Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Can someone tell me the saga of the poster known as "Better Believe It" [View all]Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)104. That's kind of creepy, stevenleser.
By all means, let's have an investigation because some made an alert you didn't like.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
185 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Can someone tell me the saga of the poster known as "Better Believe It" [View all]
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
OP
Long time troll, stayed on the fence as much as possible, but finally went too far.
randome
Mar 2015
#1
I lose track of time. Was it 2 years ago? 3? Maybe you were on hiatus from DU then?
randome
Mar 2015
#3
I don't remember him all that much or at all...He's green* . I'm blue,
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#12
Yeah, I didn't want to say it. Some folks are clearly looking for a reason to alert...
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#45
Exactly. That post was not even close to personal attack. But obviously some hit dogs hollered
Number23
Mar 2015
#153
Interesting. So posting something from Matt Rothschild and the Progressive makes you a RW troll??
RufusTFirefly
Mar 2015
#94
No, posting something from The Weekly Standard, Avik Roy and Tim Carney make you a RW troll...
SidDithers
Mar 2015
#113
And to add to the other reply to you, completely mischaracterizing what the President said in order
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#123
My "favorite" was Seventh Son who said the CIA gave Jamaican men man boobs.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#10
No, you rec'ed a crazy attack on the President that even had Skinner, who stays out of
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#36
All the good intentions in the world are no reason to recommend a crazy and dishonest OP.
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#49
Nope, this is a forum. Everyone can see it. It's not a private discussion between you and I.
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#61
Do my contentions stand up against yours? Well I don't quote antisemites for backup
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#176
No, I may not have worded it elegantly, but the point is Skinner said it didnt say what BBI said it
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#115
I don't think the chance that is coincidence is very high. Admins should look into that alert.
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#42
Before I clicked on the list of reccers, I made a mental list of who is likely to be named there
Sheepshank
Mar 2015
#50
A belief that people here only rec OPs that they agree with is......interesting.
djean111
Mar 2015
#55
Nope, I made no such comment. You find it embarrassing because it is, not because of what I wrote.nt
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#76
I guess I didn't see that one --an epic post-- and nice work by you msanthrope.
panader0
Mar 2015
#167
Too bad getting shitcanned for right-wing trollery only seems to happen in GD / LBN
Scootaloo
Mar 2015
#128
No--and I'd mock anybody who cited Tucker Carlson's rag into the ground. nt
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#137
Read also for the simpletons having the time of their lives yukking it up in that thread
Number23
Mar 2015
#156
No, but msanthrope's chums SidDithers and zappaman found much in common with SDuderstadt.
Octafish
Mar 2015
#44
Just as I expected, first one off the bat doesnt say what you imply it says.
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#66
Its a forum. Anyone can respond to you on any comment. That doesnt make it tag team. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#73
Hey, I know you are embarrassed by your rec and you should be. That's not my fault. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#78
What I "wonder" is how someone ends up quoting and rec'ing so many trolls and antisemites
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#175
PMs from one to you means nothing. And finally your fourth link above, which I have to
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#120
He seems to believe any disagreement with him constitutes a right wing conspiracy.
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#122
Show where I post ''hypothetically, mocking laughable conspiracy theory bullshit''
Octafish
Mar 2015
#92
Yes, you have implied it constantly. Disagreeing with you=pro right wing. You've implied that again
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#119
And in your world, that includes them denigrating BBI who it turns out was a right wing troll? nt
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#63
Octa....I never claimed to be as good as Sid and Zappa....but they were correct. nt
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#105
Actually, it seems to come up in response to a whole lot of people who are in good standing.
Marr
Mar 2015
#70
Purists and right wingers are mutually exclusive as used on this board.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#19
That's your interpretation and spin. Another interpretation, which has more evidence, is to
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#25
It has everything to do with what you said as I am sure most who read it and your comments will note
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#30
I have no problem with comparing recs. That's part of the transparency of DU.
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#142
I doubt that either variety of troll employs more dishonest attacks or spurious arguments than the
Marr
Mar 2015
#165
Used to get hundreds of recs for constant anti-Dem, especially anti-Obama tirades. Sound familiar?
Tarheel_Dem
Mar 2015
#152