Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
"it seems, she's disinterested in following the law when it comes to governmental data collection." wyldwolf Mar 2015 #1
The Federal Records Act. merrily Mar 2015 #108
Show me where that applies here wyldwolf Mar 2015 #205
Law or not, she did the EXACT SAME THING SARAH PALIN DID! HRC acted deceptively. TheBlackAdder Mar 2015 #203
Will, you have a gift. Thank you for your words. Autumn Mar 2015 #2
maybe you can swear her out just like you did Obama on the ACA still_one Mar 2015 #3
I remember that. wyldwolf Mar 2015 #5
I missed that... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #11
Trying to find it for you. Until then, here's another top 10 hit: wyldwolf Mar 2015 #28
ah, here we go wyldwolf Mar 2015 #31
It seems like a misreading of the ACA while not perfect has been a godsend to many people. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #40
Night and Day wyldwolf Mar 2015 #42
+1 Hekate Mar 2015 #58
When you run out of facts, is personal attack your default setting, ww? leveymg Mar 2015 #60
Interesting you think it's an attack. Will thinks it's evolution wyldwolf Mar 2015 #76
yea, lets make it personal G_j Mar 2015 #72
Which was? Will is happy that a fellow Democrat was unjustly smeared? dbackjon Mar 2015 #212
Evolution. WilliamPitt Mar 2015 #74
Obviously you don't accept what she wrote in her book. That could be considered evolution still_one Mar 2015 #87
It's posts like this that make me wish that "Oh, Snap" were still an "in" saying. merrily Mar 2015 #116
Disagree, but while we're at it, there's a whole slew of DUers who changed their stances on a dime cui bono Mar 2015 #179
EXCELLENT! grasswire Mar 2015 #224
a-fucking-men awoke_in_2003 Mar 2015 #284
+1. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #82
Actually that was kind of a mea culpa. The original post was far worse still_one Mar 2015 #85
"maybe you can swear her out just like you did Obama" LondonReign2 Mar 2015 #79
As much as I disagree with you, Codeine Mar 2015 #95
Lol. I like your sense of humor still_one Mar 2015 #127
DUzy. nt awoke_in_2003 Mar 2015 #285
Swear her out of what? merrily Mar 2015 #112
I haven't heard that expression... one_voice Mar 2015 #171
And maybe you could comment on the OP rather than attempting to discredit the messenger, a tactic sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #201
Good plan! demwing Mar 2015 #268
Flawless LittleBlue Mar 2015 #4
Actually not. Like so much he puts out... Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #83
Seems that the facts bear out for Will. freebrew Mar 2015 #110
You know, there is a thread of truth in everything Limbaugh and O'Reilly say, too. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #128
So I'm Limbaugh and O'Reilly now. WilliamPitt Mar 2015 #135
Paranoid much? Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #136
Anyone can read what you implied. Bugenhagen Mar 2015 #144
+1 The meme that left of center is more rightist than the center right is ludicrous on its face. merrily Mar 2015 #147
Does it faze you at all that Pitt has now been shown to be incredibly premature in passing judgment? Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #208
Odd reply to my Reply 147, which had zero to do with Hillary's emails. merrily Mar 2015 #210
Loaded question Bugenhagen Mar 2015 #220
Speaking of ass... Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #178
Well, YOU care, apparently demwing Mar 2015 #269
No, but I really enjoy throwing salt in the wounds. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #278
So you're a troll? demwing Mar 2015 #288
Sweet jeebus. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #289
look in the fucking mirror demwing Mar 2015 #290
There's a "fucking mirror"? Sounds kinky. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #291
Oh my heart, it's breaking demwing Mar 2015 #293
...and Hitler, Putin luv'r. L0oniX Mar 2015 #231
And yet you didn't rebut it at all. n/t cui bono Mar 2015 #182
Oh, but I did Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #184
I was replying to your unsubstantive post that merely claimed bullshit. n/t cui bono Mar 2015 #197
Really, that was your response to Keystone? TiberiusB Mar 2015 #272
Opposition to Keystone is a symbolic gesture. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #279
I'm not sure we can handle that much cognitive dissonance tularetom Mar 2015 #6
She ain't "our" nominee yet. merrily Mar 2015 #120
K and R bigwillq Mar 2015 #7
Oh, for heaven's sake nichomachus Mar 2015 #8
Pedantic mode on! jeff47 Mar 2015 #17
That's what they want you to think. nichomachus Mar 2015 #19
