Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]

patrice

(47,992 posts)
12. Balancing a budget that historically been so HEAVILY weighted toward "defense" spending is a non-
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 05:04 PM
Apr 2012

starter for a lot of us, especially since what we are talking about is "balancing" figures that represent NOTHING, which as a Ron Paul supporter you should appreciate quite clearly. Nothing but ARBITRARY nothing, PRIVATE 0s and 1s processed in PRIVATELY designed "accounting" processes, inside of secret networks of PRIVATELY owned domestic AND FOREIGN computers.

Please be clear about my emphasis upon the PRIVATE nature of money defining and controlling the PUBLIC commonweal.

NO thank you!!! Balance that fucker on someone else's back, say . . . that of those who CREATED the problem in the first place, REAGANITE FUNDAMENTALISTS and their PRIVATELY engineered Social Darwinism.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #12