Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I will not vote to support the revocation of the ACA. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #1
Really? And Hillary is the only Democrat out of 300,000,000 people who supports ACA? whereisjustice Mar 2015 #2
Who said anything about Hillary Clinton? Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #3
Yes, every year conservatives advocate the "reality" that we must support only the most conservative whereisjustice Mar 2015 #4
I am a liberal because I will not vote Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #5
so we should just sit back and let the system tell us who to vote for regardless of principals - we whereisjustice Mar 2015 #7
Never told you to vote for Hillary. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #9
Third way's conservative posturing will cost the election. Why do you want Republicans to win? whereisjustice Mar 2015 #10
Bullshit. If you fail to actively support liberal policies, programs, and laws. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #13
Explain how liberal policies are helped by grooming a single conservative candidate? whereisjustice Mar 2015 #17
We are electing 30 Senators, 435 members of the House, a President and Vice President. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #22
And the Third Way is influencing them all, so once again I ask, why do Democrats want Republicans to whereisjustice Mar 2015 #23
The Democratic Party is not shutting out liberals. We are here. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #30
And there's the claim anti-Hillary=non-Democrat, non-Liberal =.= daredtowork Mar 2015 #46
When people refuse to support liberal policy, programs, and individual rights Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #54
I stand on my comment. nt daredtowork Mar 2015 #61
And I stand by mine. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #64
I swear Aerows Mar 2015 #130
How does not voting for one candidate prevent me from voting for the others on my ballot? TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #94
If you nominate H. Clinton then you don't care if the Republicons win. We have better rhett o rick Mar 2015 #33
Only the anti-hillary/anti-thirdway group are talking about nominating Hillary. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #36
The Third Way does not support liberal policies. They support Conservative values. nm rhett o rick Mar 2015 #39
The anti-thirdway/anti-hillary crowd do not support liberal policies. They are not liberals. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #41
You're funny Scootaloo Mar 2015 #59
Sometimes funny is good. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #65
Good-funny is good. bad-funny is sad. Scootaloo Mar 2015 #78
This is Aerows Mar 2015 #133
What I find curious is that the Conservative Wing of our party really want to be called liberals. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #105
Raises Hand! Aerows Mar 2015 #131
Like whom? ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #127
We need candidates, not only for the White House, but for Congress and local JDPriestly Mar 2015 #80
1+1=2 but 1+0=1 not 2, the only way a vote helps the TeaPubliKlans is if it is added to their total. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #92
Why are generalizing Third Way going against unions? I happen to be a life long union member and Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #6
I don't know many union members who support third way's TPP program. Do you? Can you whereisjustice Mar 2015 #8
You pick out a subject if which has not even been revealed. If the unions has Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #11
Which unions support TPP (or even Third Way for that matter) - I asked a simple question whereisjustice Mar 2015 #12
I dont know nor do I care, dont judge me on being a union member and liking Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #14
How many jobs do you believe should be sent to Asia? How much lower should our wages be? whereisjustice Mar 2015 #15
Twll me exactly what is contained in the TPP, not rumors or judging by any agreements in the past, Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #18
That is a bs demand, given that the agreement is in a secure room. However, the word of people merrily Mar 2015 #26
I know it is in a secure room, details are not known, poster wanted a decisive answer and I Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #89
You support prior agreements? Which ones and why do you think they helped American workers? TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #95
It's over, no more questions answered on this thread. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #96
No answers will do that to you every time. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #115
When politicians demand secrecy, it's not so they can throw you a birthday party. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #110
You tell us what could be in the TPP that the unions might like. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #34
What is in TPP unions dislike, again we do not know what is in TPP and I am not going to answer Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #90
You certainly have a lot of posts here for not wanting to comment about information that isn't rhett o rick Mar 2015 #97
see post #96 Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #98
See post 97. nm rhett o rick Mar 2015 #100
you're talking to the person who was on a kick about the rampant fraud in SSDI for a while. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #29
thanks, that figures, lol whereisjustice Mar 2015 #32
... SidDithers Mar 2015 #48
... ND-Dem Mar 2015 #50
Yeah. I don't like homophobes... SidDithers Mar 2015 #52
... ND-Dem Mar 2015 #53
Question: What's your basis for the assertion, Sid? Scootaloo Mar 2015 #81
The homophobic tropes have a unique flavor profile...here's one I just read in yet another thread Bluenorthwest Mar 2015 #109
But how does that prove that the guy's a zombie? Scootaloo Mar 2015 #136
Yup, admitted in this thread to be a Third Wayer LondonReign2 Mar 2015 #129
In the real world it's not possible to support or oppose something that hasn't been written yet. RB TexLa Mar 2015 #16
I agree, until I see the exact wording it is impossible to make a decision. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #19