Utah Data Center was completed in May 2014 at a cost of $1.5 billion .... Go Vols Mar 2015 #157
Thank you for your service nichomachus Mar 2015 #177
Now witness the firepower of this fully armed and operational datacenter! TiberiusB Mar 2015 #275
Were you that dismissive of violating the Federal Records Act when Bushco did it? merrily Mar 2015 #148
Not to mention the scarier part of the post that is sayingn go ahead and break the law cui bono Mar 2015 #193
I assumed the post was at least half tongue in cheek. merrily Mar 2015 #198
P.S. Please post whatever nonsense, true or not, you must post to protect the anointed one merrily Mar 2015 #204
Wow! Schumer doesn't believe in Democratic primaries??? cui bono Mar 2015 #209
More rhan that, he admits that avoiding primaries has been official DSCC POLICY since 2005. merrily Mar 2015 #211
Yup. We get to vote on who TPTB allow us to vote on. cui bono Mar 2015 #222
Wow. Really? Ask the NSA for the emails??? cui bono Mar 2015 #191
What law did she break? dbackjon Mar 2015 #213
... cui bono Mar 2015 #216
Be specific. And use real source dbackjon Mar 2015 #233
Follow the link provided. cui bono Mar 2015 #234
No they were not dbackjon Mar 2015 #236
I believe alot of Hillary supporters olddots Mar 2015 #9
Give her a break! I bet she was just "sleep deprived." n/t RufusTFirefly Mar 2015 #35
What mistake? Most of them are simply supporting the anointee of the Democratic Party. merrily Mar 2015 #149
Flowers blooming are always helped along by sowing turds. And white hat/black hat logic. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #10
So tell me... WilliamPitt Mar 2015 #14
Demanding comment board answers...no reply?..declaring victory! Save you the trouble..you win. White hat, always. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #18
Mutually exclusive thinking is stinking thinking. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #21
Exactly my point...nuance invites debate, choosing hats invites prattle and turd flinging. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #26
Never stand in front of someone with an ideological axe to grind./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #32
Does not concern me much, cyber-axes are blunt instruments. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #34
I would be a hypocrite, at least in my own mind, if I held ... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #36
How does that explain her betrayal via selling the Bush lies? rhett o rick Mar 2015 #47
And how many of them are willing to step into the fray and challenge her? Fla Dem Mar 2015 #75
There were quite a few last time. Why do you think no one will now? cui bono Mar 2015 #186
I don't know that there'll be no one. That's my point. Who's it going to be that will Fla Dem Mar 2015 #246
Why do I need to have the alternative handy? If I don't, does that mean it has to be HC? cui bono Mar 2015 #249
I agree, would love to see the conversation shift more to the left, but Fla Dem Mar 2015 #281
Does she have your vote? WilliamPitt Mar 2015 #27
Is there an election? Let me get out my calendar...nope, none on my calendar. What about yours? Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #33
Pretty slick with those tap shoes. WilliamPitt Mar 2015 #37
Thank you, I keep them in tune. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #38
if she runs and wins the primary, does she have yours? I am truly curious. uppityperson Mar 2015 #55
I honestly don't know. WilliamPitt Mar 2015 #70
There is not rtracey Mar 2015 #88
That is not really the correct definition but instead an Einstein quote. Insanity is uppityperson Mar 2015 #146
It's not an Einstein quote, either. Could be Rita Mae Brown. greyl Mar 2015 #262
huh. I was wrong and learned something here today. Thanks for the info. uppityperson Mar 2015 #263
It's funny, greyl Mar 2015 #298
You had no problem voting for John Kerry, the pro IWR and Patriot Act senator from Massachusetts DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #237
Gawd, I hate to break it to you, but the President is elected by the Electoral College. Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #253
You lost me... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #255
How Will voted in 2004 didn't matter, Massachusetts was a blue state that was going to vote for Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #256
What matters is he is criticizing someone for behavior he countenanced for another./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #257
Will is older and wiser now. What's the problem? Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #260
Eleven years in the life of a quinquagenarian makes one older and wiser? DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #270
