Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
20. Going to call this out every time I see it.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 10:35 AM
Mar 2015

He is Christian. Period. Being a bad person doesn't make him not a Christian. If you're going to define him as "Christian", than the Pope is "Christian", because I don't think Jesus would have approved of his hypocrisy, homophobia, etc. And if the Pope isn't Christian by your standard, then I think it's a pretty baseless standard.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/No_True_Scotsman

With respect to religion, the fallacy is well used, often even overused. Religious apologists will repeatedly try to use the No True Scotsman argument to distance themselves from more extreme or fundamentalist groups, but this does not prevent such extremists actually being religious - they themselves would certainly argue otherwise. Moderate Muslim leaders, for example, are well known for declaring Islamic extremists as "not true Muslims" as Islam is a "religion of peace." Similarly, moderate Christians, such as those in Europe, are sometimes aghast when viewing their fundamentalist counterparts in the US, immediately declaring them "not true Christians," even though they believe in the same God and get their belief system from the same book. Many of these statements stating that the extremists are not true believers are often used as a reaction against Guilt by Association.

The No True Scotsman fallacy can also run the other way when it comes to extremism. Extremists will make a religious statement and when someone points out that there are many believers who don't believe the extremist's viewpoint, the moderates are deemed to be not true believers (ie: Christians who support gay marriage are not "real Christians" or Muslims who support women's rights are not "real Muslims&quot . Modern pagans do it all the time, perhaps even more than other religions, due to the fact that there is no agreed-on orthodoxy for the whole group, with some well-established practices in one setting being considered unpalatable in others. Silver Ravenwolf, one of the best selling "leaders" of neopagans, has done this with multiple ancient, well-established practices.

It's a tricky business, as being a member of a religious group, to the minds of those involved, encompasses adhering to a certain standard of behavior. For example, charity can certainly be called an essentially Christian ethic, considering the emphasis that Jesus placed on it. The man himself would most definitely disavow the greedy and "What's mine is mine" mindset of many right-wingers who call themselves Christians. However, strictly speaking, a Christian is defined as "one who professes belief in the teachings of Jesus Christ"; there's no rule saying they have to do it right./div]
God rewards those that give to Ted 'Eh Cruz Capt. Obvious Mar 2015 #1
heads would explode all over America guillaumeb Mar 2015 #2
He wants to abolish the IRS corkhead Mar 2015 #3
But his daddy told him that he is God's favorite person....like ever! world wide wally Mar 2015 #4
way to create a narcissist. The Republicans hate liberal parents for trying to encourage liberal_at_heart Mar 2015 #5
And didn't he put little Teddie leftieNanner Mar 2015 #25
if there is a god olddots Mar 2015 #6
one of the best examples of walking a mile rurallib Mar 2015 #7
Ignorance and absolute certainty hifiguy Mar 2015 #8
Imagine major cable news networks cheering and slobbering over the religious candidate..... Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #9
Spot On! LittleGirl Mar 2015 #10
K&FuckingR...... daleanime Mar 2015 #11
Bravo! Hulk Mar 2015 #12
Bible thumpers give me the willies vlyons Mar 2015 #13
DURec for Rudie. bvar22 Mar 2015 #14
B-I Scurrilous Mar 2015 #15
rude pundit barbtries Mar 2015 #16
their widdle heads would be exploding--oh, what a thought! niyad Mar 2015 #17
Thanks Rude.. "Christian" needs to be in quotes, imo.. Don't know much about religion but I Cha Mar 2015 #18
Going to call this out every time I see it. F4lconF16 Mar 2015 #20
Call it out all you want.. cruz is nothing but a punk ass liar.. Cha Mar 2015 #21
Can't disagree with that! Gonna love watching him fail...I hope o.O F4lconF16 Mar 2015 #22
Absolutely Positively LOVE this part: calimary Mar 2015 #19
As usual, I say ditto. Ted Cruz is a waste of time and energy. mountain grammy Mar 2015 #23
What has long bothered me about far too many SheilaT Mar 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Rude Pundit - Imagin...»Reply #20