General Discussion

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)

22. So, no, she hasn't change her stance.

Fri Mar 6, 2015, 01:26 AM

Mar 2015

And other DUers pushing her stance is not something you have chosen to address. Why is that?

Please don't play games. I'm much too old for this nonsense.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jane Goodall’s Troubling, Error-Filled New Book, ‘Seeds of Hope’ [View all] HuckleB Mar 2015 OP

The Jane Goodall Book Scandal: Most Journalists Hold Back but One Doesn’t Shy Away from Criticizing HuckleB Mar 2015 #1

And another 2 yr old article. I am wondering what happened when they pulled the books, if uppityperson Mar 2015 #17

If accurate, that is inexcusable. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2015 #2

Maybe. Unfortunately, it's not unusual for scientists late in life. HuckleB Mar 2015 #3

That is sad and quite frankly, dangerous. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2015 #4

All too true, though it does make the biographies more interesting! HuckleB Mar 2015 #5

Their legacy, well at least in the gentleman's case, does demonstrate how anyone can Jefferson23 Mar 2015 #6

We can hope that she'll go with science, as Bill Nye has done. HuckleB Mar 2015 #7

Yes, no doubt about that and thanks for the OP. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2015 #8

You two have cubicles next to each other? brentspeak Mar 2015 #15

hahaha, my thoughts too, exactly. nt laundry_queen Mar 2015 #18

You would have to stop promoting scams, first. HuckleB Mar 2015 #31

What scam am I promoting? laundry_queen Mar 2015 #33

Anti-GMO propaganda. HuckleB Mar 2015 #37

AAAS Scientists: Consensus on GMO Safety Firmer Than For Human-Induced Climate Change HuckleB Mar 2015 #41

This message was self-deleted by its author closeupready Mar 2015 #26

Are you incapable of thought? HuckleB Mar 2015 #30

No. You found two people who don't appreciate plagiarism. I suspect you already Jefferson23 Mar 2015 #34

Just read the Daily Beast and MIT pieces ... REP Mar 2015 #9

I don't know about generations, but... HuckleB Mar 2015 #10

That seems to jibe with my untested, wildass theory REP Mar 2015 #13

You do know that you can test those theories against actual evidence, right? HuckleB Mar 2015 #20

She lost her fastball. maybe this book should be put aside. AngryAmish Mar 2015 #11

Indeed. Unfortunately, she's still pushing anti-science, anti-GMO silliness. HuckleB Mar 2015 #12

Based on this, and her unabashed promotion of a woo book... Archae Mar 2015 #14

It's bizarre. One has to wonder how this happens. HuckleB Mar 2015 #42

Link is nearly 2 years old, why post it now? Here's a newer article, seems to imply they pulled the uppityperson Mar 2015 #16

Are you saying that she has changed her stance? HuckleB Mar 2015 #19

I did post a recent link about her book. Or do you mean the anti-GMO stance? I think that's current uppityperson Mar 2015 #21

So, no, she hasn't change her stance. HuckleB Mar 2015 #22

I was just asking why you posted a 2 yr old story about her, and added in a newer one on her book. uppityperson Mar 2015 #23

Why does a post on her old position, which she is repeating, get so many likes at DU? HuckleB Mar 2015 #24

I have come around on the GMO issue over the last couple years. It appalled me, then I read more and uppityperson Mar 2015 #25

I don't know anyone who trusts any corporations. HuckleB Mar 2015 #27

And after taking a look at that other thread, I understand this one better. uppityperson Mar 2015 #28

I really wish she had not gone down this road. HuckleB Mar 2015 #29

Why is it OK for Monsanto to profit from GMOs, but not organic food stores for labeling? immoderate Mar 2015 #32

I'd like labeling laundry_queen Mar 2015 #35

I agree. The ecological and economic factors are also considerable. immoderate Mar 2015 #36

Why is it ok to try and put words into my mouth? hmmm uppityperson Mar 2015 #38

It would be wrong for me to do that. immoderate Mar 2015 #39

How Scare Tactics on GMO Foods Hurt Everybody HuckleB Mar 2015 #40