Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Water Fluoridation Linked to Higher ADHD Rates [View all]G_j
(40,366 posts)12. Another fisk of Ken Perrott – the climate denier gift that keeps on giving
http://www.investigatemagazine.co.nz/Investigate/3552/another-fisk-of-ken-perrott-the-climate-denier-gift-that-keeps-on-giving/
Every now and then, a climate denier comes along and presents himself as a gift thats just too good to ignore.
Ken Perrott of the OpenParachute blog is one such gift.
First, he was in denial of discrepancies in the temperature records.
Then, he was in denial of the limited effect of human CO2 emissions on climate, as documented in peer-reviewed papers.
Now, hes in denial that theres been no significant global warming since the 1990s a trend that even NASAs James Hansen has recently conceded and hes in denial that the latest hockey stick study by Shaun Marcott has been discredited, even though Marcott himself was forced to admit over the weekend that the data did not support his claims.
Ken Perrott is also in denial that Michael Manns original hockey stick study has been discredited, even though anyone with eyes could see that warm temperatures a thousand years ago mysteriously disappeared from Manns graph, despite remaining on hundreds of other published scientific studies.
The discreditation of Manns hockey stick has been widely published in official reports, books and papers but as I said, one doesnt even have to go that far. By making the Medieval Warm Period disappear (even though the warmth appears in his own raw data), Mann achieves a hockey stick effect with a blade spiking upward in the 20th century.
The Climategate papers from the University of East Anglia are rife with discussions by climate scientists Manns colleagues on how to make the MWP disappear. The same climategate emails also cast doubt on Manns work. As a climate denier, however, Ken doesnt read such things. His attachment to climate change is religious in nature, a show of faith perhaps
Every now and then, a climate denier comes along and presents himself as a gift thats just too good to ignore.
Ken Perrott of the OpenParachute blog is one such gift.
First, he was in denial of discrepancies in the temperature records.
Then, he was in denial of the limited effect of human CO2 emissions on climate, as documented in peer-reviewed papers.
Now, hes in denial that theres been no significant global warming since the 1990s a trend that even NASAs James Hansen has recently conceded and hes in denial that the latest hockey stick study by Shaun Marcott has been discredited, even though Marcott himself was forced to admit over the weekend that the data did not support his claims.
Ken Perrott is also in denial that Michael Manns original hockey stick study has been discredited, even though anyone with eyes could see that warm temperatures a thousand years ago mysteriously disappeared from Manns graph, despite remaining on hundreds of other published scientific studies.
The discreditation of Manns hockey stick has been widely published in official reports, books and papers but as I said, one doesnt even have to go that far. By making the Medieval Warm Period disappear (even though the warmth appears in his own raw data), Mann achieves a hockey stick effect with a blade spiking upward in the 20th century.
The Climategate papers from the University of East Anglia are rife with discussions by climate scientists Manns colleagues on how to make the MWP disappear. The same climategate emails also cast doubt on Manns work. As a climate denier, however, Ken doesnt read such things. His attachment to climate change is religious in nature, a show of faith perhaps
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Correct. But the study deserves follow-up to make sure there isn't a causal connection. n/t
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#2
"But scientists were quick to point out that this is just one study, and doesn’t prove..."
uppityperson
Mar 2015
#4
Who said it proved anything? But it wasn't just one study, and the Harvard epidemiologist said the issue deserves further study
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#24
Fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face
Brother Buzz
Mar 2015
#3
You seem to like to spread questionable studies without bothering to explore them first.
HuckleB
Mar 2015
#21
You might want to redirect your "climate denier" allegation to the author of post #12
Major Nikon
Mar 2015
#32
No, I don't. In my second post I referred back to another poster, to explain why I had answered
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#39
If this is true, did they compare the statistics to areas with too much natural fluorine?
Thirties Child
Mar 2015
#19