“You hear ‘Ready For Hillary’— It’s like, ready for what? (Reply #17)

In the discussion thread: David Axelrod: ELIZABETH WARREN Trying To ‘LEVERAGE’ Clinton [View all]

Response to Scuba (Reply #10)

Tue Dec 16, 2014, 12:31 PM

Segami (14,923 posts)

17. “You hear ‘Ready For Hillary’— It’s like, ready for what?

David hit it on the nose!

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

37 replies	Author	Time	Post
David Axelrod: ELIZABETH WARREN Trying To ‘LEVERAGE’ Clinton [View all]	Segami	Dec 2014	OP
She "through" caution to the wind???	joeybee12	Dec 2014	#1
no doubt that's exactly what they have. "through" is a correctly spelled word.	unblock	Dec 2014	#5
Or an editor....	joeybee12	Dec 2014	#18
+1 ;) n/t	fredamae	Dec 2014	#20
"Through" is the new "threw". I guess.	pa28	Dec 2014	#27
From what I've seen, Politico probably needs fact-check even more than spell check.	leveymg	Feb 2015	#36
Yeah I never thought Warren really wanted to run but just to put the fear of God in Hillary.	hrmjustin	Dec 2014	#2
But its too late for Hillary to go left, except on social issues.	RiverLover	Dec 2014	#6
It is never too late to go left.	hrmjustin	Dec 2014	#7
That could be one of her campaign slogans.	RiverLover	Dec 2014	#12
LOL!	KittyWampus	Dec 2014	#14
it seems you are confusing ...	1StrongBlackMan	Dec 2014	#29
I don't care how Hillary "frames her candidacy". I've no doubt she'll screw us all ...	Scuba	Dec 2014	#3
Hillary is spending her days...	Segami	Dec 2014	#9
More like "What should I pretend to be?"	Scuba	Dec 2014	#10
“You hear ‘Ready For Hillary’— It’s like, ready for what?	Segami	Dec 2014	#17
Exactly. She might pretend to be a populist, but we'd be fools to believe it.	polichick	Dec 2014	#25
I have a reply but it'll have to come by PM.	NYC_SKP	Dec 2014	#19
LOL.	Segami	Dec 2014	#23
IMO, candidate will govern however they want to. Warren is too smart to think Hillary would budge.	NYC_SKP	Dec 2014	#4
budge? maybe not. appoint to cabinet or even fed? that's another story.	unblock	Dec 2014	#8
She does that, she'd be doing it even if it wasn't election season... IMO, Hillary is not 45.	NYC_SKP	Dec 2014	#11
imho, if we have a highly contested primary, we're looking at a republican win in 2016 anyway.	unblock	Dec 2014	#16
"contested incumbent party primary"	truebluegreen	Dec 2014	#24
the democratic party is the incumbent party.	unblock	Dec 2014	#28
From the link you provided:	truebluegreen	Dec 2014	#31
that's a different key. yes, republicans win that one simply because obama isn't running again.	unblock	Dec 2014	#33
I'm confident Hillary would win	demwing	Dec 2014	#22
This entire piece is Axelrod's OPINION. Which sounds pretty spot on.	KittyWampus	Dec 2014	#13
I agree with his opinion	Renew Deal	Dec 2014	#30
I can dig it!!	BrettsJets	Dec 2014	#15
I think Elizabeth Warren would be doing exactly the same thing	MoonRiver	Dec 2014	#21
and - yes, it is meant to be demeaning and marginalizing, like Warren is just a Hillary campaign	djean111	Dec 2014	#26
I don't give a DAMN about how HRC "frames...	99Forever	Dec 2014	#32
I think Axelrod is mostly correct on this.	kentuck	Dec 2014	#34
I put Axelrod in the search line	fadedrose	Feb 2015	#35
Because current affairs always change...taking positions creates the need to change position	HereSince1628	Feb 2015	#37

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.