Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: David Axelrod: ELIZABETH WARREN Trying To ‘LEVERAGE’ Clinton [View all]polichick
(37,152 posts)25. Exactly. She might pretend to be a populist, but we'd be fools to believe it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
From what I've seen, Politico probably needs fact-check even more than spell check.
leveymg
Feb 2015
#36
Yeah I never thought Warren really wanted to run but just to put the fear of God in Hillary.
hrmjustin
Dec 2014
#2
I don't care how Hillary "frames her candidacy". I've no doubt she'll screw us all ...
Scuba
Dec 2014
#3
Exactly. She might pretend to be a populist, but we'd be fools to believe it.
polichick
Dec 2014
#25
IMO, candidate will govern however they want to. Warren is too smart to think Hillary would budge.
NYC_SKP
Dec 2014
#4
She does that, she'd be doing it even if it wasn't election season... IMO, Hillary is not 45.
NYC_SKP
Dec 2014
#11
imho, if we have a highly contested primary, we're looking at a republican win in 2016 anyway.
unblock
Dec 2014
#16
that's a different key. yes, republicans win that one simply because obama isn't running again.
unblock
Dec 2014
#33
and - yes, it is meant to be demeaning and marginalizing, like Warren is just a Hillary campaign
djean111
Dec 2014
#26
Because current affairs always change...taking positions creates the need to change position
HereSince1628
Feb 2015
#37