LMAO. merrily Mar 2015 #28
In the real world something like TPP is designed by conservatives and fast tracked to prevent whereisjustice Mar 2015 #20
Sanders, Warren, Grayson and unions are not living in the real world? DUers know better? merrily Mar 2015 #27
In the real world we've seen parts of it. It may not be final, but we can certainly see the rhett o rick Mar 2015 #35
I support free trade, President Obama doing something doesn't have anything to do with it. RB TexLa Mar 2015 #40
No one has even tried to explain how this TPP, which is way more than a "trade agreement" rhett o rick Mar 2015 #42
Sounds like like you got it all figured out, now get out there with your talking points RB TexLa Mar 2015 #43
Nah, he's too busy crossing his fingers and clapping for zappaman Mar 2015 #62
You support legislation so what is so funny or tricky about wanting to know the benefits of the act? TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #99
But you have nothing. Not even talking points. Here's one you can use: "What's good for corporations rhett o rick Mar 2015 #104
Speak up. Aerows Mar 2015 #132
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #66
If you think Democrats are anti-capitalist BainsBane Mar 2015 #21
Clinton is a conservative Third Way Lobbyist. By unconditionally refusing to challenge her whereisjustice Mar 2015 #24
+10000! Katashi_itto Mar 2015 #25
"Refusing to challenge her" BainsBane Mar 2015 #44
And it just takes one president to push through NAFTA or TPP or another war and it all whereisjustice Mar 2015 #47
i never see people like those who claim to be the most liberal on the internet at local events JI7 Mar 2015 #55
How do you know if you are seeing anonymous posters at local events or not? merrily Mar 2015 #57
based on the things they say JI7 Mar 2015 #58
LOL! merrily Mar 2015 #60
most of them support Hillary for President and i never heard the criticisms of her that i read on JI7 Mar 2015 #67
Covered by my prior post. merrily Mar 2015 #68
people can claim to be anything on the internet so my point is more about those who claim JI7 Mar 2015 #73
Not really. Your point is nothing but insinuation and imagination. merrily Mar 2015 #74
there are scientific polls which people like romney did not understand JI7 Mar 2015 #75
maybe they should - eom dreamnightwind Mar 2015 #69
I never see them whipping the next "free trade" agreement, the next war, or the next austerity scam TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #103
Is that so? BainsBane Mar 2015 #86
It is amazing they have the ability to get involved treestar Mar 2015 #72
That statement is absurd to most of the people in this country treestar Mar 2015 #71
REAGAN would be a commie to the right. He raised taxes, you know. Four times! Scootaloo Mar 2015 #79
Yeah, Reagan raised taxes... Art_from_Ark Mar 2015 #91
Reagan was a blacklisting, red baiting bigot. His director of communications was Pat Buchanan. Bluenorthwest Mar 2015 #111
Ive never heard a right winger complain about that in regards to Reagan treestar Mar 2015 #114
+1 Scuba Mar 2015 #88
No one here has ever said there are no differences between the parties. That is a rhett o rick Mar 2015 #38
"The Conservative Wing likes NAFTA, CAFTA, the WTO ..." But far-right repubs hate them? FDR lowered pampango Mar 2015 #87
So you are saying that you support the so called "Free Trade" agreements like the TPP? rhett o rick Mar 2015 #101
I am saying that there is such a thing as a GOOD trade agreement. FDR negotiated plenty of them. pampango Mar 2015 #107
I understand what you say. The problem I am having is that some people that I respect rhett o rick Mar 2015 #113
If "because Obama" was the coin you pretend you'd be shoving Obama's existing efforts down our TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #116
If the policies of FDR are irrelevant to you because 'times are different now' that is your choice. pampango Mar 2015 #120
I believe that certainly the impacts of trade are vastly different. We are talking a time when we TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #121
Excellent summation Populist_Prole Mar 2015 #122
Today progressive countries benefit from FDR's policies on trade, taxes, regulation and safety nets. pampango Mar 2015 #123
I welcome seeing the standards for labor and protection of the environment increased for Americans. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #125
You didn't knock that one out of the park Aerows Mar 2015 #134
Thanks TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #135
Well said. treestar Mar 2015 #70
Excuse me, the "idle left"? Scootaloo Mar 2015 #76
Well said. nt Bobbie Jo Mar 2015 #93
What do unions say about TPP and Fast track? Democrats should fight for jobs and living wages in USA whereisjustice Mar 2015 #31
TY 840high Mar 2015 #37
SEIU too Scootaloo Mar 2015 #82
They live in a patronage bubble daredtowork Mar 2015 #45
EST - I met one of "trainers" of that shit by way of mutal friend. must have been early 80s? whereisjustice Mar 2015 #49
Please double appreciate it XD daredtowork Mar 2015 #56
Last I knew, it had morphed into something called The Forum, but even that was a while ago. merrily Mar 2015 #63
btw - I'd encourage you to edit and repost this as OP whereisjustice Mar 2015 #51
I may do this tomorrow evening daredtowork Mar 2015 #84
please send me a note when you do so I can K & R it :) whereisjustice Mar 2015 #119
This would be a good basis for its own OP n/t Scootaloo Mar 2015 #83
Thanks - maybe tomorrow evening! :) nt daredtowork Mar 2015 #85
+ 1000 nt raouldukelives Mar 2015 #112
Excellent Caretha Mar 2015 #118
The DLC, predecessor of the Third Way, Warpy Mar 2015 #77
Where is your alternative candidate? JoePhilly Mar 2015 #102
Whoa boy fredamae Mar 2015 #106
No, it's all Turd Way. Little sense in getting caught up in the various brands under the umbrella TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #117
K & R GoneFishin Mar 2015 #108
The sole difference between the economic polices of HRC and any Repuke hifiguy Mar 2015 #124
Unfortunately, the bystanders in our myriad foreign wars will continue to be boiled Maedhros Mar 2015 #128
Your concern is noted. Thank you. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #126
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Third Way Democrats co...»Reply #19