Yes. 11 years can be a long time for some quinquagenarians. Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #294
I will never countenance hypocrisy.Like Christ I would rather suffer the cross./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #295
Your 04 candidate John Kerry voted for the IWR, the Patriot Act and Citi and Goldman Sachs... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #239
Yes, but this is different because.. Cha Mar 2015 #252
Lol, nice try, we have higher standard, well, maybe not some of us! nt Logical Mar 2015 #140
The only thing sadder would be a President Cruz, Jeb Bush etc dbackjon Mar 2015 #12
You're not supposed to trot out that turd of an argument until October 2016. n/t nichomachus Mar 2015 #16
..which will be the ONLY argument by then. radiclib Mar 2015 #45
That used to be a big concern for me LiberalLovinLug Mar 2015 #119
If you don't think there would be a difference in a Clinton appointee or a Republcan appointee dbackjon Mar 2015 #122
She hasn't even announced yet, let alone won both the nomination and the general. merrily Mar 2015 #126
Agreed - but that still doesn't stop a good portion of DU dbackjon Mar 2015 #139
Nor does it stop a different portion of DU from posting as though she already won the nomination. merrily Mar 2015 #141
She is the front runner if she declares dbackjon Mar 2015 #161
But you were discussing her SCOTUS nominations, not her her positions. merrily Mar 2015 #162
Its still a concern LiberalLovinLug Mar 2015 #241
Great argument for next year around this time, but very premature before the primary even begins. merrily Mar 2015 #123
I'm a Luddite myself.... Indepatriot Mar 2015 #13
Not only did she not know about the Texas Two Step, but she was "savvy" enough to announce that to merrily Mar 2015 #131
To my knowledge Shrum did not work for Clinton - her top person at first was Patti Solis Doyle karynnj Mar 2015 #165
Thanks, karenny, but I did link to a wiki article that covered Doyle, Williams, Penn, et al. merrily Mar 2015 #166
I brought up the other things to suggest that Shrum was trying to demonstrate in karynnj Mar 2015 #173
As I said in my prior post, Shrum was an OT aside to begin with. Sorry, but I am not going down merrily Mar 2015 #175
I stand corrected about Shrum heading her campaign. Indepatriot Mar 2015 #261
I think that she H2O Man Mar 2015 #15
"It's OK, because a Republican did it. But it's not OK if Republicans do it. But it's OK, because Dreamer Tatum Mar 2015 #23
I don't think the Luddite explanation holds water, because it was a new domain Yo_Mama Mar 2015 #20
Luddites can employ technologically savvy people. (nt) jeff47 Mar 2015 #25
If she's a Luddite* she sure keeps that phone handy in her world wide travels. Autumn Mar 2015 #41
A blackberry does not make one technologically savvy. jeff47 Mar 2015 #43
I think that the claim is that she isn't tech savvy is just silly IMO. Autumn Mar 2015 #50
People have different measures of "savvy". jeff47 Mar 2015 #53
I don't get why using one kind of email account is easier than using another. merrily Mar 2015 #132
Well, it wasn't even what she was used to using, so???? Yo_Mama Mar 2015 #159
I ain't buying the Luddite thing, that's for sure. merrily Mar 2015 #160
I don't believe clinton is uncomfortable with email. she's an intelligent woman and not that ND-Dem Mar 2015 #219
Note that account was hacked yet she continued to use it. leveymg Mar 2015 #265
Who says she's sad? randome Mar 2015 #22
And people say I'm overly literal. merrily Mar 2015 #134
"a nice warm purple space where we're trying to solve problems." The Onion? No. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #24
"..Clinton must be tempted to forego any genuflecting to progressives." KoKo Mar 2015 #64
A Wall Street Journal article about all the financial advisors her campaign has hired so far to merrily Mar 2015 #138
the K and the R... mike_c Mar 2015 #29
Well, okay then. I'm sure you'll like the results a whole lot when you decide to stay home on calimary Mar 2015 #30
And now she's pals with Henry Kissinger, the same creep who Cleita Mar 2015 #39
I am sorry for what happened in Chile, Cleita. johnnyreb Mar 2015 #137
Not only now. merrily Mar 2015 #145
One could write a similar post about President Obama guillaumeb Mar 2015 #44
Yes, I get it. Maedhros Mar 2015 #61
you do not get my point guillaumeb Mar 2015 #67
LOL the only people I notice being divisive are the ones saying we should not be divisive. Rex Mar 2015 #46
I guess Scott Walker would make a better choice. denbot Mar 2015 #48
OMG REPUBLICANS YOU GUYS WilliamPitt Mar 2015 #49
I'd prefer Saunders, Biden, and if Warren were running she would top my list. denbot Mar 2015 #57
