brennan seem capable of. morningfog May 2012 #29
I'm quite capable of an honest, respectful discussion. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #30
No, he did not. EFerrari May 2012 #31
Yes, he did, as your own link to Greenwald states. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #39
The Obama/Brennan connection is troubling at best whatchamacallit May 2012 #45
Butt covering. nt bemildred May 2012 #32
Everybody on DU needs to know this lying sack of shit Brennan coalition_unwilling May 2012 #37
"back in the late 90s, early 00s." Bolo Boffin May 2012 #40
Do you know how to read? Tenet was his coalition_unwilling May 2012 #41
I do know how to read. Both Tenet and Brennan got their jobs under Clinton, right? n/t Bolo Boffin May 2012 #44
What possible difference could it make who gave those coalition_unwilling May 2012 #61
And who is going to enforce these rules? JDPriestly May 2012 #42
We are. And according to Brennan, this administration is. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #46
So comforting whatchamacallit May 2012 #48
You say the intelligence is untested. Does that mean it actually is? n/t Bolo Boffin May 2012 #49
It means whatchamacallit May 2012 #50
OK, that's what you think is going on. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #52
You shouldn't whatchamacallit May 2012 #53
And the alert results are in DisgustipatedinCA May 2012 #54
Saying I have an "affinity with the soulless" is insulting and over the top. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #55
Yes that must be it whatchamacallit May 2012 #56
Perhaps you could start another thread about your belief that Osama bin Laden isn't dead Bolo Boffin May 2012 #57
I don't know what to believe whatchamacallit May 2012 #58
Feel free to discuss whether bin Laden is dead or not in another thread. n/t Bolo Boffin May 2012 #59
Excuses. Excuses. I am not convinced. JDPriestly May 2012 #62
Only you would use the words of a POS Bush Tool to justify our crimes whatchamacallit May 2012 #43
Brennan was first hired under the Clinton administration, right? Bolo Boffin May 2012 #47
Clinton's fuck-ups don't matter whatchamacallit May 2012 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Efficacy and Ethics o...»Reply #45