Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ismnotwasm

(41,974 posts)

34. Mwahaha!

Reply to Brother Buzz (Reply #3)

Wed Mar 18, 2015, 08:46 PM

Mar 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Water Fluoridation Linked to Higher ADHD Rates [View all] G_j Mar 2015 OP

Correlation does not equal causation. uppityperson Mar 2015 #1

Correct. But the study deserves follow-up to make sure there isn't a causal connection. n/t pnwmom Mar 2015 #2

"But scientists were quick to point out that this is just one study, and doesn’t prove..." uppityperson Mar 2015 #4

Who said it proved anything? But it wasn't just one study, and the Harvard epidemiologist said the issue deserves further study pnwmom Mar 2015 #24

They suggest no such thing kcr Mar 2015 #37

Fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face Brother Buzz Mar 2015 #3

Ice cream, Mandrake! Children's ice cream! DefenseLawyer Mar 2015 #11

Mwahaha! ismnotwasm Mar 2015 #34

Global warming linked to a reduction in the pirate population Major Nikon Mar 2015 #5

Thanks for posting that. It's a perfect example. FSogol Mar 2015 #23

Areas where flouridation exists just MAY be where JDDavis Mar 2015 #6

Autism linked to consumption of organic foods... SidDithers Mar 2015 #7

If we keep eating this healthy we are all doomed to some disease, I swear! JDDavis Mar 2015 #8

funny, however G_j Mar 2015 #9

I'm so stealing that ismnotwasm Mar 2015 #35

A Fair Criticism Of This Paper, IMO. HuckleB Mar 2015 #10

Another fisk of Ken Perrott – the climate denier gift that keeps on giving G_j Mar 2015 #12

Maybe one day you'll be able to actually discuss the topic at hand. HuckleB Mar 2015 #14

I'd be glad to G_j Mar 2015 #15

Why does good science scare you? HuckleB Mar 2015 #16

no, G_j Mar 2015 #20

You seem to like to spread questionable studies without bothering to explore them first. HuckleB Mar 2015 #21

it's an article from Newsweek G_j Mar 2015 #22

Why do a climate denier's scientific views appeal to you? pnwmom Mar 2015 #26

When you cite a climate denier as a source that is important to know. pnwmom Mar 2015 #25

What makes you think he's a "climate denier"? Major Nikon Mar 2015 #28

Post # 12. pnwmom Mar 2015 #29

You do realize post#12 is sourcing a no-shit climate change denier, yes? Major Nikon Mar 2015 #30

That's why I first cited post 12 and then removed the link. I think the reason pnwmom Mar 2015 #31

You might want to redirect your "climate denier" allegation to the author of post #12 Major Nikon Mar 2015 #32

You are reading my sentence backwards, apparently. pnwmom Mar 2015 #33

I could care less about cat book authors Major Nikon Mar 2015 #36

No, I don't. In my second post I referred back to another poster, to explain why I had answered pnwmom Mar 2015 #39

OK, let's start over Major Nikon Mar 2015 #40

A fair discussion of this starting at Fluoride Skepti Forum. HuckleB Mar 2015 #13

Critical Review and Appraisal of the piece by Marco Ghassemi HuckleB Mar 2015 #17

This is bullshit. ananda Mar 2015 #18

Um, yeah there is. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2015 #38

If this is true, did they compare the statistics to areas with too much natural fluorine? Thirties Child Mar 2015 #19

This will open another battle in the culture war, just wait and see... DonViejo Mar 2015 #27

As my statistics teacher in college used to say... MiniMe Mar 2015 #41