Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In their own words. An "intellectual buyout" of the Democratic Party. [View all]madfloridian
(88,117 posts)114. Still condescending. Groundhog day?
These are posts that need repeating. Nothing is changing, the think tanks just try to be unobtrusive about their warnings to liberals.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
126 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In their own words. An "intellectual buyout" of the Democratic Party. [View all]
madfloridian
Feb 2015
OP
I guess I live in cuckoo land because I believe in people first and Big Business second..
Bandit
Feb 2015
#20
"They are still lecturing the left, the liberals to stop complaining." Right here, every day.
Scuba
Feb 2015
#4
Simply check out how little coverage the low voter turnout from the last cycle.....
daleanime
Feb 2015
#116
Obama covered it Nov 2014: "Those who voted, I heard you. Those who didn't vote, I heard you, too."
merrily
Feb 2015
#117
I don't think they want ordinary voters support, actually. The rudeness and lack of regard for
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#68
Thanks, madfloridian. According to Conyers, both OASDI and Medicare were put on the table.
merrily
Feb 2015
#10
It needs a lot of time to take hold and a buttload of money up front and no one will provide that.
merrily
Feb 2015
#40
That thinking, 'unprofitable mindsets (SS, Public School Ed, etc) replaced by 'more efficient
sabrina 1
Feb 2015
#19
The issue was regional... it made it hard for democrats to win in SOME places
HereSince1628
Feb 2015
#23
Great thread. thanks. Archivists awe me some, esp. if they are not archiving for
merrily
Feb 2015
#43
Do not let down. These are historical facts about the Clintion Faction of the democractic party
Exultant Democracy
Feb 2015
#26
so cutting and pasting the same post over and over is going to make a difference?
wyldwolf
Feb 2015
#60
So the question is, do you stand up for principles, or do you sell out to be a "winner"?
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#71
Interesting that you admit you don't consider yourself progressive. Will you go the next
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#86
When have I ever NOT admitted I wasn't a 'progressive?' That isn't interesting at all.
wyldwolf
Feb 2015
#87
Maybe you will accept definitions from dictionary.com. A Progressive (noun) is "a person who is
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#103
Really? You could apply that to anyone you disagree with. Where did you get that
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#109
Howard Dean did a good job with the 50 State Strategy, but the dem leadership dropped it.
CrispyQ
Feb 2015
#101
Let's legislate exclusively for the benefit of rich people. What could go wrong? eom
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#63
DLC and Third Way Democrats are all in it for THEMSELVES. They do NOT CARE
closeupready
Feb 2015
#90
Capitalism and party mixed. What ever brings in more money for the campaign ...wins.
L0oniX
Feb 2015
#93
And the results of 'freeing themselves from positions that make it difficult to win'.
pa28
Feb 2015
#95
But, but Bill Clinton won a three way race 20+ years ago what else do you need to know?
TheKentuckian
Feb 2015
#98
We lost the House. We lost the Senate. We lost a majority of state legislatures...
DemocratSinceBirth
Feb 2015
#111