Either you're incredibly ignorant of the facts or were too lazy to check them... brooklynite Mar 2015 #63
Social issues? sendero Mar 2015 #242
Funny, I was told that she ALWAYS voted with the Republicans... brooklynite Mar 2015 #243
Hillary=Democrat daredtowork Mar 2015 #99
2000 and 2004 were both stolen elections so maybe you should try a better canard. Rex Mar 2015 #51
Your damn right they were stolen, and now they are history. denbot Mar 2015 #69
No one is rejecting a Democratic candidate in the general. You keep glossing over the fact cui bono Mar 2015 #195
and what happened in 2004 when Conyers investigated the election? Mnpaul Mar 2015 #229
Typical hillary supporter, we need hillary to beat the GOP, lol! nt Logical Mar 2015 #143
Hmm... so we're not having a Democratic Primary any more? cui bono Mar 2015 #194
In fairness, she has not yet run on a platform of change. Orsino Mar 2015 #52
I'd be impressed with this 'scandal' if it had anything at all to do with any of those complaints bigtree Mar 2015 #54
I believe the Bushies did far far worse than anything they are accusing Hillary of. Enthusiast Mar 2015 #55
You really think Obama single-handedly is responsible for all post-Bush-era consequences? randome Mar 2015 #66
The only Argument for Hillary Rilgin Mar 2015 #59
is inevitability. n/t leveymg Mar 2015 #62
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #65
Then of course, there is the real story... stevenleser Mar 2015 #68
That explains the IWR vote, the PATRIOT Act, Keystone and Goldman Sachs? WilliamPitt Mar 2015 #73
Yep, it does. stevenleser Mar 2015 #78
that is one lame list Bugenhagen Mar 2015 #154
Calling Civil Rights, Voting Rights and reproductive rights 'wedge issues' is very 2003 Bluenorthwest Mar 2015 #167
Oh my God, I am running to high five your post! Number23 Mar 2015 #199
I doubt we could be any more in agreement on any issues than on those you list Bugenhagen Mar 2015 #218
To a white heterosexual everything civil rights related is a wedge issue./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #238
If I could rec your post I would. emulatorloo Mar 2015 #258
Lol, gullible much? No wonder fox keeps inviting you back! nt Logical Mar 2015 #105
Now that's a WPitt post I can rec. Dawgs Mar 2015 #71
Not a Hillary fan, but I'll rec this thread when hell freezes over. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #84
Why? n/t Dawgs Mar 2015 #89
Couple of reasons. One rational, one personal. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #92
well rtracey Mar 2015 #77
Welcome to the Democratic version of the Tea Party Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #80
and those who think it is okay to poison our food supply and hopemountain Mar 2015 #163
More hysteria. Christ, Pitt. I hope you are reading this with glee. More attention for you. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #180
why are you attacking me? hopemountain Mar 2015 #287
Not allowing criticism is the same thing, worse actually, because it takes our party farther right. cui bono Mar 2015 #190
I guess it boils down to whether or not you agree with him. I don't. n/t Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #200
You'll vote for her in the end alcibiades_mystery Mar 2015 #81
Already giving her the nom, huh? Dawgs Mar 2015 #91
Ha! alcibiades_mystery Mar 2015 #96
I do believe your post just cost her some votes Android3.14 Mar 2015 #217
ROFL alcibiades_mystery Mar 2015 #225
I dunno, kid Android3.14 Mar 2015 #226
Give Democrats somebody else to vote for and they will. AtomicKitten Mar 2015 #106
Sure you will alcibiades_mystery Mar 2015 #117
No, I won't. AtomicKitten Mar 2015 #118
You are correct on all points, as usual, WilliamPitt. joanbarnes Mar 2015 #86
You don't understand Will, she had to get a new account Capt. Obvious Mar 2015 #90
More Negative Hateful Spin on Democrats Cryptoad Mar 2015 #93
when they do stuff you, I or we disagree, we should just neverforget Mar 2015 #189
Bah, humbug and all that other stuff! juajen Mar 2015 #94
Yep. Very sad. Tsk. Tsk. Millionaire politician suffers embarrassment. Tragic. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2015 #97
I couldn't agree more. Mr. Mustard Mar 2015 #98
In light of this, I'm going to have to reconsider you, William, as someone to ignore, lol! closeupready Mar 2015 #100
Like little flowers' terrific feelings for it, Young Guy. Octafish Mar 2015 #101
Won't somebody please call her a KamaAina Mar 2015 #102
Thank you. Sheelanagig Mar 2015 #103
"I'm not being divisive." "This is the cold, hard truth." asjr Mar 2015 #104
If you Honestly think that a post on DU would cause someone who believes Mrs. Clinton Indepatriot Mar 2015 #124
