General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Women only: Regarding the use of the term 'girls' to describe women. [View all]DutchLiberal
(5,744 posts)seabeyond has made as much posts, if not more, in this thread. But she's not being accused of "angry revenge", is she?
I thought your post was sincere, but maybe I was wrong. If you look at my posts in this thread in which I argue, with arguments, you know, ideas and such, and then say they're "angry revenge", I start getting doubts you are as impartial as you made yourself out to be.
Up-thread, I've argued why it is condescending of self-proclaimed feminists to belittle other women, saying they "have serious self-respect issues". In the post you were replying to, I've gone to great lenghts to explain where I stand with regard to feminist issues and how I see them getting corrupted by a small but vocal minority on this website. And I've backed up my claims. What responses do I get? Either nothing, or the two standard responses the two most vocal feminists on this thread ALWAYS resort to:
"Sweet Jesus", "My God", "Sigh" (redqueen) or "lol", "rofl", "lmao" (seabeyond)
Real gems, eh? That's the ONLY answer they EVER give when faced with arguments, ideas and theories that don't agree with them.
Just look at what seabeyond wrote in response a post of mine down-thread: more trolling. More trying to get a rise out of me. Getting a rise out of people is what she does whenever they don't agree with her. She's been playing this childish game with me throughout the entire thread. Just look for it yourself, I've had to break off two possible flamewars that she wanted to instigate with her trollish behavior. She's stalking me throughout the entire thread childishly trying to get a rise out of me.
... and then I'M the one who's looking for "angry revenge"?
Please...