You may keep your bridge. That is a very juvenile response. I did not mention Mrs. Clinton in my asjr Mar 2015 #133
Bravo, Will. Bravissimo! hifiguy Mar 2015 #107
Spot on. Thank you. AtomicKitten Mar 2015 #109
Why this story is even worse than it appears dissentient Mar 2015 #111
good article, thanks. MBS Mar 2015 #232
Kick and Rec Myrina Mar 2015 #113
Here we go again. George II Mar 2015 #114
lol rosesaylavee Mar 2015 #115
the Mark Rich pardon alone should disqualify her from consideration Adenoid_Hynkel Mar 2015 #121
K&R! Carolina Mar 2015 #125
"If the Bush administration had unspooled that line, this place would have erupted. And rightly so." hootinholler Mar 2015 #129
Hillary aside, one line inyour post alone ought to earn it some sort of immortality: Jackpine Radical Mar 2015 #130
I am with you on this one... NT Left coast liberal Mar 2015 #142
My vote counts and I am voting! maggies farm Mar 2015 #150
Way to go, there, Will. Pile on. MineralMan Mar 2015 #151
Tell me about how you supported the war. WilliamPitt Mar 2015 #155
I'm not telling you anything, Will. MineralMan Mar 2015 #169
Shoving words in people's mouths? I thought you were better than that. emulatorloo Mar 2015 #259
Bread. Bobbie Jo Mar 2015 #158
Honesty deserves a few flowers.... daleanime Mar 2015 #152
Daily Beast proved the story is not true. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #153
Ooops. Looks like someone got punked by the NYT. McCamy Taylor Mar 2015 #156
Yes - William Pitt and the rest of the Hillary Haters dbackjon Mar 2015 #214
Will is rarely right Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2015 #282
are you calling the poster a liar? Duppers Mar 2015 #164
No WilliamPitt Mar 2015 #170
Thanks! Duppers Mar 2015 #192
+1 -- on all aspects of your post. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #181
. stonecutter357 Mar 2015 #168
The Republican candidate would... Mike Nelson Mar 2015 #172
Will Pitt - you are ALWAYS divisive MaggieD Mar 2015 #174
Hillary Clinton is not "my people" WilliamPitt Mar 2015 #185
Let's be clear then MaggieD Mar 2015 #221
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Mar 2015 #240
No - it reads mostly of repub talking points MaggieD Mar 2015 #247
But, would you buy a used car from her? Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #248
I wouldn't buy a used car from ANY politician MaggieD Mar 2015 #273
+1 Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #207
It WASN'T the law when she was Sec State MaggieD Mar 2015 #176
K&R for pissing off all the right people! Rex Mar 2015 #183
k&R Thespian2 Mar 2015 #187
And while you are wrestling the party back from the abyss, what happens to the Women randys1 Mar 2015 #188
Coming to bat... NotHardly Mar 2015 #196
Always ready to believe the worst. stonecutter357 Mar 2015 #202
Sad, What? She's having a GREAT evening however. Anxious to hear her speak at the Emilys List Honor misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #206
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Mar 2015 #215
So yo Clinton had a bad day? William Pitt has forced me to think about who Jeb Bush will name to Sarcastica Mar 2015 #223
oy vey. Not that shit again. 840high Mar 2015 #227
^^^this^^^ L0oniX Mar 2015 #230
How dare you defy the will of the pragmatic centrists! L0oniX Mar 2015 #228
This message was self-deleted by its author Autumn Mar 2015 #235
Except that the law did not apply until after she left office eridani Mar 2015 #244
You're correct. She did the same as Colin Powell. wolfie001 Mar 2015 #283
Jesus, Pitt. You're ahead of the news cycle again. Beausoir Mar 2015 #245
TRUTH. blkmusclmachine Mar 2015 #250
She's not a control freak, Will - she's merely a control enthusiast! bullwinkle428 Mar 2015 #251
Shorter OP "Benghazi!" geek tragedy Mar 2015 #254
The resultant ass covering scramble from the custodial team whereisjustice Mar 2015 #264
197 people give her good friends a sadz. You think they take applications at the State department? Rex Mar 2015 #266
You ARE being divisive. MADem Mar 2015 #267
I agree DesertDiamond Mar 2015 #271
"Because there's not a dime's worth of difference between Al Gore and George Bush" greenman3610 Mar 2015 #274
Sure makes one wonder why the NYT went with a story knowing it wasn't Historic NY Mar 2015 #276
Spot on! Bravo WilliamPitt! n/t Buenaventura Mar 2015 #277
"I'm very sorry Hillary Clinton has a sad today" amuse bouche Mar 2015 #280
K&R. In 2016 a lot of DUers will have to go to polls mylye2222 Mar 2015 #286
K & R Owl Mar 2015 #292
kick woo me with science Mar 2015 #296
kick woo me with science Mar 2015 #297
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm very sorry Hillary Cl...»Reply #171